Reading Experience of Yu Zi's Debate

When we have a deep understanding of something, we can record it by writing down our own experiences, which can improve our written expression ability. So what should I write about my experience? Presumably this makes everyone very upset. The following is my reading experience of the debate in Yu Zi for your reference and hope to help you.

Although the article 1 is very short, after reading it, I dare not pick up my mobile phone and cut to Jiugongge in one go! Why? I'm not afraid of your jokes. I don't know how to write.

On the surface, what this article tells us is military theory. First, in a war, we should seize the fighter plane and strike first. In this battle of Song and Chu for hegemony over the Central Plains, Chu was strong and Song was weak, and God gave Song Xianggong an excellent "harmony between the right place and the right time". When Chu Jun was not in Gigi and Song Xianggong was still carsick, his half-brother Song Gongzi's half-brother Gong Sungu remonstrated in time, but Song Xianggong's "listening" made the right place at the right time and lost it in vain, which eventually led to ". So this tells us that the consequences of delaying the fighter plane are very serious (now or never)! Second, the main goal of the war must be to annihilate the enemy's effective forces and fight a war of annihilation. Song Xianggong's so-called "a gentleman doesn't get seriously injured, but he doesn't catch two hairs", but Fu strongly retorted, "Teach war with shame and murder the enemy. ".How can you not be heavy before you die? If you love being seriously injured, don't hurt yourself! Love twenty cents is like serving food! "In a word," you don't understand war! In the modern history of China, at the beginning of the war of liberation, the situation was also extremely unfavorable to the PLA. Mao Zedong put forward that all reactionaries are paper tigers, they despise the enemy strategically, attach importance to the enemy tactically, annihilate the enemy's effective forces in the movement, focus on annihilating the enemy's effective forces, and aim at fighting a annihilation war, thus turning disadvantages into advantages! Third, the momentum of war can effectively promote the whole situation. "It's okay to drum if you resist." "It's okay to drum if you are loud and ambitious." Similarly, the famous Cao Gui debate also talked about "assembly"!

In essence, this article also embodies a distinction between benevolence and universal love! We know that Confucius' kindness is different love. How can parents and children who love others be as selfless as their parents and children? Mozi's universal love is indiscriminate love, which embodies the hope of small producers in the Warring States period and the pursuit of peace without war in all countries! In fact, benevolence and righteousness in war should be to safeguard justice for the people, love the people, love their soldiers, protect their interests, and launch all possible offensives in politics, diplomacy, military and other aspects. , and maximize the attack and isolation of the enemy, reduce their own losses. Of course, giving preferential treatment to prisoners is humanitarian under complete control of the situation, which is another matter! Song Xianggong's mistake lies in confusing right and wrong, reversing black and white, and confusing the enemy and ourselves. Talking about benevolence and righteousness with the enemy is nothing more than drawing water with a sieve in the end. wishful thinking can't change the bad luck of "Songshi's defeat"! It can be said that when the National Building is about to collapse, Song Xianggong has not smelled the horror of death!

Reading experience of Yu Zi Debate 2. I read China's View of Ancient Literature in winter vacation and was greatly surprised by its contents. This book was edited and commented by two uncles, Wu Chulin and Wu Diaohou, during the reign of Kangxi in the early Qing Dynasty. It spreads in urban and rural areas, appealing to both refined and popular tastes, and has a very wide influence. It has left a historical track of thousands of years from a certain side, recorded the history of China from a unique perspective, and became a witness of history. In the meantime, several articles made me remember deeply and shine brilliantly. In particular, the debate about giant salamander highlights the infinite wisdom and significance of human beings.

The Debate on Jade Son is the work of Zuo Qiuming in the pre-Qin period, which records the beginning and end of the Song-Chu War and shows the fierce conflict between two opposing military thoughts. The situation at that time was that Chu was strong and Song weak. In order to weaken Chu, Song Xianggong sent troops to attack Zheng, and Chu sent troops to save Zheng, so the war broke out. At the beginning of the war, Song Xianggong clung to the pedantic dogma that a gentleman should not take advantage of the danger of others, and refused to accept the correct opinion that Yu Zi would attack immediately, thus delaying the fighter plane and being killed by the State of Song. Yu Zi's understanding of the times is in sharp contrast with Song Xianggong's conservative thought, which further highlights Yu Zi's wisdom. In the second half, Yu Zi refuted Song Xianggong's pedantic argument, which was roughly "You don't know how to type", then refuted "Don't overflow" and then refuted "Don't waste twenty cents". Finally, he came to the conclusion that when the enemy encounters obstacles, we must attack and enhance the morale of the soldiers, so that we can win.

Song Xianggong was blocked by Chen Nian's family, stubborn and stupid. If you want to be kind, why be enemies with others? Since we are enemies, why talk about kindness? Song Xianggong may not have clearly distinguished between the two events, but he just insisted on his honor out of kindness. Yu Zi can jump out from here, successfully separate the good from the enemy, put forward the viewpoint of not being kind to the enemy with groundbreaking thinking, and successfully broke through the conventional thinking. Unfortunately, what Yu Zi said was to the point, but he didn't understand Song Xianggong's sadness. What a pity!

Everyone will have different views on the same thing, but there will always be some creative and innovative ideas in it. Perhaps this innovative thinking is the best way to solve this problem, and what we lack most in the new era is undoubtedly this innovative idea. An innovative idea can help us succeed. It also indicates the objective truth that new things will definitely replace old things. No matter for individuals or corporate countries, if they lack the spirit of innovation, they will only stagnate, but may go backwards. Only by adhering to the spirit of innovation and bravely practicing the individual enterprise country can we develop.

There is no doubt that the reason for Song Xianggong's failure is stubbornness. He insisted on his own ideas, went his own way on the wrong road, and finally betrayed him, and the result was reasonable. Imagine: If Song Xianggong listened to Yu Zi's advice and attacked the Chu army before it was ready, history might be rewritten. As the king of a country, Song Xianggong should be open and honest, actively consult ministers, consult modestly and brainstorm. And when we encounter difficulties, we should also humbly ask others and listen to their suggestions, so as to find our own problems and improve ourselves.

We should actively explore our own innovative ability and listen to other people's suggestions with an open mind. This is the experience that we should learn from the debate about fish.

Reading Experience of Yu Zi Debate 3 When I opened the Yu Zi Debate, I was simply immersed in Mr. Jin's hearty comments: Although the pen is fast, it is almost like scissors. The more you cut it, the more disgusting it is. There are countless choking diseases in the chest. After reading this article, I will be relieved for the time being. For Song Xianggong, it changed the original view.

Reading Debate on the Fish at this time is like watching A Chinese Odyssey. Song Xianggong's benevolence, righteousness and morality are as wordy as the Tang Priest in Rory's works, and he plays a clown and plays a cold joke on the screen. We can choose to appreciate it or not, but how to comment?

In today's words, Song Xianggong is more like a stare blankly. He wants to be the overlord in the Spring and Autumn Period. He was angry with Zheng for supporting Chu. Later, he attacked Zheng and turned against Chu. He just wants to compete fairly and doesn't want to win by conspiracy. In his eyes, winning means winning impressively, and losing means losing vigorously. This is a very gentleman's game. Unfortunately, he forgot that he represented a country, not an individual. He forgot that behind his fall, there were countless people who suffered with him. Perhaps, it is only because of the suffering of these people that he is accused. However, if this battle is played by two people, he is a hero. Not stupid.

Song Xianggong stands for tradition. "If we can put ourselves in the position of a Chu soldier, an opponent, the old, the weak, the sick, and the common people, we will know what Song Xianggong insists on." This is the opinion of a netizen at Tianya. I agree that if you put yourself in the position of your opponent, you will understand. A friend asked me what is the definition of a hero? I think a hero is just one person's definition, and no one can convince anyone else's definition. In my opinion, if Gong meets an injured person, even if they are destiny takes a hand's opponents, I believe Gong Yu will never take advantage of others' danger. If so, this is the hero I understand.

"The ancient army also, irresistible pass also. Although I have died, I can't do it without drums. " Since Song Xianggong talked about turning the past into an army, there must have been such a practice before his time, but many people gave it up and he persisted. This is the result of the war.

Perhaps, many things care about the angle we look at and the starting point of our vision. Mao Zedong said that Song Xianggong was a stupid pig, which is from a historical perspective. I think Song Xianggong is a person who plays jokes, which is from a literary point of view. Song Xianggong in literature and the real Song Xianggong are two different things. History needs comment, because that will make people feel a sense of responsibility and history, so every historical figure will have a right and wrong judgment. From a literary point of view, Song Xianggong can be a lovely person. Depends on which angle you look at it.

I can only say that Song Xianggong is a person who insists on tradition. In the society where he lives, he attaches great importance to etiquette. He thinks that if he abides by etiquette, others will compete with him aboveboard. He lived in the ideal of that era …

This is just my understanding of a man a thousand years ago, but that era is too far away for any of us to understand accurately. All I can do is hope that when everyone lambastes Song Xianggong, we can understand him from another angle.

Reading "Argument on Jade Son 4" and realizing that the Chu army attacked the Song Dynasty to save Zheng. When preparing for the battle, Fu Cha Gongsungu dissuaded him and said, "God has abandoned the Shang Dynasty for a long time, and it is unforgivable for the King to revive the Shang Dynasty." Xianggong didn't listen. Xiang Gong led his troops to fight the Chu army in the flood. Song Jun has lined up, but Chu Jun hasn't completely crossed the river. Sima Gongsun Gu said, "There are many of them, but there are few of us. Please order to attack them before they all cross the river. " To be fair: "No" Chu troops all crossed the river, but the queue was not well arranged. Gongsungu reported the above opinions to Xianggong. "xianggong" said, "not yet." Wait for Chu Jun to soothe, and then attack them. As a result, Song Jun was defeated. Song Xianggong was injured in the leg and all the guards were wiped out.

The whole country is guilty of helping the public. Xiang Gong said, "A gentleman doesn't hurt people who have been hurt, and he doesn't catch people with white hair. In ancient times, leading troops to fight was not to stop the enemy by narrow terrain. Although I am a descendant of Yin Shang who perished in the country, I will not attack the troops that have not lined up. " Yu Zi said, "The king doesn't know how to fight. Strong enemies can't line up in dangerous places, which is sponsored by God. Isn't it possible to stop the enemy from attacking them in dangerous places? That's it. I'm afraid I can't win And now we face the strong, is our enemy. Even when you are very old, if you catch it, take it away. Why bother with white hair? Let the army understand the national humiliation and teach them to fight to kill the enemy. If the injury doesn't kill you, how can we stop hurting them? If you don't want to hurt the injured enemy again, don't hurt them at all; If you pity the white-haired among them, you should surrender to the enemy. Use it when the army is favorable, and the bells and drums use tone morale. It is possible to use troops to stop the enemy in dangerous places when the time is favorable. Drums are loud, to inspire the rustic, but also to attack the enemies who are not in harmony. "

The Debate on Jade Son is an article about the beginning and end of the dispute between Song and Chu, which shows the fierce conflict between two opposing military thoughts in the form of dialogue.

The first half of the article describes the course of the war and the end of Song Xianggong's fiasco, while the second half refutes Song Xianggong's pedantic argument.

In 638 BC, Song and Chu fought for the hegemony of the Central Plains, and a war broke out in the flood.

At that time, Zheng was close to Chu and sent troops to attack Zheng in order to weaken Chu.

When Chu sent troops to attack Song Dynasty to save Zheng, the war broke out.

The situation at that time was that Chu was strong and Song weak.

At the beginning of the war, the situation was favorable to Song Jun, but Song Xianggong stuck to the pedantic dogma of "not taking advantage of others' danger" and refused to accept Yu Zi's correct opinion, thus delaying the fighter plane and failing miserably.

Yu Zi's viewpoint is in sharp contrast with Song Xianggong's pedantry.

Yu Zi, Song Xianggong's half brother, Mu Yi.

He advocated seizing fighter planes, taking them by surprise, pre-empting them and completely destroying the effective forces of the enemy. Only by smashing zongzi and offering sacrifices can we win the war.