Village Secretary Reporting Letter

The so-called whistleblowing letter refers to a reporting method in which the whistleblower writes down the clues of the case to be reported in writing and sends or mails them to the reporting department. The following is a report letter from the village secretary that I carefully compiled. You are welcome to read it. I hope you will like it. Village Secretary Reporting Letter Part 1

Dear Mayor Sheng:

Hello! My name is xx, and I am a resident of xx community in xx office.

We hereby report to you the serious illegal and criminal behavior of our community secretary Li xx who took advantage of his position to wantonly embezzle collective money.

1. Cleverly created a pretext to embezzle a huge amount of collective demolition compensation

When the municipal government built the green belt of Jin'e Middle Road, it expropriated the office building and land in our community, but the compensation has not been paid. Not in place.

As a legacy issue, in 20xx, the building district government made a request for compensation to the municipal government. After the municipal government formed the meeting minutes, it compensated the Lijiachong community with a demolition compensation of 700,000 yuan.

At the end of 20xx, after the compensation amount of 500,000 yuan was received, Li xx, the then director of Lijiachong Community, designated the money as an "income-generating" economy for the community, and said that the "income-generating" economy could get a 30 rebate. As a result, he secretly took away 230,000 yuan from the community's finances. In addition to the 80,000 yuan he took away under the pretext that the funds needed to be coordinated, a total of 310,000 yuan was taken away by him.

Later, some people in the community believed that this money was the land acquisition and demolition money that the city government should compensate the community. The facts are clear, and the request report from the building district government and the meeting minutes of the city government clearly stated that it was not "income generation" for the community. "Economy, there is no precedent for private individuals not being able to get kickbacks! In particular, Li xx himself is a community worker. It is his responsibility and obligation to work for the community. Providing paid services within the scope of work and taking kickbacks is a disguised form of corruption! What's more, this amount is the result of coordinated handling by the urban government office and community based on facts and laws and regulations, and it is not the credit of Li xx or any one person! Report this to superiors.

Afterwards, under investigation by the Sanyanqiao Discipline Inspection Commission, Li xx returned 230,000 yuan.

But in order to justify and excuse himself, Li xx asked someone named Yu Guohong to refund the money.

In this way, Li xx explained that he actually did not get the 230,000 yuan, but paid the money to Yu Guohong. The reason was that the person in charge of the municipal government who was specifically responsible for handling this matter was named Chen Hanwen. , and Chen Hanwen and Yu Guohong are fellow villagers in Xiangyin County. Yu Guohong asked Chen Hanwen for the 500,000 yuan, so the 230,000 yuan kickback was a benefit to Yu Guohong.

The 230,000 yuan returned was not refunded by Yu Guohong at all, and he never took the money.

In fact, in order to help himself pass the Discipline Inspection Commission investigation, Li xx used his position to borrow money from Liao Lixin and Li Shengliang, the original funders of the Nanhuan Road Market Renovation Project, in the name of Lijiachong Community Collective. of.

After doing a lot of work, Li xx asked Yu Guohong to help him tide over the difficulties, and then Yu Guohong's son returned the money to the community.

But it turned out that the 230,000 and 80,000 yuan taken away by Li xx had long been embezzled by him.

Less than a week after the 230,000 yuan was returned, Li xx cleverly took away the money again in the name of compensation from the Nanhuan Road Market, using a fake agreement and a fake account, and he also forged a Lijiachong Community The branch agreed to pay the 230,000 yuan rebate fee, fake meeting minutes and agreement, and advanced the time for the minutes, and then forced each branch member to sign the minutes and agreement. He also pretended to be Yu Guohong and signed the agreement.

His purpose in writing these articles is to use the illusion of collective branch behavior to cover up his personal corruption! After Li xx withdrew the 230,000 yuan again, he did not return the money to Liao Lixin and Li Shengliang, but was embezzled by him again.

The 230,000 yuan loan from Liao Lixin and Li Shengliang will be repaid by the community collectively! The city government compensated the community with 700,000 yuan, but only 500,000 yuan was received. Li xx used various means to steal two 230,000 yuan and another 80,000 yuan for a total of 510,000 yuan. Yuan Zheng! Throughout the entire incident, his corruption became more and more courageous, and his methods became more and more subtle! May I ask the mayor? Is the expropriation compensation under the reasonable association law an "income-generating" economy?

Should the expropriation compensation that the collective should receive should be allowed to private individuals to receive a 30% rebate as a commission? Does the expropriation compensation paid to the community through normal channels according to the minutes of the municipal government meeting require a private agent and payment of fees? As a community worker, can Li xx receive additional compensation for his work within the scope of his duties? Should Li xx’s unscrupulous and bold corruption be severely punished by party discipline and state law?

2. Payments were made in disguised form in project payments for the construction of community office buildings to obtain private distribution of huge amounts of collective money

After zoning adjustment, the original Tielu Village of Wuli Township was divided into: In the two communities of Gujing and Lijiachong, when the zoning was adjusted, the office building in the original Tielu Village (now the Gujing Building) was under construction. According to the agreement, the two communities will each receive half of the completed office building, and each party will bear half of the construction costs. .

Due to the zoning adjustment, Lijiachong Community and Gujing Community were affiliated to Sanyanqiao Office and Wulipai Office respectively. To be cautious, the construction cost of the office building was audited by the District Discipline Inspection Commission, which took the lead. Shen Xiaochu is the former deputy secretary of the District Discipline Inspection Commission.

The total construction cost of the audited office building was 4.2 million yuan. The audit results were recognized by the District Commission for Discipline Inspection, Lijiachong Community, Gujing Community and the infrastructure construction party, and were supported by all members of the neighborhood committees and the infrastructure construction party. Signature confirmation and handover procedures of the office building were completed.

The two communities each bear 2xx million yuan of the total cost of 4.2 million yuan. Before the zoning adjustment, the original Tielulu Village had paid 1.3 million yuan to the infrastructure construction party. In fact, each community should pay 1.45 million yuan. That's fine, but without collective discussion in the Lijiachong community, under the control of Li xx, he privately signed a false supplementary agreement with the infrastructure boss, and based on the false agreement, the community *** paid the infrastructure owner He paid 2.7 million yuan and still owes 200,000 yuan.

Changed direction and paid more than xx million yuan! In the case that the handover has been completed and no new construction has been completed, why is it that the same office building has the same half size and the same audit results? We question why the project fees paid by Lijiachong Community and Gujing Community are different?

Why can Li xx easily change the audit results approved by many parties under the leadership of the District Commission for Discipline Inspection without any seriousness? Why can't others see the supplementary agreement? What’s even more strange is that every payment in Lijiachong Community is handled by Li xx himself, without the need for anyone from the infrastructure construction company or the community’s financial staff?

And all payments are in cash? For example, on the evening of January 3, 20xx, Li xx paid a one-time project payment of 800,000 yuan to the infrastructure boss after borrowing money from abroad. However, during the entire payment process, Li Qiuhua, the community financial accountant, neither saw the money borrowed by Li xx. I haven’t seen how Li xx paid the construction fee to the infrastructure construction party? All she got was a receipt from Li xx! May I ask the mayor? Does the financial discipline of the community allow such chaos?

Is the financial disclosure of Lijiachong Community true? The whereabouts of the over 1 million yuan that I paid are unknown. Can I check who took it? Is anyone responsible for Li xx's crazy fraud, illegal and corrupt behavior?

3. Buying collective assets at a low price, harming the public and enriching private interests, resulting in the loss of community assets and huge economic losses

There are 8 golden storefronts on the street of Bazhong in the city owned by the Lijiachong community. 8 storefronts The average assessed value in 20xx was 520,000 yuan per unit, with a total value of 4 million yuan.

At the end of 20xx, without collective discussion, Li xx used these 8 storefronts as collateral to borrow 1.4 million yuan, with a high interest rate of 3 cents.

By the beginning of 20xx, Li xx bought the storefronts to the borrower at a price of 200,000 yuan each, and also paid the borrower 75% interest on the loan at a high interest rate of 3 cents.

60,000 yuan, which means that these 8 storefronts, worth at least 520,000 yuan each, were eventually bought at a bargain price of about 80,000 yuan each! The borrowers and the people who bought the storefront are both Li xx himself and his younger brother Li Yuejun (if you don’t believe it, just ask among the storefront operators).

These golden facades worth more than 4 million yuan were easily turned into the property of Li xx and his brother at a price of more than 600,000 yuan! May I ask the mayor, can our party and government tolerate Li xx’s behavior? Where is the justice of his behavior that harms the public and enriches his own private life? Where is the party discipline and state law?

Mayor Sheng, Li xx was given a serious warning within the party by the District Discipline Inspection Commission in 20xx for corruption and false accusations against others. What I have reported above are all facts, and the evidence is conclusive! These are just some of Li xx’s violations of discipline and law, and corruption! I will continue to report in the future. If it is not true, I will bear full legal responsibility! I fully believe that you are a good leader, and I also believe that the party's policies will severely crack down on and deal with the "fly" Li xx!

Lijiachong community resident: Jiang Sheng

Report letter from the village secretary on xx, xx, 20xx 2

Dear relevant leaders at all levels:

Regarding the report of corruption by the head of XX Town, XX Village, XX City, here are just a few typical examples:

1. Voter bribery: Give each voter a pack of good cigarettes before the election to ask for "help" ".

2. Fraud: The widow of the clan brother Chen Qianzhong had no intention of demolishing or rebuilding the dilapidated house, but she reported it to the town civil administration in vain for the "compensation" of 2,000 yuan (the account was collected by Chen Diyuan on her behalf) ).

3. Blackmail: After I received the demolition compensation of 750 yuan on my behalf, I was asked to collect it again. I only acknowledged it after signing and confirming it (see the original receipt), but I was forced to withhold 50 yuan. "Fruit Fee" (see original receipt).

4. Deception: Take a video of the temporary water accumulation on a deserted mountain next to the village and report it as a "flood" to your superiors for help.

5. Betting: Every day, a white car is driven around to find people to set up bets with poker or chess, and hundreds of dollars are thrown away in public to Chen Jingyi, a person with no capital.

6. Cowardice: When I heard that I was not getting along with my wife and wanted to divorce and marry another, I came to encourage him and said: "If you do this, the village will award you 10,000 yuan.

7. Dereliction of duty: Chen Jianhua, a lonely old villager who was about to become completely blind, came to him to ask for the "Five Guarantees". After seeing that he was disrespectful, he deliberately avoided him dozens of times, making him so angry that he wanted to jump into the river.

8. Asking for bribes. : When the daughter-in-law and granddaughter are one month old, all factories, schools, and farmers are called one by one to give gifts, make a lot of money (check the original gift book), and hold banquets in restaurants to show off their power.

Poor people like me. Those who didn't go were attacked, and Zheng Zuwei and himself were beaten in public because of this (the town did nothing to deal with it, but paid for his treatment to help the murder).

9. For many years, they have occupied the public house site (see the Xinqiaotou scene)

10. Insulting the farmers as "low-class people carrying dung buckets"

The above facts can be verified with the masses. There are still a few years left in the term of office, and we still don’t know how much state assets we will defraud and how many good people will be harmed. Therefore, we strongly demand that we eliminate the bad apples among the cadres as soon as possible, eliminate the bad influence, and re-establish the decent image of the party and the government among the people.

Reporter: Chen XXcheng, a villager in this village

Mobile phone: 13797XXXX Telephone: XXXXXXX

Report letter 3 from the village secretary on X month X day of X year

Since we Since his real-name report on Feng Kaichun, secretary of Qianping Village, Houping Town, Baokang County, Xiangfan City, Hubei Province, he broke the law and violated discipline, he has received great attention from the Baokang County Commission for Discipline Inspection.

However, the final investigation was aborted due to the interference of some human factors (among them, Tang Zhongkui, deputy secretary of the Houping Town Party Committee and Secretary of the Discipline Inspection Commission, was inextricably linked to this matter. The Qianping Village resident Team leader Li Anxi has also received a large amount of kickbacks).

/p>

Located in a group of Tieyangshu temples in Qianping Village, it is close to more than 30 acres of riverside mountain land along Provincial Highway 305. It has been ruthlessly leased to the county highway by Feng Kaichun, secretary of the Qianping Village branch, and others for a period of 20 years. section (actually it is personal investment under the banner of highway section to achieve the purpose of enclosure).

The cost is only about 220,000.

The actual land used by the villagers who should be registered here is less than 8 acres, and the remaining 20 acres are collectively owned.

If normal procedures are followed, the village committee’s financial accounts should have a balance of more than 170,000 yuan after paying off the compensation to eight households. However, the village committee currently needs to pay back the compensation when leasing this land. There is a deficit on the books.

What’s more, nearly half of the compensation was provided by Gong Yonghua, the lessee of the project here.

For example: a group of villagers: Wang Zhaoqin only registered a few points of land, but the actual one-time compensation he received from Feng Kaichun was 25,000 yuan.

However, the accounts of the village committee showed that the amount he received was 12,000 yuan, and Party Secretary Feng asked Gong Yonghua to add another 10,000 yuan in compensation to facilitate the settlement of accounts.

(Although there are two accounts, the 25,000 yuan is a one-time cash payment from Feng Kaichun)

(Note: The project payment is more than 400,000 yuan, of which 22 Ten thousand yuan is from the village committee's formal financial account, and the other more than 180,000 yuan is from Gong Yonghua.

The following questions:

1. Such a large area of ??land. After renting, the village had no balance and even incurred debts.

2. Without the consent of the village committee and the village representatives, Shanzi signed an agreement privately with the other party by not going to work in the name of taking sick leave. , and deceived 8 farmers into signing agreements.

3. There was no public bidding, and the land was rented to the so-called highway section at a low price in the competition.

There were many people who wanted to rent this land and the rent was high. Higher than this price, for example: Li Shihe, a villager from Group 5 of Qianping Village (13871772732, flight number: 5760139)

4. Please organize to find out the specific direction of the black and white accounts.

Note: The formal account of Qianping Village Committee and the favor account in the hands of Gong Yonghua

(The so-called "favor account" is actually the rent here, Feng Kaichun's accountant and Gong Yonghua's official cash)

5. The specific details of the income of the eight households.

I hope that the leaders will investigate the actual income and the income of the eight households.

6. Knowing that the construction of the project here. It will endanger the lives and property of the villagers of Qianping Group 4 and the safety of more than 40 acres of fertile land.

7. If someone asks about the situation of this place, Feng Kaichun will say: The rental of this place is considered. What? Is it comparable to the sale of a piece of land on Houping Street? He Guangbing proposed to buy it out for 180,000 yuan, and negotiated with government leaders many times but failed to reach an agreement. The main leaders of the Houping Town Government, Liu Deyu and Tang Zhongkui, sold the property to their family members at a low price of 60,000 yuan without convening any party committee and government meetings.

I and Secretary Tang and Liu.

I am not afraid of suing... not to mention that I am still the current county people's congress representative!

8. Whenever I encounter the legality and fairness of the project, When there is doubt about sex, Secretary Feng will say: Call the police and let the police arrest the person and threaten to intimidate the people.

As village collective land, it should be used in accordance with the relevant land use laws. Villagers’ representatives will discuss the specific use of collective land and issue announcements to inform the general public.

However, as the head of the common people, this is not the case. Instead, he goes his own way and uses concealment methods to deprive the common people of their right to know.

If the land use is to be changed in accordance with relevant regulations, an application for land change registration must be submitted to the land administration department of the government at or above the county level where the land is located with the approval document, and the original land registration authority will register the change in accordance with the law.

After the overall land use plan of a township (town) is approved in accordance with the law, the township (town) government shall announce it within its own administrative region.

The announcement shall include the following contents:

(1) Planning objectives.

(2) Planning deadline.

(3) Planning scope.

(4) Land use.

(5) Approval authority and date of approval.

Units and individuals are prohibited from engaging in land development activities in prohibited reclamation areas determined in the overall land use plan.

As the party secretary/director of Qianping Village, he completely ignores the existence of laws and regulations, insists on going his own way, and enriches his own pockets.

The survival and interests of the common people are disregarded.

If you are one of our own people, you will make more and false reports. If you are not our own people, you will not even want to give the most basic compensation.

Where is the truth?

According to the "Land Management Law of the People's Republic of China": the content of land registration and the format of land ownership certificates are uniformly stipulated by the land administration department of the State Council.

Land registration information is publicly available for inquiry.

As ordinary people in Qianping Village, it is impossible to know the whereabouts of the collective money. Even if individuals want to know, the village cadres will use various excuses.

Furthermore, we point out that Feng Kaichun, without consulting any villagers in Qianping Village in advance, rented out the Tieyangshu Temple Mountain Field owned by a group of collectives in Qianping Village to a company for the construction of the so-called " "Emergency Center" warehouse is used (in fact, it can be changed to other more suitable places. Building a warehouse here will seriously pollute the air and drinking water in Qianping Village, and cause serious damage to the highway). Feng Kaichun is purely to collect benefits.

They did not consider the feelings of our villagers at all, and secretly withheld the price difference. What is even more disgusting is that in order to protect their legitimate rights and interests, four groups of villagers in Qianping Village clashed with the company many times, almost leading to conflicts. Feng Kaichun not only refused to communicate and explain, but instead threatened, intimidated, and induced four groups of villagers in Qianping Village. He also said that if the four groups of villagers continued to block the construction, even if the corresponding departments at higher levels had dike construction indicators in the future, they would rather not build the embankment plan. This embankment will be built for it.

As the newly appointed village party secretary and village director, it makes us feel incredible that Jingran is so unreasonable? Feng Kaichun has seriously violated the "Organic Law of the Village Committees of the People's Republic of China" and is suspected of serious dereliction of duty.

According to the provisions of Chapter 4, Article 24, Paragraph 2, of my country's "Village Committee Organization Law", major matters involving the interests of villagers must be discussed and decided by the villagers' representative meeting before they can be handled.

There are countless illegal practices like this without the consent of the villagers, the villagers representatives, and the village and branch committees.

Furthermore, the rent/sale funds were not given to Qianping Village, and no one except the parties involved knew where the funds went.

With these conclusive facts, shouldn’t they be held accountable?

We believe in the party and the government.

“Strive to strengthen anti-corruption and promote integrity, and establish a new image of Qianping Village that is honest, diligent and thrifty.” This is also the latest speech of the new leader.

All of us villagers only want the truth. Who can give us a true explanation?

According to Article 6 of the "Land Management Law", when land is acquired for national construction, the land-using unit shall pay land acquisition fees according to the following standards.

Except as otherwise stipulated by the state, no unit or individual may raise or lower the standards without government approval, nor may they charge fees or impose other conditions on any excuse other than those specified in these Measures.

However, Feng Kaichun and others ignored the law: the Zhang family was compensated at the standard of 300 yuan/mu, while the Li family was compensated at the standard of 500 yuan/mu, and even more amazingly, the Wang family was compensated at the standard of 1,300 yuan/mu. Compensation will be based on yuan/mu standard.

As a result, wars and smoke filled the air between neighbors, and they were suspicious of each other and competing with each other to see who had a good relationship with the party secretary and who was ruthless in order to get more compensation.

It has become the most important factor affecting public security and social stability at the grassroots level, and will also affect future economic development (what kind of construction can Qianping Village be able to carry out in the future with such a high compensation price?).

Because the local villagers’ cultural quality is not high and their legal concept is extremely weak.

And the power in the hands of village cadres is relatively concentrated.

Illegal land sales are often successful.

Some people work hard and use all means to become village cadres. Their purpose is to carry out orders once they have the power, use their power to seek benefits for themselves and their supporters, and use the village collective property Treat it as your own property and sell it if you want.

According to current regulations, land compensation fees belong to rural collective economic organizations.

The land administration departments of the municipal and county governments shall, based on the approved land requisition plan, work with relevant departments to formulate land requisition compensation and resettlement plans, announce them in the townships (towns) and villages where the requisitioned land is located, and listen to Opinions of rural collective economic organizations and farmers whose land has been expropriated.

Due to the imperfection of villagers’ autonomy and village affairs disclosure system, for the “village officials” of our village, land compensation has become a “discretionary” disposable income. This move of “official land sales” is driven by strong interests.

As for the relevant government departments, in order to improve the "efficiency" of land acquisition, some Houping Town government leaders may acquiesce and connive with "village officials" to forge or defraud villagers' signatures, and selectively listen to "the accused". The opinions of the rural collective economic organizations that requisitioned land" ignored and ignored the opinions of the majority of farmers whose land was requisitioned.

The above is not just conjecture.

According to reports, a village cadre in a certain place in Hebei forged a "meeting minutes" signed by village representatives, concealed the truth, and sold the collective land. It took two years for the villagers who were kept in the dark to discover the problem.

Relevant local departments said, “When our bureau submits collection documents, it only reviews and confirms whether it meets the quorum of village representatives and the proportion of legal signatures.

Our bureau has no power to "There are no errors in the land expropriation and land requisition procedures for this plot of land." "Since the list of villagers' signatures for voting is provided by the village committee, it is suggested that the authenticity of the signatures be raised. The village committee is responsible for the interpretation."

In the pale excuse, the conspiracy of interests is clearly revealed.

The current local-related petitions and the resulting mass incidents have become an important hidden danger to grassroots harmony and stability (the Wukan incident in Lufeng, Guangdong).

It is urgent to severely punish the illegal land sales by "village officials" and correct the pretentious "procedural review" of relevant departments.

"Village officials selling land" not only impacts the order of rural land management and threatens the red line of cultivated land, but also seriously infringes on farmers' rights and affects grassroots harmony and stability. It should be severely cracked down.

Now the village representatives elected by all the villagers have made three demands to the government, requesting the higher-level government to return a natural and harmonious living environment to the local people:

1. Special request for approval from the leaders The judicial department opened the case for investigation without alerting Houping Town government officials (to prevent them from colluding with those involved in the case to make false accounts).

2. Request that eight households of villagers be questioned individually during the investigation: How much compensation did the village committee directly give to each household? How much money did Feng then instruct Gong Yonghua to give? How much compensation should be given to each household that Feng promised but did not dare to pay? We sincerely request the leaders to investigate the village committee officials after clarifying the compensation details for these eight households.

(A group of eight villagers: Li Zhifu, Wang Zhaoqin, Wang Fengjun, Wang Fengzhang, Chen Shenghua, Li Zhiguo, Li Dewang, and Li Deshun.

3. The villagers who received the most compensation in this compensation It’s Wang Zhaoqin and Wang Fengjun, more than a thousand yuan per mu per year.

(Wang Zhaoqin disappeared after receiving the compensation.) How much did Wang Zhaoqin get now? Where is Wang Fenghua’s wife Huang Xiaomin now? .

Wang Fengzhang’s daughter Wang Zhaofen also knows and can get in touch with her.

4. Please audit and inspect the village finance of Qianping Village and make the village affairs public. , Finance.

On April 28, 2012, when the people continued to report and the investigation failed, Feng Kaichun paid Baokang’s publicity media to report on it. "Great achievements" is nothing more than a false shot in order to confuse the people's sense of right and wrong and to cover up individual leaders who reached out due to greed in this incident.

Another self-directed and self-acted drama created for the purpose.

We don’t understand why the people’s repeated reports are like a sea of ??stone. Why, in today’s legal society, the people of Qianping Village have no one. Do you have any right to know? Are these the people of Qianping Village in Houping Town who live in a society where they shout "human rights" every day? Or is it because Li Anxi is a government cadre (a cadre stationed in Qianping Village) and is protected by officials? What about his network of connections? Or is it because Feng Kaichun is a wealthy coal boss (now a pig farmer) and uses money to bribe leaders who are greedy for money? So did so many leaders of Houping Town Government accept money? In this way, the cadres stationed in the army and the coal boss are protected.

Looking at the slogan "Governing mediocrity and accountability" at the door of the government, the people don't know where the government's credibility lies, and where are their actions as a government? How can we summarize their repeated inactions of ignoring people’s reports by saying “the administrative inaction of the Houping Town Government’s Discipline Inspection Commission”? What if such people could often appear in the public eye on television or in public media such as newspapers? If so, what kind of public image is being established? A positive one?

I would like to ask the leaders, a person who started his career as a coal digger has such a bad character. What qualifications do you have to be a deputy to the National People's Congress?

Aren't you risking the livelihood of all the people?

The people in the village are here to implore the superiors to not show favoritism and return the favor. We, the people, have the truth.

Thank you for the good news!

The informed people of Qianping Village, Houping Town

20XX-4-21