Hundreds of villagers in Zhejiang were demolished as soon as they moved into their new homes. Why is the urban reform planning so troublesome?

No matter what the speed, as long as the relocation subsidy is in place in time, the demolition money will be paid in time. During the loss, timely compensation. The people are still willing. As for whether the taxpayer's money has been spent, it is because the supervision is unreasonable, resulting in the waste of state-owned resources. This is a high-level matter and has little to do with ordinary people. Ordinary people can't manage it even if they want to.

Moreover, China's urban planning and road planning are really chaotic, and the only excuse is that it is developing too fast. It seems that rapid development has become the most reasonable excuse for these unreasonable specifications and waste of state-owned resources.

The road just built today will be paved tomorrow, and the subway will be built the day after tomorrow. Such things are being staged all over the country.

We can understand that this is the inevitable result of development. The planner has no responsibility at all?

Yesterday's plan was not completed and the planner was transferred. Today's new planners, as soon as they came, denied yesterday's planning and changed to today's construction. Tomorrow he's gone again, and tomorrow's plans are coming again. Tomorrow's planner came, and he immediately changed today's plan. The planner will come the day after tomorrow, and we will make plans for tomorrow another day. The incumbent is always right, and the past is always wrong.

In addition, there is a communication problem between different places. Some time ago, there was a big laugh saying that it was two stations on the Hanyi high-speed railway. Xiantao City built Xiantao Station on the edge of Qianjiang City, and Tianmen City built high-speed railway station on the edge of Xiantao City. Every place is competing for benefits, and what wonderful things will happen. Obviously, it is a straight road, and you have to turn a corner in a city market, otherwise it will not be approved. Planners are also constrained by various forces.

Do these plans waste less resources? Is it still an example? Do people in the country always have to pay for these plans?

Can't China introduce a planning bill? It is used to prevent the waste of planning and prevent all forces from affecting planning. Can't the responsibility of planning be determined by people?

Can't such urban planning and road traffic planning be entrusted to academic institutions?

Maybe China's urban construction and road construction must be done by local leaders?

Must the achievements of China officials be accomplished on the basis of changing others?

Is there really no one to hold accountable for the waste caused by these chaotic plans?

Isn't this corruption?