The supervisor commands blindly and does it his way. Whose fault is it when something goes wrong?

Laugh and cry. It is relatively inappropriate for laymen to lead experts. A layman can control the ideological and political work of the unit and implement the party's principles and policies, but he must never pretend to know how to command an expert, so as to make a joke or even cause adverse consequences or heavy losses. Such leaders test people's emotional intelligence. Although we are often very helpless, we feel that everyone is not on the same channel and there is no other way, but we still have to pay attention to methods and be soft.

The phenomenon you mentioned actually exists in every unit, and they have absolute right to speak. When his remarks make you feel amateur, or you find it hard to accept that you are in command. In fact, in your heart, you are unconvinced, and it is difficult to accept the fact that the leader has broken his leg. If you don't understand management, don't command blindly. I once met a production manager who only talked about efficiency, not quality. He arranged for the production team leader to cut corners in this process. It was he who suffered later, and the client was not a fool. He returned the goods twice in succession. Later, the product didn't even have room for rework, so he had to re-produce and process it.

The sales department sings and shouts slogans every day, the barber shop dances and shouts passwords at the door every day, and the chefs and waiters in the restaurant run and shout slogans outside wearing dirty work clothes and holding flags every day! What is this mess? It looks like torture to idle eggs! I have always believed that there is no soldier who can't fight, only an armchair strategist. I believe that many people have encountered similar situations above, being directed by a person who knows nothing for a day and doing nothing for a month, wasting time. Some employees can't bear to leave directly, while others choose to put up with it.

One situation is that this leadership work is very difficult to do, and there is no way to lead the people below. Because he doesn't know the details and specific technology, he can't control the progress and quality, and he can't control what measures to take at which step. The people below will not take him seriously.