The director of a kindergarten in Xi'an said: "We will not accept rural children, and we will only raise swans, not pigs." What do you think?

These words said by the principal of Xi'an Kindergarten and her differential treatment of students happen all the time in real society, and she is no longer an exception. However, under the call of national policies, many schools do not dare to do so blatantly, and even form an invisible "hidden rule" with various conditions for enrollment.

Due to the rapid development trend of urbanization in the country, large-scale population mobility has been promoted. "Difficulty in going to school" has become a common problem in many cities. Local students have to rely on the school district or household registration, and even a lottery is required to determine whether they can enroll. Especially for the children of migrant workers, it is even more difficult to go to school. Therefore, this layer of discrimination has formed in society.

People with superior family conditions want their children to enjoy a better education, and even spend a lot of money to send their children to aristocratic schools. They think that they can get in touch with people in the "upper class" and expand their contacts and social circles. If schools lower the threshold and accept students with insufficient qualifications, they will look at such students with a discriminatory eye.

People with average family conditions also want to rely on their children's schools to show off themselves and show off their status. Many of them are from peasant backgrounds, but they use school grades to delineate their classes. When talking to such parents, it is obvious that they have a strong sense of superiority.

Under the influence of this potential class consciousness, even if children from rural families are qualified to enter the so-called "noble schools", they will be looked down upon by some people with colored glasses. Just like this teacher from Xi'an, who compared rural children to pigs. In their eyes, education is "classy", and they think that children in cities are like swans, with noble birth. No matter how hard a child from rural areas works, he is always just a "country bumpkin".

Therefore, as a teacher, she does not have the professionalism of a qualified teacher, fails to teach without distinction, and fails to respect and treat students equally. She is just a realistic "social person" and a businesswoman who puts profits first. In her position as a teacher, if she makes these extreme remarks, she will certainly become the target of public criticism.

“Only raise swans but not pigs”! As an enlightenment teacher, I make this statement! The teacher's ethics are extremely bad! It’s a “swan” and you don’t need to raise it. It’s your duty to raise a “pig” into a “swan”!

The ancient "Three Character Classic" says: "At the beginning of human beings, their nature is good. Their natures are similar, but their habits are far apart.

"It means that people have basically the same mentality when they are born. Due to the influence of acquired environment, education, etc., human nature has undergone tremendous changes! This is also the reason why parents have wanted their children to receive a good education for thousands of years! Do not learn , Being uneducated is not the mainstream of the Chinese people!

In the eyes of a good teacher, there is no difference between "pig" children and "swan" children! Rather than saying that the child is a "pig" or a "swan", you should subconsciously think that the parent is a "pig" or a "swan"! Because of your perception, the child's parents are divided into three levels! < /p>

The quality of a person is the result of teaching! Children are "pig" and "swan". They are similar in sex. The quality of people grows up because they are far away from each other! It falls on the shoulders of your teachers!

It is a false proposition to only teach "swan" children and not "pig" children! They are already "swans", so why should you teach them "pig" children? That’s why you teach! And it’s your job to teach “pig” to “swan”!

This principal teacher makes such remarks, which shows that she is not a qualified teacher! And it’s a leader! This can only show that this principal teacher’s educational qualifications have serious problems! The whole mess in the education industry can be seen in the video! The kindergarten teacher made an astonishing statement: "Our teacher is a leader in early childhood education. I learned the technique of raising swans from him. I don't know how to raise pigs. We can run a non-profit, but I can't run a non-profit that is inclusive. The street office is looking for me." Let’s talk, kindergartens need to be diverted. How many children will you accept? What I said at the time was, none. I didn’t mean to look down on the rural areas. For example, those children who work, sell vegetables, and sell fish, I can’t do that. , I really can’t communicate. If I lower it to 1200, there will be a large number of such children coming in, because the threshold is lowered, and then you will find that there is a mixed bag of vegetables and fish sellers around your children, and then Let’s start learning together...”

Watching this video, Teacher Xiao Xu was wondering how an educator could say such words so confidently and sonorously?

Click here According to the thinking of a principal, her kindergarten cannot cut prices and become an inclusive non-profit kindergarten, because then a large number of children from the working class will flood in, and the kindergarten will become a "pig factory."

According to her logic of thinking, the children of the rich and those who can afford the high tuition fees for kindergarten are "swans", while the children of the working people at the bottom are "pigs". To put it this way, we should The children of teachers are even less worthy of being "swans", because our wages are lower than those of vegetable and fish sellers. Their monthly income from selling fried dough sticks can reach 30,000, and the same can be said for vegetable and fish sellers. It reaches 10,000 to 20,000, and our monthly income as a teacher can only be 3,000 to 4,000, but let us admit that our children are "pig", we really can't accept it

The ancients said: "The beginning of man." , nature is good, nature is similar, habits are far apart. If you don't teach, your nature will change. The way to teach is to be specialized. "The reason why people are willing to pay high prices to send their children to better kindergartens is precisely because they want their children to receive a better education, instead of sending them to be discriminated against and labeled. At the beginning of education, education should be about truth, kindness, and kindness. Education for beauty, not utilitarian and snobbish education.

As a teacher, Mr. Xu has children from rich families as well as children from poor families. We do not feel that the children from poor families are inherently different. They are inferior and have bad nature. On the contrary, some children from poor families study harder, know how to be tolerant to others, and know how to consider others. These qualities are often not bought by money.

I don’t know why the principal uses career and family material conditions to evaluate the nature of a child. Maybe in her eyes, as long as he has money, everything about him is good. There’s only money in it, right?

Teacher Xiao Xu doesn’t know what kind of parents dare to send their children to such a kindergarten. Who can guarantee that their children will not be compared in such a kindergarten? Who can guarantee that their children will be Is the director raising a pure "swan"?

In such an environment, how many parents are scrambling to prove that their children are the pure "swans". How will the children be nurtured in such an environment? Will I be discriminated against because I enroll in one less class or participate in one less activity?

As a teacher and a child’s enlightener, how can you bear to convey the vulgar snobbery of society to your children?

Although there are some people in society who are mercenary and snobbish, and regard money as the only criterion for evaluating people, educators cannot do it. If educators become snobbish and look at different families with colored glasses, students, if the students’ three views are correct, where will our society go?

The future education must have people with great feelings, high cultivation, and broad minds to lead students from different walks of life to discover their infinite possibilities and absorb the fragrance brought by knowledge, and knowledge Regardless of high or low, everyone can gain its true meaning. What do you think?

Thanks Wukong for the invitation! I have been working in early childhood education for many years and have come into contact with all kinds of parents. Only swans are raised, not pigs. This is the first time I have heard this saying. The kindergarten I am in is a public kindergarten and recruits all children. There is no need to have indicators or find connections. It is not difficult to enter the park and many people want to squeeze in. But in order to control the number of people, we will no longer recruit people once they are full.

Beside our kindergarten are some ordinary residents. There are vegetable sellers, beef sellers, and sunshine milk sellers. There are people in all walks of life, but there are no high-ranking officials. There are also many mothers who are unemployed and just take care of their children at home, and their educational level is not high. Only a few parents are educated intellectuals and know a lot about education. If we follow the principal's words, then among the children we recruit, the vast majority are "pigs", and only a few are one or two swans! Isn't it sad?

Are we all learning pig-raising techniques? No!

Let me first tell you about my skills. I learned the skills of raising swans. I am an American positive discipline parent and school lecturer, as well as a national senior family education instructor and lecturer. I have many other identities that I won’t go into detail here. I am deeply rooted in the field of education. I have given educational lectures to parents in kindergartens for many years, and they are all very grateful to me! The children of these parents are called "little pigs" by others. You can think about it, am I using the same techniques as raising swans to raise "little pigs"? I am not exhausted, and I can still communicate with parents.

Confucius once said that education should teach students in accordance with their aptitude. Teaching without distinction refers to the universality of education, while teaching students in accordance with their aptitude refers to the uniqueness of education. Education without distinction means that anyone can receive education. Teaching students in accordance with their aptitude means that teachers choose learning methods that suit the characteristics of each student.

In other words, whether they are swans or "little pigs", they all have the right to education. As an educator, you should be more caring and spread your love to every child instead of discriminating against them. When we feel that it is difficult to communicate with the other party, we can try to change our roles and language communication methods. Don't put yourself in a lofty position and be domineering, but communicate with parents on an equal footing. It will be difficult at work, but we have to accept these children.

In our kindergarten, there are still many such family situations. When parents divorce or work outside the home, the children are taken care of by their grandparents and become left-behind children. Because in the families of these children, the parenting style is negligent and laissez-faire, resulting in them having no sense of rules at all. Teachers also find it very difficult when educating these children.

In our courtyard, there is a child like this who is taken care of by his grandmother all year round. Whenever something happens to the child, we have to communicate with the old man.

Sometimes I still wear a pair of big shoes to go to kindergarten, which makes it difficult to walk. Children often come to kindergarten at half past ten without even attending classes. When we communicated with her, she didn't respond at all.

There are so many parents like this in our courtyard. Whenever teachers report these situations to leaders, leaders are helpless. She said, we have to accept them, otherwise if they leave the kindergarten, where else will they be accepted? These children will only be more pitiful! Besides, we have no reason to drive these children away. They all have the right to receive education. I thought about it carefully and found that what the leader said did make sense. Therefore, sometimes when we are working, although there will be times when we complain, in the end the teachers will still treat every child equally!

We cannot just raise swans without raising "pigs". Otherwise, there will be more and more "little pigs" in the future, which is not conducive to the development of the family and the entire society. This is a distorted concept. For the entire society to develop harmoniously, it must be balanced. The same goes for education. I believe that with the nourishment and tolerance of the teacher's love, these "Pigs" will slowly turn into beautiful and lovely swans.

This year, the Ministry of Education issued regulations that in order to improve the operation of kindergartens, community kindergartens should gradually become inclusive and non-profit kindergartens. This is also the aspiration of the people and the trend of the times. However, recently the principal of a kindergarten in a community in Xi'an spoke nonsense, telling the Education Bureau and the village director why she did not want to open an inclusive kindergarten: "We are learning to raise swans. Technology, we don’t know how to raise pigs.”

In the opinion of the principal, their kindergarten has invested a lot of money and is aimed at the elite, what she calls “swans”. Once it is completed, If there is an inclusive kindergarten, the children in the village, the children of the fish sellers, and the low-quality children of the vegetable sellers, which she considers the "pig", will sneak in and affect the "swans" in the garden, so She is unwilling to make the kindergarten universal.

Are there classes in society? Are people high or low? The textbooks tell us that we don’t have it, but in fact, most people still have it in their hearts. It's just that the standards of "swan" and "pig" are different. Some people measure money, some people measure status, and some people measure quality and cultivation.

The reason why the director's words aroused public outrage is because he stated his own standards. The rich are "swans" and the poor are "pig".

Because this kindergarten is private, she can actually decide whether to run it as a universal kindergarten, and she will not be forced to do it. You can find other reasons to shirk it and postpone it for a while.

But whether this director lacks experience or is confident, he goes straight to the point. His one sentence has offended a large number of people. How can he not arouse public outrage? This is completely because IQ needs to be recharged!

The adult world has levels. The income of a celebrity from just one play is worth the lifetime labor of an ordinary person. Some officials are greeted by everyone and enjoy unlimited glory when they go out, while many ordinary people can only He is alone and only goes out to work. These are all intentional or unintentional class divisions.

But I think it is best not to divide children into different classes. Otherwise, the poor will receive a relatively backward education, and the rich will be one step ahead from kindergarten and enjoy elite education. Then the classes may be solidified, and the rich and the poor will be The gap will grow wider.

When I saw this sentence, I remembered that in many big cities such as Beijing and Shanghai, we often hear similar words, which is to tell outsiders to go away and think about the locals.

I often feel dumbfounded by this kind of regional discrimination and household registration discrimination.

Because basically everyone has a very difficult life. They all face unattainable housing prices and the same smog pollution. How can they still have a sense of superiority?

Speaking of rural children, I think that if the regional economic development is about the same and the teaching resources are about the same, no one would want to bother with the bullshit school district housing and have to go to some high-end kindergarten, right?

In Japan, students go to school nearby, and children go to and from school by themselves. If there is a choice, I think every parent would like this for their children.

Many people say that the director is just bringing the unspoken rules to the table, which is not wrong, but isn’t this really a scary place? Why are our children so young? The first thing they learn is discrimination, and the first thing they face is favoritism

I remember that I was in primary school, and I already knew that I must give gifts to teachers, and I knew that teachers not only like grades Okay, I prefer those with rich families.

From elementary school to high school, the rich kids were always the godsons and daughters of their teachers. Some of them were like my mother’s company CEO with hundreds of millions of assets. Although their grades were poor, they were directly in the national key high schools. The principal's goddaughter.

When I was in junior high school, the monitor of the class next door was the child of a government official. Although this child had poor grades and caused trouble everywhere.

You see, no matter how much fairness is told to you on campus and in textbooks, and no distinction is made between high and low in the industry, life ironically teaches your children other facts.

So, where is the root cause?

That is, expressing respect is not an expression in books. This kind of practical respect needs to be implemented in real life.

I sincerely hope that if there are people who have similar discrimination, think about it. If they have a choice, none of them would want to leave their hometown, and no one would not want to give their children a noble life. Many of them are not even lazy. They get up early every day and work late. , but this is the reality.

Speaking of this, some people may say, who makes them lazy, who makes them do this kind of profession, who makes them not study and do good work?

Let’s talk about laziness first. They deliver food, work in restaurants, shop, factory workers, and construction sites. Do you dare to call them lazy? They must be very tired.

At this time, some people said that if they didn’t study hard, what could they do?

But think about it, are they all born in families that can provide them with education? Do they have parents who love them very much, who have no worries about food and drink, and provide them with a good study environment?

The reality of this society is that in the past, compulsory education was not so popular, and everyone was generally poor. Many people may even be daughters, but they were born in a family that favored boys over girls and did not go to school, or they met unfavorable children. Even good parents are abused.

So, how can you ignore everything and easily criticize others just because you were born well?

When it comes to discrimination, shouldn’t it be those who are discriminating against those who break the law and commit crimes? Shouldn't it be the people who are being discriminated against?

As long as a person works hard, is diligent, and does not harm others, he should be respected.

However, there are too many people like this director. , looking at money unilaterally, no matter how the household registration came from, no matter how the other party earned the money, as long as he has money, he must be a swan?

For people like this, I hope that one day when you face other injustices, being exploited, or being discriminated against, you can also say frankly, who made me poor? I should kneel down.

"We are learning the technique of raising swans. We will not raise pigs. The village director of Ducheng Village asked me to send all the children in the village here. I don't agree because of these The quality of the children is too low." When parents asked why inclusive fees were not fully implemented, "Principal Cui", the person in charge of China Railway Shangducheng Child Care Center, responded.

In this matter, I thought of two questions:

1. Why does this overbearing principal make these remarks:

Why does this principal not implement it? The principal explained that the inclusive fee is because this kindergarten follows the elite education route and implements swan education. If universal benefits are implemented, all children will come, and those children with low quality (vegetable sellers, fish sellers) will come. What was originally a kindergarten for raising swans will become an education for raising pigs. If you put it this way, wouldn't it be very simple, just give them food and drink. Especially for those so-called swan children, you are swans, and the education I give you is also a swan. Are you willing to let those pigs come in and be with you? This seems to make some sense from a parent's perspective. It elevates the children in the city, but belittles the children in the urban villages. But the children in these urban villages don't care whether you raise swans or pigs. They care about fees. Therefore, the principal's metaphor is completely inappropriate. It should be explained based on the main demands of these parents, instead of using such metaphors to belittle the children.

2. Our education can raise swans as well as pigs

Why does the director say that the quality of the children in the village is too low, and that those who sell vegetables and fish are of such low quality? Children are inferior to others, right? Where does the low quality lie? Is it behavioral habits or family background? If it is a behavioral habit, it does not mean that the quality is low? Have you not seen BMW drivers throwing milk cartons and cigarette butts on the roadside? If it comes from family background, there are hundreds of millions of farmers in our country, but they actually contribute to this country with their simple labor. Their quality is not low at all, and they are even noble. Aren’t they the ones who piled up the bricks and tiles in the city? Aren’t they the ones who clean up the city’s garbage? The vegetable sellers and fish sellers are of low quality and cannot communicate with them. How do you communicate with them when you buy vegetables or fish? Don't you buy these? Without these vegetable and fish sellers, you high-quality people would not have much protection in your life.

If it is a dialect problem, you deny the quality of these people and feel that they cannot communicate. Doesn’t this go against the increased efforts to protect dialects across the country? Wouldn’t it be great to let children love the language and culture of their hometown?

At present, the principal’s remarks have aroused dissatisfaction among parents and caused serious negative impacts. The company has released the company, which can be regarded as a comprehensive explanation.

I really want to ask the kindergarten principal: Is your child a swan or a pig?

Are you raising your children using the techniques of raising swans or the techniques of raising pigs?

If your child is a swan, why do you say other people's children are pigs!

Were you a swan or a pig when you were a child?

In my opinion, you have no elegance or nobility like a swan. When you say such words, it goes without saying that you have classified yourself as a "domestic animal"! !

It is hard to believe that the principal of a kindergarten can be so domineering, speaking sonorously, powerfully, and speaking without shame. Who gave you such confidence and courage?

It doesn’t matter the level of the kindergarten teacher, you are just naive. You really treat yourself like a dish!

When we all condemned this principal, we couldn’t help but ask, who gave this kindergarten principal such confidence?

1. The relative shortage of early childhood education institutions has led to a shortage of places. Early childhood education is not compulsory education and does not have separate admissions. It is a fee-based education and follows the laws of the market. When supply exceeds demand, sellers take the opportunity to raise prices and become aggressive. This is inevitable. When supply exceeds demand, look at it, I guarantee you a smile on your face, and I can’t wait to beg you to send your child over. Now, with the liberalization of the two-child policy, there has been a large increase in the number of children. There is a relative shortage of early childhood education institutions and a shortage of places.

Two days ago, I experienced first-hand how nervous it is to get a place for children to enter kindergarten. A well-known local kindergarten said in advance that there would be no problem for children to enter the kindergarten, but I still wanted to grab one through normal channels. degree, this will also avoid the trouble of asking for help. Online registration starts at 9:00 on the 20th and will be until capacity is filled. I arranged the class with my partner in advance, and found a few colleagues to guard the computer together. I wanted to use multiple computers to attack at the same time. As long as one of them can grab it, it would be considered a success. We were facing a formidable enemy. We started at 9 o'clock and immediately started filling out the form and submitting it. To be honest, it only took 2 minutes. You heard me right. It only took 2 minutes from opening the webpage to submitting. When I finished submitting , it has been shown that the registration quota is full and registration is stopped! My colleague's typing speed is very fast. He can type three to four thousand words in an hour without any problem, but he still didn't report it. It is said that the applications were all done in Internet cafes, and several people were found to sign up at the same time. The detailed information of the children had been typed out in advance, and they only needed to be copied and pasted. Despite careful preparation in advance, they still fell short.

It is said that the same situation occurred when registering for several other well-known kindergartens. When registering online, the degree was lost in seconds.

The reason why this situation occurs is because there are relatively few truly high-quality kindergartens and the number of children is increasing rapidly.

The reason why the principal of that kindergarten is so domineering is that, in the final analysis, this kindergarten has no shortage of students.

2. The kindergarten management is disorderly and lacks necessary constraints.

Kindergartens are not compulsory education. They have the right to enroll students and screen students. This is understandable. However, it must comply with certain ethical standards, the words and deeds of practitioners must be in line with educational principles, and the fees must be reasonable and cannot be overpriced to show the high-end nature of their kindergarten. Nowadays, many kindergartens think they have a rare product to live in, and their practitioners speak out loudly, which makes people angry and disgusting. The words and deeds of this kindergarten principal are definitely not individual actions. We have a government kindergarten here. It is clearly stipulated that children whose parents are both civil servants can enter the kindergarten. Children of single-employee workers and other families are not allowed to enter. Even children who live in the community at their door cannot enter. And those who enter the kindergarten As a child, his parents were both in government agencies, so they had developed connections with each other. Neighboring residents also sounded angry. I didn’t expect there to be such a weird rule. But there was nothing we could do.

What is even more troublesome for parents is that kindergarten fees have skyrocketed. They used to be more than a thousand a month, but now some kindergartens have risen to several thousand. Many kindergartens I know have raised fees, and they all flaunt their own Kindergartens are aimed at children from high-end families, allowing young children to enjoy high-end education. I know that a nearby kindergarten costs 6,000 yuan per month.

This kind of weird regulations in kindergartens, the frequent outrageous language of early childhood education practitioners, and the arbitrary increase in prices reflect that the entry threshold for kindergartens is too low, the quality of practitioners is uneven, and the management is ineffective. sequence status.

Although the director, who specializes in raising swans, made rude remarks, we have not heard what kind of industry regulations she is subject to, nor what price she has to pay for her inappropriate remarks. This shows that our management of kindergartens needs to be strengthened urgently!

This director of the park is really "unstoppable even if he doesn't say anything shocking". Can a person who is a pig farmer raise a swan? Really doubtful.

Going back from this sentence, the director’s ancestors were born and raised in rural areas no more than three generations ago. A person who has just left the countryside will turn around and despise his compatriots. Such a person who has "forgotten his roots" is first of all morally disgusting. Can a person with problems as a person engage in early childhood education?

The prosperity, beauty, and strength of a city are inseparable from thousands of migrant workers. When they finally found a place in the city and wanted their children to change their destiny through reading, so I sent my children to study in the city, but they heard such vulgar and superficial words, and I felt so desolate in my heart!

Democracy, equality, and fairness have been included in the core values ??of our society. This sentence also reveals that the principal's "three views" are not correct. How can such a person be qualified to provide children's enlightenment education? What kind of educational philosophy will a kindergarten under the leadership of such a principal have: Will it instill his unequal educational philosophy into students?

It’s really scary. This is typical “pig farmer” thinking!