Why doesn't the teacher admit that mathematics is a gift?

However, this mathematics does not mean elementary mathematics in primary and secondary schools or general elective courses in the generation of high numbers and lines. Just as Chinese doesn't need any talent, it's hard to say when it comes to literature.

It happens that mathematics can be called mathematics at all stages.

The so-called talent, just like Einstein can imagine a four-dimensional space in legend, Gauss claimed to have finished drawing a regular heptagon with a ruler and a ruler himself when he was a student, and Fermat wrote in the corner that I thought of a subtle proof that the place was too small to write.

As for the college entrance examination mathematics, one test 140, one test 80, doesn't mean anything. There are too few people with so-called mathematical talent. Even the provincial and national awards of the Olympic Games are mostly obtained by practice and experience.

Finally, the gap between those who are really talented in mathematics and us is obvious, and it is not as simple as taking a few more exams. Exams, especially those with test sites and teaching materials, will never test the so-called talent.

Only by knocking down the achievement wall can we talk about talent. And the vast majority of students are not working hard enough to talk about talent!

I was admitted to a 985 university with a score of 630, which is a good result in our world. And above my grades, there is a little girl with general talent who studies hard.

Our school will be divided into classes next semester and officially start high school study. I was assigned from the liberal arts class to the science class. As soon as I entered the class, I entered the top five. My only impression of her at that time was that she always asked me questions, but she still didn't understand. She took a notebook and went back to learn by rote. I can't help laughing at her for studying too hard. Then she simply stopped looking for me and asked someone else. After that, there was no intersection, and the grades were far from good, so I ignored her.

Last semester in senior three, I experienced several months of confusion. Addicted to DOTA, my grades dropped. Later, I repented and turned over a new leaf, studied hard and returned to the top five. Then I looked at the report card and suddenly found that she was very close to me! I'm surprised. How did she get up here? At that time, I didn't think much, so I attributed her sudden improvement in grades to "enlightenment." Sure enough, several subsequent exams proved that she was "enlightened" and could get better every time. She scored 635 points in the college entrance examination and was admitted to Central South University in advance.

When the school commended outstanding candidates, I went to the school and chatted with the teacher "Lao Zhang". I'm a little surprised by the sharp improvement in her grades. Lao Zhang was even more surprised. Lao Zhang didn't notice when she came up. So Lao Zhang brought up the history report card with the results of each multi-school joint exam. We were surprised to find that she didn't have any "sudden increase in grades" She rose a little at a time, and it took her three years to climb to the level of 985 University. Every time the increase was so small that Lao Zhang didn't even notice it.

As far as talent is concerned, she is quite poor! Those who don't understand mathematics and physics rely on rote learning, and the speed of rote learning is not fast. Such people finally achieved enviable results in high school, which is the crystallization of persistence and hard work. I can't compare with her! In my academic career, my grades are much better than mine, but not many people can make me admire her. Because she did what I could have done but didn't do, she finally got the score I didn't get. Although not much difference, but also gave me a lesson, called "heaven rewards diligence."

Indeed! In learning, talent is very important, and sometimes talent is decisive. But, ah, only by doing your best can we talk about the importance of talent. I didn't work hard, I didn't insist, I tasted it, and finally I said, "I have no talent." This is just an excuse to be lazy!

Efforts+methods, as long as it does not drag down the family, there is no big problem in getting the national volume 550. Is it really difficult to get 550-560 points by reciting those fixed questions that change the soup without changing the medicine? Do you really need any talent? No need!