The wellhead of oil and gas drilling is only 70m away from my home, which poses a safety threat. What should I do?

It is safe to be more than 50 meters away from my opinion. Your home is more than 70 meters, which is different from the national regulations.

From an expert's point of view, what do you mean by influence? Just like those people who laid wires on the roof in ancient times said that the wires were struck by lightning, what should I do if my household appliances were struck by lightning? It's equally funny and boring.

You must know that accidents and normal operations are completely different, because it is possible, so there is no legal basis for saying that accidents are dangerous. You will not bring benefits, but make officials think you are shallow and ignorant.

Either you don't like it or it's reasonable, so first of all, it's difficult to discuss. First, the lion opened his mouth and tried to make them pay some money.

If they engage in the official operation of national policies, you can only make trouble or even find women and so on, sit on the ground and cry, and forbid them to transport materials and so on. The most important thing is to unite with your village and force the country to lose money to you, which will definitely have an effect.

If they misbehave, they might as well threaten to sue them for hacking, and they can get the money.

On the contrary, I think you are a bit like the kind of person who wants to get a ticket when any pipe or wire passes through your accessories.

But I am still on your side, because the country is too rich and the farmers are too poor.

Legally speaking, you can't win a lawsuit, because policies and regulations are formulated by the state, even by the oil industry. Every year, internal experts put forward opinions to prepare adjustment specifications, and you can even organize experts to discuss changing policies because of your uproar. From a technical point of view, you can't win the argument of experts in their industry.

You can only threaten to use it. Remember to call the village head and organize a group of people. You can't do it alone.

Remember that the lion's mouth requires the delivery pipeline to pass through your village, how much to collect, how much to use in the open space and so on. You must negotiate with the village chief. Wait!

Everyone I know is doing related work, and farmers often intervene to ask for money during construction. No matter how my friends promote the safety and rationality of technology, no one understands it and still speaks with his own point of view.

Actually, it's all about money. I understand that my friends often meet the village chief and ask for money.

Because, after all, it's not personal money, and it's easy to need state money. As long as your village head fights and says that the construction area affects life, it's reasonable not to let them use any inch of land in your village, and not to use it without paying money.

As for your personal intention to sue them technically, I personally look like a joke.

Your statement has no chance of winning in front of experts and the law.

My personal opinion has no legal basis and effect.

I'm sorry, I didn't mean it personally. It's purely personal.

What I want to say is why there is such a saying as 100 meter?

Because there are rules.

Why is there such a rule? It was formulated by experts in the oil industry.

If you use this rule, you can discuss it with experts.

If it is really a legal way, experts in the oil industry can explain 11,000 ways without 100 meters and only 70 meters, or they can come up with 1,000 ways to prove that their current practice is reasonable.

China petroleum China petrifaction

You know, your so-called 100 meter is based on so-called experts, so you are really taking legal channels.

Really find out those experts, they are all paid employees in the oil sector. They come out to tell you what measures can be taken when the distance is less than 100 meters, and then tell you that it is safe to do so.

Can you still argue with the people who set the standards?

So I said, you should dispute through legal channels from a technical point of view, and you will lose.

I have friends in this industry, so I watch more.

Judging from the real situation, after all, others are professionals, and it is safe for others to tell you. You amateur, you can't win no matter how unsafe you say. Your so-called insecurity really has no legal effect.

Even if your so-called mining is dangerous, you have no basis, no data and no technical parameters. You can't win unless you have a political background.

So I'll tell you directly that the truth didn't mean to hurt you sarcastically. Reality is so helpless.

You really need to prove that they have security risks and are in line with the legal basis. The way is to find the expert group, and then prove that they are unsafe and illegal in the form of technical specifications issued by the expert group, instead of saying that a certain item is not in conformity from your personal point of view.

The truth is so helpless that personal interests are hard to safeguard.

On the contrary, I began to say that it is easier and simpler to come forward as a village head and pay the fees required by the government to compensate the land of other occupied and affected villages, because the project has precedents.

I'm no expert.

Pure personal opinion, without any legal basis and reference.

thank you

The question is not like the following friend iambillbil, who claims to be an expert: "My opinion is that it is safe to be more than 50 meters away, and your home is more than 70 meters away from the national regulations", but thank you for your frank answer!

The situation is not as you think, and the people are not necessarily as hateful as you think! I used to work in other places, but I just heard from my hometown folks that the drilling company bullied people and wanted to start work by force. I didn't read the relevant documents to the villagers or get the consent of the people! To make matters worse, in order to escape the suspicion of illegal construction, they even forged the construction drawing and marked the distance between the house and the wellhead as 100 meters, while the actual distance was only 70 meters! And lie to the people that it doesn't matter, if it does, we'll talk about it then! I want to ask: if there is a collision or a major accident, will the people still have a chance to come to them? If 50m has already met the national safety regulations, is it necessary for the drilling company to practise fraud?

On August 20, 2004, an expert consultation meeting on sulfur-containing technical standards was held in Beijing. Experts believe that "the distance between the wellhead and the house is not less than 100 m" is necessary, and 100 m is the minimum requirement that should be considered when arranging the well site. Try our friend here, iambillbil. What's your answer?

In fact, ordinary people are not as bad as you think. Do you want money or not? National enterprises such as drilling companies forge drawings, distort facts and deceive people. Why? Everyone with discerning eyes knows that they are not just trying to reduce production costs. Do they ignore national laws and regulations and the safety of ordinary people? Is such behavior ridiculous for ordinary people?

Your statement is still aimed at the accident.

In the legal discussion and your report to the leader

It is impossible to tell what will happen after the accident.

Because we can only talk about the consequences of normal use and so on.

Just like you can't point to the wires at home and say that I get an electric shock if the wires leak.

Or when Nepal petitioned, he said that if the well leaked, all of us in the village would die.

These statements really can't be used as a basis, and the more vigorously they are spoken, the less likely they are to win.

So we can only say that there are security risks. If you report a safety problem, you must prove it according to the current legal procedures, and you only intend to point to 100 meters to win.

That's why I keep saying that. This has always been the case.

You know, the benefits of mining are relatively large, and the top leaders are all based on political achievements.

I don't suggest that you take the statement that an accident may threaten life safety as an argument for asking for help from leaders or the law.

So I still suggest that you contact the village head and villagers to make demands, and so on. It is estimated that the success may be very low, but at least reasonable compensation can be obtained.

Personal advice has no legal basis and responsibility.