In the debate, I am the correct one: results are the standard for judging a student. Please help, I'm about to explode~_~

Academic performance is very important to students. For example, when new students enter the school, they will take a preliminary test. So, why conduct a bottom-up test? The reason is simply to understand the academic performance of the candidates. The teacher will judge whether each person's academic performance is excellent based on his score, and then further judge whether he is an excellent student. If your grades are not good, what will the teacher think of you? The teacher will only think you are a poor student. If your first impression is not good, it will be difficult for you to be taken seriously in your future study and life. As can be seen from the above example, academic performance is the main condition for determining whether a student is excellent. Therefore, academic performance is the main criterion for measuring a student.

So, fellow debaters, I think your academic performance should be among the best in the class. If your academic performance is not good, how can your teacher let you become debaters and participate in this debate competition? Even if it is because you are eloquent, people with good eloquence will not have poor Chinese scores, right?

Moreover, this is not only the case today with exam-oriented education, but also in ancient society. Everyone has studied history and should know that if the ancients wanted to be an official, they had to take the imperial examination. Only those who have passed the examination can become officials. This is what Confucius once said: "Excellence in learning leads to officialdom." The same was true for the Qing Dynasty, which was ruled by ethnic minorities, not to mention the Song Dynasty, which valued culture over military affairs. For positions above third grade, if you are not a Jinshi, don't even think about it. In the Ming Dynasty, it was established that those who were not elites selected from Jinshi - Shu (Jishi) could not enter the cabinet. The ancients liked to show off their status when meeting each other. If they were not qualified at all, they would be looked down upon. If this is really the case, then once a group of officials have nothing to do and hold a tea party to chat together, then you will have no choice but to run away.

In fact, there is now a civil service examination, the main content of which is to test the knowledge learned. Since a civil servant is measured by academic performance, let alone students who make learning their career. Which of the high school entrance examination and college entrance examination is not measured by learning? When we graduate from college, those outstanding students who are measured by academic performance can be directly admitted by the unit. The students who applied for the job were all fresh graduates and had little qualifications. The only thing that can be shown is academic performance. At that time, several applicants will stop in front of the person in charge of applying, and they will start talking about their resumes. When talking about the school of graduation, he graduated from Tsinghua University and I graduated from Peking University. What about you? You can't just make it up and say you graduated from ABC University abroad, right? There are also the results of CET-4 and CET-6. Although I won’t tell you whether you passed or not, only your score. But if you get a score of 30 or above, would you be embarrassed to show it to the person in charge of applying?

I don’t know if you have watched the news. The headline news in the education section in the past few months was about the cancellation of students with special talents in Jiangsu and other provinces. In the past, people believed that as long as a person had special talents, it would not matter if he had poor academic performance. But now people realize that if a student has poor academic performance, he is not an excellent student, and he will always be an ignorant person. Therefore, people chose to use academic performance as the main criterion to measure students - this is the most appropriate method derived from practice.

Not only that. People who excel academically tend to be better able to handle problems. Which famous official in ancient times did not score well in the imperial examination? As we all know, the imperial examinations in the Ming and Qing Dynasties mainly tested the eight-part essay. The eight-part essay is actually very restrictive. But even such a thing that imprisons the mind has also cultivated many capable ministers. For example, Shang Lu (lu) in the Ming Dynasty won three yuan in a row, and the eight-part essay was very well written. Facts have proved that his ability to handle government affairs is also very good. Not only civil servants, but also generals. Xin Qiji, the famous bold poet, not only wrote lyrics, but also fought on the battlefield and defeated the Jin army; Wang Yangming, who ranked first in the imperial examination, was not only good at writing eight-part essays, but also a combination of "literary, politician, military strategist, Philosopher" is an all-round talent. It can be seen that good academic performance is actually a sign of strong understanding ability. Therefore, people with good academic performance can also excel in other aspects.

In summary, academic performance is the main criterion for measuring a student.