Who is afraid? How to evaluate Peng Jiasheng?

Who really hurt the courage? Opinions vary. It is said that it is Chairman Peng's own reason; It is said to be the Burmese military government; It is said that it is chairman Bai; Say China; Some people say it's America. Alas, just like the mysterious golden triangle is still foggy every day, the above problems can not be explained or explained clearly in one or two sentences. There are many reasons, big and small, external and internal. In short, we should look at the essence through the phenomenon. Above aside, now I will make my own comments on Peng Jiasheng, the aggressive king. Undeniably, Peng Jiasheng has contributed to the development of brave economy and brave nation. But now some people's evaluation of Peng Jiasheng is a bit incredible. I can't believe it. Is it really "the wall falls down and everyone pushes"? Those who are courageous should remember that Chairman Peng, who grew up in the military career, made many speeches on how to develop the courageous economy in peacetime. Every time he talks about how to adapt to the modern management and political life environment in peacetime, combined with the boldness of reality, he always shouts like Hong Zhong, "Now many cadres just want to enjoy themselves in peacetime, and seem to have developed a sheep's character, lacking wolf and bloodiness. If they develop boldly with such a character, how much cohesion and creativity can they have? " This is also the only bargaining chip that he has been warning or negotiating with the government not to lay down his arms as a negotiation condition. How to unite and organize people to form cohesion and combat effectiveness? How to develop strategically? How can we broaden the bold prospects? Wait, I think this is something that a leader thinks about every day. Otherwise, Peng Jiasheng could not have been king for so long. Every speech made by President Peng is full of piety and passion, expressing his sincere love for the brave nation and his infinite respect and loyalty to China. Moreover, he introduced his life experience and the history of the courageous nation more than once. He thanked China, especially Yunnan, for their support to Kokang over the years. I also thank China businessmen for their bold investment. You come and develop boldly, and I will let you make money! This is a sentence he often talks about. Alas! I would also like to make an offensive remark here: the Kokang people are absolutely wolf-like to Myanmar's military government, but some China people living in Kokang and northern Myanmar are absolutely wolf-like to Kokang people or China people. There is absolutely no fabricated component in the above. I believe that all courageous people know something about Peng's ruling style and the courageous behavior of some China businessmen or literati. At that time, I came into contact with many courageous people and China people who came to be courageous, but I have never seen anyone dare to openly disrespect Peng Jiasheng and make any criticism. And understanding, let me believe more thoroughly: At that time, Peng Jiasheng was an invincible god in the hearts of brave people! You didn't know how high the political day was until you got in touch with courage and North Myanmar. How deep and turbid is the water? How high and thick is the sky? How deep and shallow is the water? These are not things that our people want to consider. Some people do it because they are interested at most. There is no reason and no reason. For example, I just need to express my confusion and present it. Ignorant people are fearless, but I think what I said today should also be an attitude of exchange and learning. Since it is learning and communication, I think even if I am wrong, everyone will not laugh. People born in our time, who wants to really understand history? Most of us know the so-called history from textbooks, and we are what they say. Sadly, in the past textbooks and news media, you can't see any brief introduction to Kokang and North Myanmar. All I know from movies and TV shows are "pornography, gambling and drugs" and "underworld". Use this one-sided thing to frame our thoughts and use thinking to determine our judgment on an event. It is not surprising to get different comments from Chairman Peng and Chairman Bai. Why do many people still don't understand the true face of courage? For example, half a month before the courageous incident, I found many wrong places in the jar and secretly guessed that courageous was going to have a big event. Sure enough, a few days later, a war that shocked the world made the whole world summon up courage together. Many media and military strategists laughed and said that they had heard of this courage for the first time. Dare to be recovered or recovered by the Burmese military government? I don't blame the Burmese army, and I won't berate Chairman Bai. But I'm not afraid to blame Chairman Peng and Peng Jia for the loss. How to say that the incident of doing good deeds is not Peng Jiasheng's personal affair? How can some people just blame Peng Jiasheng? Even if he did something wrong in his later years, don't blame his courage and failure. I sometimes think that the charm of Peng Jiasheng lies in his spirit of daring to do something. If he comes back or dares to say it, only he has the courage to write it down. We can also imagine who is specifically responsible for courage, directing response or secretly planning the war that killed courage, and which political faction will it be? So many people, who will take responsibility? Here, on the contrary, I understand Peng Jiasheng's self-reflection after the defeat: his so-called mistake, or his failure this time, is because he didn't understand the above intentions. In addition, the following people did not follow his idea; The second mistake was that he knew clearly that he had used the wrong person. Looking back, if we are bold now. Let's not talk about whether the courageous rule of the Burmese military government is correct and legal. It is not to say that Chairman Bai is still making bold decisions for the development of social stability and national unity under the circumstances of humiliation and burden. I don't want to talk about Chairman Peng's national spirit and the spirit of "no one will think if we don't dare to give the people a hard time". Sometimes I also wonder: on the basis of mutual respect and friendship, which leader can stand up the national backbone without bowing his head? Maybe not, maybe! In my mind, the standard for evaluating the image of a courageous leader is: do you regard the people as human beings and the people as heroes who promote historical development? Can we make the courageous people rich and strong and give them a sense of belonging? In short, the great men of a country and a nation are not self-appointed and artificially promoted political stars, but are measured by the people. The previous craze for worshipping Peng Jiasheng was not an official position, but more from the people. I believe there will be brave people with consciousness. At least Peng Jiasheng is a national leader who once appeared in the Kokang area. Nowadays, some courageous people's attention to politics has long been replaced by economic consciousness. Some people are dissatisfied with the current government or the rule of Myanmar and call for the spirit of Peng Jiasheng, which is only a process of "political fading out" and "cultural highlighting". Nowadays, people pay more attention to Peng Jiasheng's memory, which comes from the people, from the bottom and from people's true hearts. For us uninspired outsiders, to interpret Peng Jiasheng or comment on Bai Suocheng is to understand a real Peng Jiasheng and evaluate a real Bai Suocheng. We should sort out the historical truth and the ins and outs of events from the perspective of people, not from the perspective of God. I think the people think the leader is great because he only has the people in his heart. People can't kill people who have others in their hearts. (Hint: The above remarks only represent personal opinions and do not represent any organization or political faction. Please don't sit in the corresponding seats. )