Miscellaneous talk It is difficult to produce a noble son from a poor family

Before you develop your own argument, there are three key words that need to be queried and the concepts unified. Otherwise, the topic will be exploited and extraneous issues will only become a stinky woman's foot wrap - smelly and long.

"Hanmen" is explained in the dictionary as follows: it generally refers to a poor and humble family.

The word "difficult" has several meanings: 1. It is not easy and takes time to do. 2. Impossible to achieve, making people feel difficult. 3. Not good.

"Noble son" refers to the heir who will become a prominent person in the future. Often used as a greeting.

Poverty is generally easy to understand and can be understood as a description of the difficulties of life. Humble means low status and humble origins.

Just taking it literally, the title of the article can be turned into a continuous description: it is not easy, impossible and difficult for a poor and humble family to produce heirs who will become prominent in the future.

I believe that many people do not have much objection to this statement. After all, raising a noble son is not an easy matter.

However, when this sentence comes out of the mouths of many people, it completely changes its flavor. In their tone, there are some who are self-defeating, some who are sarcastic, some who cling to their vested interests and cling to one-third of an acre of land while kicking their way up, and some who are whimsical, trying to get something for nothing, and crying after being slapped in the face by reality. There are...the list goes on and on.

Is this a disastrous era for poor families? My answer is of course no. Of course, this denial is based on affirmative efforts. If you give up on yourself, you will be a golden gate and a silver gate. In the end, you will be a dog in the mourning gate. Otherwise, the string of successful counterattack cases around us will never be accidental.

Anyone with a little bit of historical knowledge knows that in ancient Chinese history, hereditary inheritance is a common social operation model. Hereditary disciples are given titles and are called so-and-so's family. Isn't it strange for everyone? Even a family title awarded by an emperor can be passed down from generation to generation and used by descendants. According to historical records, during the prosperous Tang Dynasty, about 80% of official positions were passed down to future generations in a hereditary manner. You may not feel the inheritance of ordinary official positions, but the inheritance of the emperor's position and country should be familiar to everyone. Therefore, in history, only about 10 or so children from poor families had the possibility to jump over the dragon gate, while people in the 90s could only be imprisoned on the land for generations, living a life with the loess and the sky behind. The country only selects one number one scholar a year, which is a rarity. For a poor family, it is more difficult to have a noble son than to ascend to heaven. There is also the absurd but real tragedy that Fan Jin was overly happy and became insane after winning the imperial examination.

Perhaps ancient history is too far away from us, and it is difficult to have a personal experience. Anyone who is a little older knows that in the first few decades of the founding of New China, there were such good things as "top job". If you don't understand this when you are young, ask your parents, they will definitely be able to tell you something. The simple and clear explanation is that a son inherits his father's legacy. At that time, status limited your progress. Those with agricultural household registration could only do farm work in the fields. Such restrictions had certain historical factors. I couldn’t tell whether they were right or wrong. It is also a big social issue and deviates from our theme. I remember that for a recruitment quota in the factory, in addition to the rigid targets: non-agricultural household registration as a prerequisite, party membership or military experience in politics was the icing on the cake. Ordinary farmers and ordinary people can only look at it. At that time, from a poor family, the chances of raising a son were slim.

Nowadays, people from poor families have many ways to change their destiny. This is the result of the development of the times and the benefit of social progress. However, there are always some people who will not behave well even if they receive benefits. The change in the admission rate to the college entrance examination is also a good example that proves that the path to a poor family is getting wider and wider.

However, I once accidentally saw a passage, which probably said that after the independent enrollment was opened, the proportion of people admitted to the university based on bare scores has dropped from the original 70 to about 40. I don’t know Whether this data is true or false, I don’t know where it came from. It was originally a reform and innovation of the admissions system, but it was misinterpreted by some people as an example of the poor families being squeezed again. It seems that the poor families are now in distress.

I don’t know why independent enrollment has become so ugly in their eyes? The document does not stipulate that poor families cannot participate in independent enrollment. On the contrary, I think independent enrollment only opens one more door for poor families. For those who can go beyond the rules, any system is in vain at any time. It is just a special case. Using special cases to generalize to universality is just an error in logical thinking.

I remember that the college entrance examination has just been resumed, and the admission rate of the university is less than 10. Once you pass the exam, you will get the iron rice bowl of the country. If you want to change your identity in the rural areas, it seems that the only way is Huashan. It can be said that thousands of troops have passed through it. Single plank bridge. With the continuous progress of the country, the admission rate of universities is now around 80%. At least, there are books to read. As for the issue of work and income after studying, that is another issue. If a person does not even have basic learning opportunities, where can he find the way to become a noble child? Once a path has been found and there is a way to go, whether you can become a noble son or not depends on your personal cultivation, and you can stop blaming others and society too much.

As for the extent to which one can be called a "noble son", this is a proposition with no fixed answer. If you use your own standards to measure other people's "noble sons", it is an out-and-out gangster logic. If you were originally poor, through studying, you can improve your family and live a life of food and clothing. Such descendants can be called his "noble sons"; if the family has a lot of wealth and further develops the family business through further education, such descendants will naturally be the "noble sons" of the family.

Therefore, in real life, it is not difficult for a poor family to produce a noble son.