Is Harden and Paul suitable or is Paul and George more suitable?

Three people are most suitable together. Of course, this is a joke. If George really went to the rocket, then the rocket has established its own Big Three. As long as the ball is properly distributed and the playoffs are hard enough, you can become a five-star warrior.

After all, the Rockets have beaten the Warriors three times in the regular season without Paul George, and the most recent one was to beat the Five-Star Warriors without Harden.

Harden, Paul and George, if these three are matched together, only George can perfectly match and blend in, whether with Paul or Harden.

First of all, George doesn't need a ball. When he has no ball in his hand, he always runs without the ball, while the other two basically stand without the ball, or simply pick and roll and catch the ball and attack. Secondly, George works harder on the defensive end. Harden is often not active in frame defense, and only shows his power in top defense. George is different, he is always trying to defend, and the level of single defense and coordinated defense is very high. From this perspective, the answer is obvious. Since both Paul and Harden need the ball in their hands, matching them is bound to make sacrifices to each other, and George doesn't need the ball in his hand, then George and Paul must be more suitable than Harden and Paul!

But this is only one aspect, and we only discuss the problem from the point of view of ball distribution. In fact, we deliberately simplify the problem and default it to Harden and Paul, George and Paul's one-on-one hit! In fact, NBA professional teams are a complex system. Although it is purely offensive and defensive, the attack is centered on five people, and the defense is also uncooperative.

The most important thing is that people are not machines, but have two States: sufficient physical strength and exhaustion;

So when we see Harden and Paul playing together, although they need to sacrifice each other when they are strong, they can lead the team separately when they rotate.

And George, perhaps with Paul, doesn't need to sacrifice anything for the other side, but in the rotation stage, George's style of play is difficult to drive the whole team, so he just stormed by himself!

I mean, the combination of Paul and Harden, without any other players with the ball, can safely win three breakthroughs and former guards; And the combination of Paul and George, at least on the bench, must have an organizer. Considering this question from the perspective of NBA professional competition, the answer will not be so simple.

As far as suitability is concerned, players like George are always the most suitable players for major teams, with a balanced attack and defense, strong scoring ability and no need for the ball. After all, with a bully like Shao Wei, er, no, a superstar like Shao Wei who does everything, George can realize his highest value, not to mention others ~ ~ ~

But when it comes to the core of the duo, George and Paul are not necessarily comparable to Harden and Paul. Harden can pass the good ball in time and accurately to drive his teammates, but George is not good at it;

What determines the ultimate strength of these two duo is whether their teammates are suitable! ! ! As long as the style of play and function are not exactly the same, such as Rondo and Kidd, even a little conflict has nothing to do with the overall situation. After all, Harden and Paul can organize scores, which means that you organize me to score and you organize me to score.

So personally, I will probably choose Harden and Paul. After all, no one has seen George and Paul, and ideas are just ideas. Besides, where can I find a substitute teacher with good organizational skills now?