How do the relocated tenants apply for store compensation?

There are three ways: first, take the initiative to find the landlord. What if the landlord is stupid enough to really give it? The second is to find the demolition department to make trouble. What if the person in charge of demolition has a pit in his head? The third is to sue the court for judgment. What if the judge is an amateur guest? It is said that people need a little dream. What if it comes true?

The above are all paragraphs, but the subject is not "in case" yourself! Now from the perspective of demolition, use the topic to analyze whether the tenant can get compensation when demolition.

The basic principle of any demolition project, that is, house expropriation, is to negotiate with the legal owner of the house, that is, to talk about demolition with the owner of the house, and the demolition money will only be paid to the owner of the house in the end. The lessee is not within the negotiation scope of the house expropriation unit.

After the expropriation unit signs a house expropriation agreement with the house owner and pays compensation, the lessee's problem will be solved by the house owner himself. If the lessee refuses to relocate due to undecided negotiation with the landlord, the house expropriation unit may take compulsory measures to vacate the house first and then demolish it. As for the dispute between the tenant and the landlord, it does not belong to the house expropriation unit to solve.

Generally speaking, tenants can be simply divided into two types, one is living tenants and the other is operating tenants. For the resident tenant, there is no actual loss when the rental house is demolished, so there is no compensation. Ask the landlord for a month's rent reduction at most.

However, there are often other things in life. In a collection project I have been engaged in, there is a tenant who has lived in a relative's house for five years and has never paid the rent, asking to enjoy the wonderful work of house collection and compensation with his relatives! The reason is that the house itself has lived for more than five years and should have other rights. Of course, in the end, it was all an idiotic dream, just a joke!

Another kind of commercial tenant, although he signed a similar agreement with the landlord that "in case of force majeure, unconditional cooperation is needed", can seek partial relocation compensation from the landlord through negotiation because the demolition has indeed caused actual operating losses and the commercial operating rent is also high.

Operating tenants, the compensation involved is roughly: renovation costs, loss of production and business suspension and relocation costs. These kinds of compensation will be calculated to the landlord when the house is demolished, which creates a prerequisite for the tenant to ask the landlord for reasonable compensation.

1) Decoration expenses. Many storefronts are decorated by tenants. When they were demolished, the lease contract did not expire and the contract was terminated, resulting in the renovation not being used until the contract expired. For example, the renovation investment is 654.38 million yuan, the lease period is 2 years, and the monthly renovation cost is about 4,000 yuan. If the house is demolished after only one year's rent, then at least 50,000 yuan of renovation costs need to be negotiated with the landlord.

2) Loss due to suspension of production or business. Because of the interruption of normal operation caused by demolition, the loss of production and business suspension can also be applied to the landlord.

3) Relocation expenses. Shops or factories need to relocate goods or equipment, because the contract has not expired, and the relocation fee can also be used as a negotiation condition.

In theory, the above three expenses can only be claimed from the landlord, and the initiative is always in the hands of the landlord. Therefore, the lion's opening his mouth and asking for exorbitant prices will only lead to the failure of the negotiations and may not get any compensation in the end.

Tenants and landlords, on the issue of demolition, tenants will always be in a weak position, even if the tenant's losses are great, the landlord will not necessarily give any compensation. In this case, the tenant either admits that he is unlucky or takes legal measures.

Therefore, if the tenant's own losses are large enough, and he can provide relevant evidence and invest in legal means, he can ask for reasonable compensation and safeguard his own rights and interests!