Joke Collection Website - Cold jokes - There is nothing wrong with what I said, but I touched on the interests of "rural women's rights"?

There is nothing wrong with what I said, but I touched on the interests of "rural women's rights"?

0 1

I once saw Mr. Wang's words on the internet, which caused an uproar. Many women rose up to "resist" Yu Xiansheng's words. Later, Mr. Yu specially sent Weibo to explain his point of view again, but it was useless.

However, in my opinion, Yu's words are not wrong at all, just touching the interests of some "rural girlfriends".

Here's a sentence, which I think is right, which exposes many secrets of "rural women's rights":

If women pursue knowledge life, men will certainly become smarter; If women only have money in their eyes, then men will try their best to make money and ignore spiritual cultivation!

What is "pastoral feminism"?

On the Zhihu, someone specifically answered:

That is, some women like to combine the rights and obligations in the two sets of values in China and the West, and only ask for the rights in the two sets of values without undertaking any of them.

To put it bluntly, this kind of woman is what Mr. Yu said: there is only money in his eyes, and he blindly asks men to make money to buy a house and get married, otherwise he will not marry; On the other hand, her own family is also a "poor family" who can't afford a house.

02

What is the biggest feature of pastoral feminism?

Is your money my money, my money or my money!

There was a program before, and the host interviewed some women randomly in the street: If a man had a house before marriage, would you ask him to add your name?

More than 70% of women said: Of course, I hope he will add his name, because it is not easy to leave his hometown and come to the man's house, and it is necessary to have children, so adding a name to the house makes them feel safe to live together!

And when the host then asked: If you had a house before marriage, would you add a man's name?

Who knows, 1000% of women said they didn't want to add a man's name, because it was their property before marriage, and the money was either given by her family or earned by herself, so there was no need to share it with men. Besides, it is easier for men to make money than women.

The same woman's inconsistent answer reflects those "rural women's rights" thoughts, blindly trying to extract more benefits from the man to satisfy his inner world.

To put it simply: as long as it is good for me, I have 100 reasons to convince men! If it is not good for me, I can have 10000 reasons to refuse your behavior.

Isn't this the woman who only has money in her eyes?

03

Before, a friend was separated by her mother-in-law because a man really couldn't afford a house in the city: my daughter can't marry a man without a house!

Finally, my girlfriend finally gave up and broke up with him under the fierce "bombing" of her family.

I don't know when, when we choose a son-in-law, it's not the first time to consider his character, but to directly use the house to measure whether he is qualified to fall in love with his daughter.

Isn't this the woman who only has money in her eyes?

Unfortunately, it is considered by many people as a natural condition for men to get married!