How to discover human nature?

I want to ask something funny to answer.

As an amateur school of philosophy and literature, bohemian is generally interpreted as following the most natural nature to ensure people's own subjective will, and any subjective will endowed by the environment or independently produced is actually meaningless to this theme. It is actually an arrogant fantasy for human beings to sue for a role they want, and the concept of human nature itself is only a summary of human roles and behavioral norms in the existing environmental ecology, which is summarized as a judgment under the existing norms. The most natural process is cruel pleasure.

So in dissolute texts, it is customary to express such a motif. Female two are often political celebrities who are familiar with the role in the social field. They come from local aristocrats and are read by countless people. Vanity is their first duty, and conquest is their lifelong pursuit. Men are often fools under the mask of precise roles and are used to cold passion.

The man is often overconfident. He thinks he knows women, and even thinks that others, like machines, can make an open analysis from the beginning of their behavior. Moreover, he thinks that he can play the right role in various contexts and pull the other person into his own narrative.

The hostess is often a descendant who conforms to all the morality and puritanism of the Cape Dynasty, is obsessed with marriage happiness and primitive love, and enjoys tolerance and running-in in common life.

But the funny thing is that these three completely different people have such a similar ending. In the power relationship of role politics, male leaders are often completely divorced from the rhythm they can control by the stricter role structure, so that they die in the gap of power network, like a cold joke; The hostess thinks that she can control everything in her small life and run her own industry and family, but she is often lost in the network of power. Of course, her motivation is some subtle lust and despair at the bottom of a happy life. The second girl tried to deconstruct the role relationship, and summarized it into some precise features, and compiled it into a controllable love mechanism, but she could not deconstruct her role shackles, and the mechanism she created was full of loopholes, so that she was exhausted in a patriarchal society and eventually crushed by her role.

Therefore, the cognitive and empirical induction that we try to establish and make an essential judgment on any object is essentially limited to this role structure. Instead of discussing the essence, you are just discussing the relationship between the role and the role you are used to. People's role-playing is far more than subjective self-disguise or deception.

This is the gender politics realized from Sade to Laclau, trying to deconstruct this social relationship and point out its damage to human freedom, trying to return to the most primitive lust, so as to establish free role-playing through private contracts to express weak and self-evident negative resistance. This emotion influenced19th century and Baudelaire. This way of thinking is similar to gofman's parody theory, that is, self-performance under established symbols is like putting people in a transparent dome theater, performing and staring.

So the so-called essence is nothing more than the role of a theater in a certain context and its habit of coping with its social barrier.