Four-person debate on classical Chinese

1. The classic four arguments are about two people, A and B. A pursues personal self-discipline and opposes heteronomy, while B insists on personal self-discipline and needs heteronomy. The two values are tit for tat.

One day, in the face of an incident, B commented heavily and gave a good heteronomy. So, A couldn't stand it anymore and jumped out to criticize: You are heteronomy, you are moralist, you are pseudo-morality, and you are wrong. We should be self-disciplined rather than heteronomy.

Naturally, if B refuses, he will fight back. In the long run, he has his own ideas, and there is no result in the end. Another day, B suddenly found that A was "heteronomy" others, so he thought he had something, jumped out and said, well, you also said to be self-disciplined and not heteronomy. What are you doing now? Aren't you heteronomy? Aren't you slapping yourself? Didn't you say one thing and do another? B thought that A would be speechless and might even be ashamed. But when A heard this, he smiled indifferently and answered unhurriedly: Look, little B, you are superficial, and your understanding is low. Don't you know what "should" is and what "should" is? In other words, what I told you is true, that is, what things should look like. My specific behavior belongs to the category of "truth", that is, what things actually look like. Now "truth" is inconsistent with "reality", but this does not mean that "reality" is wrong, that is to say, I actually did not do what I said.

B is speechless. Another day, B couldn't hold back again, so A stood up again, even with indecent words, B naturally responded. Finally, the argument ended in a hubbub.

But after a long time, B suddenly woke up. Shit, A just wouldn't let me discipline others and criticized me. Isn't this heteronomy? Since he advocates self-discipline, I will discipline others, which is none of his business. He just needs self-discipline. Why did he punish me, NND? Why didn't he take this back at him just now? So he felt a twinge of regret. But the opportunity came again. On this day, B found A "heteronomy" and jumped out to criticize A.. B obviously forgot the last lesson. All the readers are smarter than B and obviously know what A will do. There is nothing new. A did the same thing again, and still responded with the profound philosophy of should and should.

As you can imagine, B still has nothing. Although A can't refute B, it always seems to be in an invincible position easily. What's the problem? B at a loss, meditating under the bodhi tree.

It was not until the forty-ninth day after July, 77 that a bodhi leaf fell on B's head, awakening B from meditation, and B suddenly realized that it was so. B thinks that heteronomy is inevitable on the basis of self-discipline, so we have to obey the rules. He was afraid that one day he would be caught by others when he was heteronomy, saying, look at what you were like before. How can you criticize others? This is hypocrisy, hypocrite.

A there is no such mental shackles. When others are heteronomy, it is natural that A can criticize heteronomy with address unknown's mouth and advocate self-discipline. And A doesn't have to worry about being criticized when he sees that others are not pleasing to the eye and have yellow teeth and swear words. Here is the best shield of "reality". Noisy, you are naive, you are superficial, what, ask me if I will be ashamed and blame myself for often not being able to do this? Shit, how is that possible? Why should I be ashamed and blame myself? I have been longing for it in my heart! What? You also said, don't do to others what you don't want others to do to you? Shit, am I not? Can't you see I've been longing for it? Of course, I ask others to be self-disciplined because I want to be self-disciplined. Please note that the "desire" here should mean "thinking" and has nothing to do with "doing", so I thought about it and that's enough! What? What else do you have to say, push yourself and others? What kind of reason is this? Fuck it! I don't recognize this principle. B also found that such behavior can be copied by himself to refute A, but it doesn't seem to make much sense, because at most B is in an invincible position at the same time, but on the other hand, it is impossible to really refute A in this way. Actually, A is invincible.

When faced with an invincible debater, everything you do will look very retarded. Moreover, there is a very important point. If you copy A's way of debating, B feels that although he is a little stupid, he is far from thick-skinned.

Finally, to sum up A's debating skills, there are three points. First, I regard my core point of view in the debate as "what should it be". If all my remarks on other occasions conflict with this, it will inevitably be classified as "what". What I really thought and thought at that time was not important, the most important thing was to hit my opponent. This way is the enemy of honesty and sincerity. In short, it means thick-skinned.

Second: If there is any loophole in the debate, confuse it, bypass it, distort it and ignore it. Anyway, just don't look at it like your opponent. In short, it means thick-skinned. Third: when debating, use the strictest standards for others and the loosest standards for yourself. Oh, not accurate enough. To be precise, there is no need to have standards for yourself. When others have problems, use the strictest standards to stifle them. When you have a problem, ask others for tolerance with the most "free", "tolerant" and "rational" heart. In short: be thick-skinned.

Get these three flavors, protect your health, and things are unbeaten! Mao Dan replied 1, the standard of self-discipline is definitely subjective, but sociality actually lowers the standard of self-discipline. 2. In practice, there are often a lot of irrational deficiencies in individual self-discipline. This situation also requires him to realize that his behavior is harmful to himself and others, and he may be punished. If he doesn't let him, he will be ignorant and fearless and continue to make mistakes. I asked what would happen if he relied entirely on other laws, so the cost of maintaining order in this society would be high, but it would not happen. Because it's better than.

2. Debate on Classical Chinese ~ ~ We don't advocate writing classical Chinese in a hurry, because we modern people speak modern Chinese and write modern Chinese.

For example, classical English can't be used in the United Nations. Of course, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China should use modern language when making announcements and engaging in business activities.

So we primary and middle school students should focus on learning modern languages. Do you want to learn classical Chinese? I think we should learn a little. The purpose is to understand the literary talent of our ancient culture in China.

Knowing the glory of our ancient culture in China will make them a little interested and have a sense of national pride, but the main time and energy should be spent on learning modern Chinese well. At present, classical Chinese accounts for 50% in high school textbooks, but we spend more than 50% of our time studying and get less than 20%, so we are overwhelmed with learning classical Chinese.

Those rural areas with low cultural level can't even teach modern Chinese well, let alone classical Chinese. I think the basis of learning modern Chinese well is to learn standard modern Chinese well.

Vernacular Chinese is a modern vernacular Chinese, which has always had its own products. It evolved not from classical Chinese, but from modern vernacular Chinese, which evolved from medieval vernacular Chinese. I don't agree with Mr Han. He said that only by learning classical Chinese well can we learn vernacular Chinese well. This is misleading. For example, you get drunk after eating, and you get drunk after drinking. You can't say I'll get drunk, can you? ! Mr. Zhu Ziqing said that vernacular Chinese is much more refined and rigorous than classical Chinese. Why not take the time to learn it? Classical Chinese cannot be regarded as a necessary learning condition for modern Chinese.

I think there is no logical connection between learning classical Chinese and learning vernacular Chinese. For example, Kong Yi is good at talking, but his classical Chinese is not good. We don't need to learn the vernacular by learning classical Chinese, but we can learn the vernacular books we are exposed to now. Lu Xun and Guo Moruo are both literary masters, but they also write vernacular Chinese. They experienced the classical Chinese era and the classical Chinese situation, so in the May 4th period, they proposed to oppose old literature through new culture and advocate new literature.

If every pore of Lu Xun is soaked in the sauce jar of classical Chinese, he can't be Lu Xun. Lu Xun is the main leader of the New Culture Movement. He uses modern ideas, modern concepts and modern thinking. Should I speak classical Chinese, publish articles, engage in negotiations and speak at the United Nations? It is an iron fact that classical Chinese has no vitality so far.

Man has created all the knowledge, and no one in the world can master it all. Therefore, our society must have a division of labor. In the words of ordinary people, it is to knock gongs to sell sugar, do their own things, and specialize in what Han Yu said. After entering the university, it is necessary for those who study the history of Chinese mathematics to master classical Chinese. However, in other words, we do not advocate that all primary and secondary school students devote a lot of energy to learning classical Chinese, because most of them do not necessarily need to be workers, farmers, businessmen and leading cadres in the future.

I can say that in our Chinese Department, ancient Chinese is the most troublesome course for China students. Some of our college students say that reading a few pages of ancient Chinese before going to bed at night can replace taking sleeping pills. I don't think I have been particularly interested in classical Chinese since primary school, because I don't have that kind of learning environment. As a primary school student, when you told him, "Let's straighten my cloudy sail and build a bridge in the deep sea," he didn't understand the meaning at all. He can only shake his head and back. Parents watch their children recite these things all day, and it must be very uncomfortable when their children are struggling to recite them. I think there is another simple reason. Our language is used for communication, so that everyone can understand it first, which means that primary school students must be able to communicate with others first. Besides, in any case, parents now teach their children dialects at birth.

Go back to the basics and apply what you have learned. Some people either speak vernacular or classical Chinese. They are all Chinese, and the fundamental function of language is communication. This is spoken and written language, and it is also a tool for thinking. I do admit that classical Chinese is very concise, but sometimes it is difficult for us to understand because it is too concise.

When I was studying Yueyang Tower, I participated in the interpretation of a word. In the textbook, "the second year" means the third year, but our Chinese teacher said that this new textbook had just been revised this year, and then I felt that this made me doubt. The notes in classical Chinese were given by predecessors and later changed. Learning classical Chinese in this way can't grasp its main points at all, and there is no need to learn classical Chinese. I want to ask you a question. On April 22nd, China Education News put forward the view that you can't find your way home without learning classical Chinese. What I want to ask you is, where is our home? Mr. Lu Xun said, I opened the history, which is full of benevolence, righteousness and morality. After watching it carefully for a long time, I saw two words eating people from the cracks. This country is a home full of ethical procedures of monarch, minister and son and strict feudal hierarchy. This family has no human rights, no equality and no law. Should we take the teenagers back? We should inherit the excellent cultural heritage, but we don't have to ask everyone to understand it deeply. Classical Chinese itself has a certain depth and difficulty, and it is impossible for everyone to understand and understand the truth.

Since it is difficult, why not let a few people inherit it like classical music and folk dance, instead of asking everyone? I want to distinguish one of the most basic concepts: learning, appreciation and edification.

What we disapprove of is the proportion of strong classical Chinese in basic education. Instead of opposing the edification of classical Chinese.

The same is contact with classical Chinese, which is the mentality of two different concepts. One is the national historical and cultural tradition accumulated behind me for thousands of years. We can rely on it as a big tree, not as a burden to each of us. Classical Chinese is divorced from our real life, so it is inevitable that vernacular Chinese will replace classical Chinese in primary and secondary school textbooks.

Also, the opposing views don't learn classical Chinese! Reason: Classical Chinese is only useful for learning ancient books, and it has disappeared in daily life, just like we are chatting here.

One of four people will meet in one's life. One of the four people will meet in one's life. The first one is yourself, the second one is the one you love most, the third one is the one who loves you most, and the fourth one is the one who has used it all his life. First you will meet the person you love the most, and then you will feel the feeling of love; Because you know what it feels like to be loved, you can find the person who loves you the most; When you have experienced love and being loved and learned to love, you will know what you need and find the person who suits you best and can get along with you for a lifetime.

But sadly, in real life, these three people are usually not the same person; What you love most often won't choose you; What loves you most is often not what you love most; And the longest, it happened that it was not you who loved you the most, but the person who appeared at the most appropriate time. Who will you be in someone else's life? No one wants to change his mind on purpose. He really loves you when he loves you, but he really doesn't love you when he doesn't. If he loves you, he can't pretend not to love you. Similarly, he can't pretend to love you when he doesn't love you.

When a person doesn't love you and wants to leave you, you should ask yourself if you still love him. If you don't love him, don't refuse to leave because of your poor self-esteem. If you still love him, you should hope that he is happy and stay with the person he really loves, and you will never stop him. If you stop him from getting real happiness, you don't love him anymore. If you don't love him, who are you to accuse him of changing his mind? Love is not possession. You like the moon. You can't take it down and put it in the washbasin, but the light of the moon can still shine into your room. In other words, if you love someone, you can have it in another way, and make your lover an eternal memory in your life. If you really love a person, you should love him for what he really is-love his good, love his bad; love his good, love his bad. You mustn't want him to be what you want just because you love him. If you don't succeed, you won't love him.

You can't say why you really love someone. You only know that you want this person to accompany you whenever and wherever you are in a good mood. True love is that two people can stay together in the most difficult time, but there is no requirement at all. After all, feelings must be paid, not just wanted; Separation is an inevitable test. If your relationship is not stable enough, you have to give up. True love does not turn into resentment.

What about you? Which one did you find? Who did you meet in the vast sea of people? Who met you again? .

4. Primary school looking for Yang's four sons in classical Chinese:

Liang's son is nine years old and very clever. Junping Kong thought of his father, but when his father was away, he shouted. In order to set fruit, there are bayberry. Confucius pointed out to his son and said, "This is the fruit of your family." The son replied, "I haven't heard that peacock is a master of poultry."

In the state of Liang, there is a family named Yang. There is a nine-year-old son at home. He is very clever. One day, Junping Kong came to visit his father. It happened that his father was not at home, so Junping Kong called the child out. The child brought Junping Kong fruits, including bayberry. Junping Kong pointed to Yangmei and showed it to the children, saying, "This is the fruit of your family." The child immediately replied, "I haven't heard that peacock is your bird."

The original "Boya Juexian"—

Boya is good at playing drums, but Zhong Ziqi is good at listening. Boya Guqin, looking at the mountains in the distance, Zhong Ziqi said, "Well, I am like Mount Tai!" Determined to run water, Zhong Ziqi said, "Good, like a river!" Zhong Ziqi will understand what Boya said. When he died as a child, Boya said that there was no bosom friend in the world, but he broke the piano and never played drums all his life.

translate

Yu Boya is good at playing the piano and Zhong Ziqi is good at listening to it. When Boya played the piano, he thought of showing the mountains. Zhong Ziqi listened to the praise and said, "Great, I seem to see the towering Mount Tai!" Boya wanted to express the flowing water in his heart, so Zhong Ziqi said, "Great, just like a running river!" No matter what Boya wants to express, Zhong Ziqi can accurately express his ideas. After Zhong Ziqi died, Boya found it difficult to find someone who could understand his piano, so he broke his beloved piano and stopped playing it for life.

Confucius traveled eastward and saw two children arguing and asked them why.

A child said, "I think the sun is close to the sky at sunrise and far from the sky at noon." . "

A Confucius said, "I am far away at the beginning of the day, and I am near in Japan."

A son said, "The sunrise is as big as a car cover. At noon, it is like a plate: a container for holding things, a round plate and a square bowl. This is not too small for the far, but too big for the near? "

Another child said, "The sun just came out to cool down, and it was as hot as putting your hand in hot water at noon. Isn't that why you feel hot when you are near and cool when you are far away?" ? "

Hearing this, Confucius could not judge who was right or wrong. The two children smiled and said to Confucius, "Who said you were smart?" ? "

When Confucius traveled eastward, he saw two children arguing and asked them what they were arguing about.

A child said, "I think the sun is close to people when it first comes out, and far away from people at noon."

A child said, "I think the sun is far when it first comes out and near at noon."

original text

Learn chess.

Qiu Yi is the best athlete in this country. Let Qiu Yi teach two people to play chess, one to concentrate on playing chess, and Qiu Yi listens; Although one person thought it was a swan, he tried to shoot it with his bow. Although I learned chess from the previous one, chess is still not as good as the previous one. Is it because his intelligence is not as good as the former? That's not true.

translate

Qiu Yi is the best Go player in China. Let Qiu Yi teach two people to play Go. One of them was so absorbed that he listened carefully, pondered and understood everything Qiu Yi said. On the surface, another person is also listening to Qiu Yi's teaching, but in his heart, he thinks the swan is coming and thinks about how to shoot it down with a bow and arrow. Although they learn Go together, the latter is not as good as the former. Isn't his intelligence inferior to the former? Answer: it's not like this.

A child said, "When the sun first came out, it was as big as the roof of a carriage." By noon, it's as big as a plate, isn't it far (it looks)

Small and close (looks) big? "

(Another) A child said, "It's cool as soon as the sun comes out, and it's like entering a bathhouse at noon. Isn't that as close as possible? "

The hotter, the farther away. Is it getting cold? "

Confucius can't decide (who is right and who is wrong). Two children laughed at Confucius and said, "Who says you know much?"