If the US group take-out is closed, will the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?

As an ordinary citizen, I always think that from the perspective of an ordinary consumer, if the take-away platform is closed, it will definitely benefit the country and the people for four reasons:

First, before the birth of the take-away platform, merchants delivered meals by themselves, and hundreds of millions of people still solved the problem of eating by themselves. No one was hungry because they didn't send food. Such a platform has led to the current paid meal delivery, and the wool is on the sheep. In the end, consumers pay the bill;

Second, food safety. Personally, I have ordered takeout no more than ten times since the birth of the takeaway platform, and I also choose to be familiar with well-known shops. Mainly because I know a person who specializes in takeout. He doesn't have a physical store or a restaurant. He built a shed next to the toilet and cooked there. In the merchant's words, his own cooking is disgusting.

Third, the birth of take-away food led to an increase in food prices and a platform. Merchants need profits and can only raise prices. It stands to reason that the price of restaurant food should be cheaper than the price of take-away, but we can find that the merchants who increase the price cannot reduce the price just because you are restaurant food. Compared with the take-away platform, the price of restaurant dishes has doubled, but the profit of merchants has not actually doubled. Although there are reasons for the price increase, it is more because of the commission of the platform. After all, if you don't do it, others will do it. As I said before, the cost of restaurants is much lower. Before there was no take-away platform, more people ate in restaurants, and the competition in restaurants was more about the taste and price of food. However, now it is more about reducing costs to ensure that they can survive.

Fourth, the work is hypocritical, and the take-away platform seems to provide many jobs, and a number of professional take-away workers have been born. However, at the same time, it is difficult to recruit people in other industries. Also, in the factory, the salary of five or six thousand yuan a month is not free, so more young people would rather deliver food than enter the service industry such as the factory. In the long run, the cost of employing enterprises will increase, leading to the closure and relocation of enterprises.

As for other e-commerce platforms, taxi platforms, game platforms and live broadcast platforms, each has its own advantages and disadvantages, but far from being harmful to ordinary consumers. So the conclusion is: the advantages of closing the takeaway platform outweigh the disadvantages!

Personally, I think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. The takeaway brother is unemployed, but several times more than the takeaway brother, 10 times more people are out on the street. One takeaway brother is missing, how many service personnel have been added, and how many physical stores have been driven.

There are 4 million less takeaway brothers, 40 million more catering employees, and more otaku and otaku go out to spend, and they consume not only catering, but also other consumption! Increase popularity! Bring prosperity to every corner of the city!

The US Mission is closed, and society is as usual. It's just that there are more people eating in restaurants, the business on the street is booming, unscrupulous restaurants and disgusting snack bars (relying on takeout) will disappear, and workers in construction sites of industrial and mining enterprises are abundant. Not to mention the US Mission, it is not necessarily a bad thing that XX dad and X Dong fell. At least a number of retail enterprises will be saved.

I think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, although technology is very developed now! But people's health is fundamental. You can't rely on takeout for everything. You should go out for a walk and exercise more! Otherwise, the younger generation really has no vitality!

Closing has little effect. The enterprise went bankrupt, and the article was written. Can it be kidnapped by these unscrupulous capitalists? Without Zhang San, there would be Li Si and Wu Zhao. Was the unemployment rate in China very high before the US delegation? No takeout is a good thing for physical catering. It doesn't make much sense what the American delegation does. Eating all your meals is not a good business. Besides, Wang Xing is not a good bird.

The advantages of closing the US group take-out outweigh the disadvantages. Advantages: 1, millions of riders are basically young and middle-aged, which can increase the labor force for national construction; 2, the current take-out is basically junk food, which harms the health of many people; 3. Many regular hotels have increased a lot of business and can operate in a benign way. Disadvantages: capitalists can't exploit money!

merits and demerits

First: Without a tour group, everyone goes out to eat, not only eating, but also visiting the streets to improve their spending power and exercise.

Second: Yellow Riding and Blue Riding run around every meal, causing frequent traffic accidents and harming others and themselves.

Third, and most importantly, most people who order takeout now are young people. The appearance of takeaway not only makes them lazy, but also affects their health by eating too much junk food.

Therefore, no matter from any aspect, the advantages of closing the US Mission outweigh the disadvantages.

Let me talk about catering. Before the US Mission was hungry, there were six people in the 45-square-meter hamburger shop, two in the kitchen and three in the delivery room. Every day until 10 o'clock in the evening, except for salary, rent and water and electricity, there are 20,000-30,000 yuan left every month. After the network platform started, it became worse year by year, and there were still a few left every day until three in the morning. By this year, there are only couples left, a day shift and a night shift, which are open until 6 am every day. The rent should be divided into several cards to make up for Alipay's regular purchases. A lot of work. Basically, no one enters the store, and all orders are placed online. The competition is fierce. Some cheat franchisees, and there is basically no guaranteed profit. The platform gradually increased the collection points from 8 points to 22 points now, and the promotion fee, distribution fee and svip fee were reduced. I calculated that the svip fee is to concentrate the money of merchants and customers on customers. Increase overtime pay at night. The starting point of 4 yuan is basically not lower than that of 5 yuan. Customers pay 16 yuan, and the store basically receives 8/9 yuan. There is no platform for making money on every order. Anyway, many shops are open and are struggling to survive. There are many advantages to shutting down the platform. Going out to spend money will never keep up with the business environment, nor will it move around and close the door. It's a little wordy and unpleasant.

What Meituan and Alibaba and others did was what the supply and marketing cooperatives did in the planned era, but they were transferred from the state to private capitalists, just like plucking geese and accumulating personal wealth. At that time, the supply and marketing cooperatives made money to feed at least10 million families in the system, and also established a stable income generation for the national finance, ensuring quality and quantity. What contribution can the capitalist platform make now besides searching for the people's fat and paste? Those so-called high-tech enterprises with gold on their faces have actually contributed nothing, and a few people have accumulated the wealth of hundreds of millions of people.