A joke that satirizes lazy politics

Criticism of the "snail award" is actually an exhortation, and the fact that the "award-winning" unit can win the award clearly shows its confidence and determination to improve its work.

The picture comes from the internet.

In fact, the "Snail Award" has been held for the fourth time in Jinyun County. The "Snail Award" was awarded to the Water Administration Section of the County Water Conservancy Bureau and the relocation project special group of Shuning Hospital. At the award ceremony, the person in charge of the relevant unit accepted the "Snail Award" medal, and then made a speech on positive improvement. Some media reporters reported on the spot. The award of "Snail Award" quickly spread on the Internet and was widely discussed.

The picture comes from the internet.

Obviously, the "snail award" is a criticism of the "award-winning" unit's procrastination and inefficiency. It is a bitter irony to award prizes. Jinyun County can award such an award to its relevant government departments and invite reporters to report, which can be described as "washing its dirty linen in public". However, it is through examination and reflection that we can change what we know and focus on solving problems when we find them. Then, two award-winning units, the county water conservancy bureau, are dragging their work and the relocation project of Shuning Hospital is progressing slowly. I believe that they are brave after shame and can rectify their work style in a targeted manner.

The picture comes from the internet.

In addition, the setting of the "Snail Award" in Jinyun County is also a way to practice the openness of government affairs and a manifestation of consciously accepting the supervision of the masses. The evaluation of government work can show backwardness in such a humorous and self-deprecating way, and can also create a good image of a service-oriented government and improve people's trust in the government to a certain extent.

However, as an innovative form of self-criticism, the "snail award" should really play its role in rectifying problems and avoid being reduced to "formalism" and showing off. I hope that after the "Snail Award" is awarded, it can supervise the rectification work of the winning units and consciously accept the "acceptance" of the rectification work by the masses. In addition, in addition to the two award-winning units, other government departments should also see if there is a "snail" style, and if there is, encourage reform.

Finally, such a novel form of national self-criticism can be learned and used for reference by other places according to their own actual conditions. In short, awarding the "snail award" is not the purpose, but the purpose and expectation of the masses are to identify the pain points of work, rectify the work style and build a service-oriented government work team.