Children attending remedial classes is a manifestation of parents' laziness. what do you think?

This question depends on the situation.

The first is really lazy. I know a mother who plays mahjong, mobile phones and watches TV all day, and her children have nothing to eat when they come home. Studying at home? No way, I have to come back and cook dinner for my mother, especially since my mother knows nothing and has to tell me what to do.

Spend some money, send it to the training class, the children's dinner is solved, and the homework is assisted by the teacher, so you can play with peace of mind.

This kind of parents are lazy.

Parents are children's mirrors, and children are parents' replicas. Such parents, even if they spend more money to send their children to remedial classes, will not achieve the desired results.

There is also a kind of laziness, that is, I am afraid that I can't control my emotions. Regarding tutoring children's homework, there are popular premature ovarian failure and popular heart stents. There are countless jokes about tutoring homework on the Internet.

It is really difficult to help children do their homework and be calm.

Such parents suggest reading Rona Reiner's Don't Yell and try to change yourself according to the contents in the book. After all, tutoring homework is also parent-child time.

Second, work is too busy. When the children leave school, most office workers have not left work, so they have to send their children to remedial classes.

It is also a kind of helplessness to leave your job and can't afford to raise children.

However, being a parent has a validity period, so no matter how busy and tired you are, you should try to spend time with your children. Don't let the child call in his heart for too long without hearing a response.

Third, I can't help myself. Many parents have never read a book after work, what's more, children have learned a lot now, and many parents can't help.

There are professions, and professional things are given to professional people. If you teach it wrong, the child will be confused.

However, I also met a stay-at-home mom. Before her children went to primary school, she passed the teacher qualification exam, and she always learned what she wanted to learn one year in advance (there are many video tutorials on the Internet), instead of teaching children, she explained them when they sometimes needed to ask her.

Now my mother's children have graduated from primary school with good grades, and my mother has opened a remedial class by the way.

Therefore, a caring mother will never give up her growth and always seize the opportunity to create miracles. After all, children are both pressure and motivation. This phenomenon does exist. It is better than anything to throw a child into a remedial class. It would be much better to leave the child alone at home without worrying about his safety. Therefore, parents often have more willingness to attend remedial classes. Of course, some children do have hobbies in that field and are willing to go to remedial classes. Facts have proved that children who want to go have good learning effect, while children who go passively often have no obvious learning effect. This is why we spend so much time studying, and the results are obviously different. Parents often complain that going means not going, and learning means not learning.

Why are parents lazy? Parents can teach their children well. What do they want teachers to do? Now which family doesn't run around to support their families, how much spare time can they have to educate their children? How nice it would be to stay with the children for a while! At present, no boss advocates attending class 996. If so, which parent has time to take care of the family? It's easy to stand and talk!

No, there's also the theory of checking leaks and filling gaps. Although parents can coach and know right and wrong, they can't understand what is wrong.

First of all, this view is misleading. Give professional things to professional people. I am an English major in Grade 8, but I can't teach my children, because teaching itself is a major and needs to be systematic and scientific.

Teachers can teach students not because they have more knowledge than their parents, but because they can effectively teach their own knowledge to their children.

You may want to express the probability of laziness. With the training class, parents can ignore their children, but only take care of their studies.

In the past, parents had no education, and it was normal for children to rely on schools for cultural learning. Now, because many parents have a bachelor's degree or above, they have to teach culture classes by themselves, which is a retrogression in education.

Excellent parents can mold children with higher quality, and it is by no means that they give their children cultural lessons. This is what educators should do.

Lazy parents don't even bother to attend remedial classes! This statement is unfair to parents who have worked so hard to send their children to psychological counseling! Reason:

Parents are so wronged, okay? As a practitioner of a K 12 educational institution, I say responsibly that the parents I know are familiar with every subject of their children. They are proficient in various educational policies, spend a lot of time on their children's study, and also choose one-on-one tutoring, because this can make up the difference and cultivate excellent students. They will accurately put forward counseling needs and be meticulous to every knowledge point.

If children attending remedial classes is a sign of parents' laziness, is it a sign of parents' diligence that children don't attend remedial classes?

Participating in remedial classes varies from person to person, and students with poor learning ability may be helpful. It also depends on the teaching quality of remedial classes. I am not optimistic about remedial classes, because all remedial classes are aimed at making money, and education cannot be an industry aimed at making money. Recently, the country began to rectify the educational chaos. Educators will be dismissed if they disagree.

Taking remedial classes is not homework. English has one-on-one foreign teachers, and mathematics has an olympiad. From the fourth grade of primary school, mathematics and physics began from the junior high school curriculum.

Why do you want to attend a remedial class? Can't parents teach by themselves?

I think it's best for primary school students to learn well with the remedial class system and learn by themselves. It is easy to learn to become a hobby, fishing for three days and drying the net for two days.

However, parents must give counseling in advance, and relying entirely on remedial classes will not have good results. Do what you already know before class. Let's review the questions the teacher wants to talk about first. Often a class lasts one and a half hours, and preview takes more than three hours.

First talk about the concept, then let her think slowly, do it slowly, and come up with it by herself. I really won't say it again. The process of thinking is the most precious, but in class, it is passive and there is no preview. It is duck education, and the effect will not be good.

In class, the teacher will have more than a dozen test questions and answer them online. If they are not true, plus nervousness and limited time, they will answer wrong. Ten couples are super gods and mvp, which is a great encouragement to children. Children will concentrate on listening and answering questions. On several occasions, children cried for a long time because they didn't answer the questions and didn't get the mvp.

Looking at the performance of other children in the class, most of them have learned mvp in advance.

Now children love learning, have confidence in math and English, and often participate in competitions on behalf of the class. She thinks she is great and wants to be better. People often ask me the difference between learning God and learning hegemony. When I say that solving problems is a game, I learn from God, while solving problems is a task, I learn from tyrants.

Tutorial classes, such as Olympic Mathematics, are developed by many top mathematicians, which expand the training of thinking, follow the system, study on time, have incentives and supervision, and are definitely better than self-study. The real self-study is at least after high school, primary school and junior high school, and parents can't be shopkeepers of cutting.

To sum up, remedial classes and family education complement each other. According to the system, learning with children will definitely have a good effect. Parents have no sense of responsibility, regardless of throwing remedial classes, children can't keep up, they will only be at the bottom, hit, feel that they can't learn, don't understand, and lose confidence. They are on pins and needles in the remedial class every day. Parents will also say that they still can't learn well after spending so much money. The child's mood will definitely be more depressed.

Nowadays, remedial classes can be described as varied and all-encompassing, from art to sports, from programming to calligraphy. Only when parents have money and leisure can they accompany their children around after school and dress up as Dai Yue. I have to help with Chinese, math and cultural homework when I go home. Therefore, parents who can accompany their children to remedial classes are not lazy, but very responsible.

My family also has a lovely baby. I began to learn English at the age of four, language and Lego at the age of five, and programming at the age of seven. The remedial classes for babies are also inspected in many aspects. They are all well-known in the national chain. These institutions are very professional, which is much better than what my parents teach. On the contrary, I never have nothing in the future, and I don't intend to put my children in a trusteeship class. I have the energy to personally coach cultural classes and leave other majors to professional institutions.

More specifically-

This is a sign of parents' laziness.

Parents can be very diligent-they can act as "cash machines, drivers, bodyguards, supervisors and nannies", but they just don't want to use their brains, thinking that they can do a good job in their children's studies by paying the money and supervising themselves.