What is a villain and what is a gentleman …

Gentlemen love to be straight, while villains always talk nonsense; A gentleman's words and deeds are consistent, and a villain is obedient; Gentlemen pursue harmony, while villains deliberately make trouble; A gentleman severely blames himself, while a villain seeks to harm others; Gentlemen are always in the light, villains are always in the dark; Gentlemen don't remember people, villains make bad friends with people; Gentlemen only seek truth, villains only gangs; A gentleman takes care of the overall situation, while a villain only cares about his own interests; Gentlemen care about face, villains don't care about influence; A gentleman is honest, a villain is hypocritical; An upright man is open and poised, I am timid. A gentleman is enough, but a villain holds it. Gentleman is gentle as spring breeze, villain is insidious as severe frost. Follow-up: How to describe a gentleman and a villain? Answer: Nowadays people seldom mention the word "gentleman", which is very different from that in ancient China. In ancient China, "gentleman" was regarded as a person's highest moral pursuit. Whether it is the way of Confucius and Mencius before the Song Dynasty or the feudal and pedantic Confucianism of Neo-Confucianism in Zhu Cheng after the Song Dynasty, people are educated as "gentlemen". Even the monarch should be required to be "a gentleman's wind", to rule the world with "benevolence" and to level the barbarians with "generosity" These gentlemen hate "little people" and despise their behavior. Judging from the evolution of the word, the word "villain" seems to have not changed qualitatively at present, and it is still a derogatory term. If you are labeled as a "villain", you will become a "ghost" and others will "stay at a respectful distance from others". But the word "gentleman" is different. Now the gentleman is not the "gentleman" that the ancients yearned for. Although it has not become a derogatory term or a neutral word, at least "gentleman" is no longer a "positive" word. The word "gentleman" is more or less ironic If someone calls you a "gentleman", don't be complacent. Listen carefully to whether his voice borrows some kind of "rhetorical device" to swear "no swearing". Especially if the word "gentleman" is added before the word "gentleman", we should pay more attention. "Gentleman" is more ironic than "Gentleman" in modern language. No wonder some people now lament that it was difficult to be a gentleman in ancient times, but it is even harder to be a gentleman now. People who are aboveboard and completely love themselves are disdainful of "romantic alley". It's not that "gentlemen" don't get close to women, but that gentlemen don't abuse women and look down on those who hide evil and shelter evil and sell their souls. This is what gentlemen do, and men do. But it's different now. Friends invite you to some "occasions". Even if you want to lead an honest and clean life, you can't be a gentleman. People will laugh at your cowardice and call you a "gentleman" with their thumbs up, but you will see a kind of sarcasm in their eyes, which means to say to you, "What's so great about you? What are you pretending? Pretend to be lofty. " This gentleman becomes a "hypocrite". I read in the newspaper the other day that an author criticized the ancient typical "gentlemen" from the perspective of modern "hypocrites". He once said that Liu Xiahui said that Liu Xiahui was a man and it was impossible for a woman to hold him in her arms, but why could he "sit still"? Why? It is estimated that Liu Xiahui is "impotent" or "gay". Oh, that's amazing. Now people's thinking is really amazing. No wonder Confucius said, "an upright man is open and poised, little people are often sad." This Liu Xiahui was suddenly called "hypocrite" by a "real villain". It seems that no matter what age, this kind of "hypocrite" is what people hate most. It's easy to be a real villain, because you know this person is a real villain, so you ignore him. And "hypocrite" can be hard to prevent, and "decent" and "well dressed" are all descriptions of "hypocrite". On the surface, he is a gentleman, but behind his back, he is more poisonous than scorpions and snakes. Someone made a couplet to describe a "hypocrite": "On the surface, he is full of morality and righteousness, but behind him, he is covered with thieves and prostitutes." So people think that nothing is more vicious than calling a person a "hypocrite" or "Yue Buqun" (a typical hypocrite in Jin Yong's famous novel the legendary swordsman). However, calling others "hypocrites" requires conditions and qualifications. Either a "real gentleman" or a "real villain". A real gentleman can criticize a "hypocrite" righteously, but it is risky for a "real gentleman" to scold a "hypocrite". First, we must be well-founded, well-founded, well-worded and gentlemanly, otherwise we may be caught by "hypocrites" and bitten by others, and eventually we will become "hypocrites". The real villain is reckless. He is a villain. Swearing doesn't need a reason. He will open his mouth to swear and arrest people, and he is not afraid of other people's attacks, because he is still a villain and can't be a hypocrite. He thinks he is a villain. What's wrong with adding a few villains' abuse? There were many ancient gentlemen, and one or two of them showed that they were indeed gentlemen and did not attract attention. Now the "gentleman" is regarded as a "hypocrite", and no one dares to call himself a gentleman, or even restrain himself with the words and deeds of a gentleman. If they are not careful, they may be accused of "hypocrisy". Originally a kind of cultivation and moral cultivation, it has become an artificial hypocrite. They are inevitably caught by those "real villains" and cursed, making them laugh and cry. Isn't that what Wang Shuo called Jin Yong the year before last? Jin Shifu was quite a gentleman in the article he responded to, but what was the result? It is also called "hypocrite" language by "true villain". This reminds me of a book at home. This book collection is the annotation of The Analects published during the Cultural Revolution, and every word of Confucius is annotated on it. No matter that sentence, it can be criticized as a "hypocrite". It makes people laugh and cry, and there are more and more crimes, which are beyond words. Some people want to be "real villains" more than "hypocrites". "Little people" is terrible. The ancients said, "It is better to offend a gentleman than a villain." It seems that this little man is not to be taunted. Therefore, in some books that teach people to socialize, we often see "knowledge" such as "how to get along with villains", "how to deal with villains in the office" and "black virtue and anti-black virtue". It can be seen that the "villain" is a great threat to people, which may be why some people are willing to be "villains". It is not easy to be a villain. You must be flexible, carrot and stick, flatter, curse and hurt. You have a thick heart and a thick skin, and your six parents don't recognize the best. This has reached the highest realm of villains-"true villains." If you can reach this level, you can be both successful and invincible. Everyone "respects" you and stays away from you, but you have to be reviled by others behind your back. Even if someone spits in your face with a "bah", you should be able to take out a handkerchief and wipe your face and giggle and say, "Good spitting! Good spit! " In fact, "gentlemen" and "villains" belong to the minority in life. Most of them are ordinary people who are neither gentlemen nor villains. As Hou, the master of crosstalk, said on his deathbed: There are few bad people and few good people in the world, but most of them are not bad people or bad people. It is these neither bad nor bad people who support the world. If you really let these ordinary people say that they are more willing to be gentlemen or villains. I think I can honestly say that I don't want to do either. This reminds me of a passage asked by Gan Long in the TV series Prime Minister Liu, "Little Shenyang, do you say you are a traitor or a loyal minister?" Shenyang said, "Your Majesty, I am neither a traitor nor a loyal minister. Treacherous officials are scolded, and loyal officials are too tired. I can only be a' jester' at best. " People in life are generally like this. I am neither a gentleman nor a hypocrite, because I am too tired to be a gentleman. Don't be a villain, be a villain? Although everyone is afraid, it is also pointed out by a thousand people that ten thousand people revile and make a child's wife suffer indignities. He is an ordinary person, but no matter who he is, if you ask him such a question, I think his answer should be yes. The question is, do you want to be a man! The word "gentleman" is not specifically for men, but a broad word, and women can also be called "gentlemen". It is often heard that someone praises a woman and says, "You are really a heroine and a husband among women!" Being a "gentleman" has always been the wish and life goal of China people. As we know, the central hall in Buddhist temples is called "Daxiong Hall". Few people know its meaning, or mistake it for a "grand and solemn palace". In fact, "Hero Hall" means "Male Hall", "Xiong" means "husband" (it doesn't mean "male" or "female" anymore), and "Daxiong" means "male". It can be seen that people worship "gentlemen". Why are "gentlemen" always popular? Because a gentleman can be a gentleman, a villain or even a hypocrite. Why do you say that? Because "Gentleman" pays attention to a state of mind, not a means. "Gentleman", "villain" and the poor all have their own views on the gentleman. "Gentleman" said: "A gentleman walks between heaven and earth, and should hold his head high and hold his head high! That's good! Open and aboveboard, open-minded, ups and downs. The stomach of a mouse and the intestines of a chicken are the masterpieces of villains! "Little people" said: "To be a hero in life and a husband in the world, we must do everything we can to make me lose to the whole world and not let the whole world lose to me. The so-called small amount is not a gentleman, non-toxic is not a husband! A gentleman should be able to take up and let go, not indecisive. Hesitation is a woman's opinion! "Gentleman" said: "A gentleman should be faithful and unyielding. The so-called scholar can be killed but not humiliated. If necessary, he should sacrifice his life for justice. Qu Yuan disdained turbidity and led himself into the Miluo River. Ji Kang was not afraid to play the piano in a crisis, and Wen Tianxiang was captured and died heroically. Fear of death, flies and dogs are done by men! The "villain" said: "A gentleman can bend and stretch, can bend straight, can compromise and protect himself, and can wait for time to explore the map. I didn't know that Gou Jian, the King of Yue, entered Wu as a slave, led a horse to taste dung and bowed down, but he finally returned to China and was defeated by Fu Cha. Han Xin was humiliated in crossing, Sima Qian was ashamed of greed, but he was a gentleman in the end! It can be seen that it is the word' gentleman' to guide the situation and improvise! " "Gentleman" said: "Gentleman should serve the country and the people, be loyal to the country, be loyal to his duties, save the nation and save the people from fire and water! It is the true nature of a gentleman to retire and make way for his position. Don't you see that Zhuge Wuhou is responsible for entrusting orphans, repaying kindness and caring for the poor, and mending the sky with one arm? Although he knows that he can't do it, he will try his best to make a name for himself until he dies! Yue Wumu was loyal to the country, and the handsome army resisted gold, which was immortal. They can't compare with the Han thief Cao and the traitor Qin Gui. This is a gentleman! " "Little People" said: "The ancients said:' Irregular voting for foreign countries; If the father is dishonest, the son will run home. "A gentleman should put the world first. sky