Joke Collection Website - Joke collection - Man's Three Views and Cognition

Man's Three Views and Cognition

"The difference between people lies in cognition."

every adult has his own world outlook, outlook on life and values, which is called "three views" for short. The determinants of the formation of the three views include cognitive ability. Conversely, the three views have an important influence on cognitive ability. The gap of cognitive ability is related to heredity, environment and the accumulation of social experience and knowledge. Masters make a list of books according to their own needs and study purposefully. Most people read casually and read whatever they get. The mind of reading will refresh our cognition and greatly improve our learning ability, understanding ability and thinking ability.

look at the following case, the difference of cognition about one thing and different people.

An old soldier looked up and said proudly, Do you know where this plane took off? It is at the nearest airport.

we built that airport.

Wow, everyone stared: This is a big project. How much did it earn?

The old soldier smiled: It was a long time ago to make money from wool. In those days, the country was poor, and all of us soldiers were full of blood and dedication. Therefore, the airport was completely built by our soldiers, and there was no money. And it is voluntary to go to work and bring your own tools. It is precisely because of our soldiers' selfless dedication that Qian Qian has thousands of airports and highways and our happy life today. Although we didn't make any money, it was our glory and pride.

everyone stood in awe and applauded.

The old soldier saluted everyone shyly and got up to leave.

When the old soldier left, a businessman spoke at the scene:

I really respect soldiers. I just feel that this is not completely right.

everyone asks: what's wrong?

The businessman said: What can I say about this? What do you mean the country is poor? A lean camel is bigger than a horse, and a poor country is richer than an individual, right? Even if there was no money at the time, should it be made up afterwards? I don't have an opinion on voluntary labor either, but as a country, the most important thing is rules, and rules are greater than fairness. The normal operation of the country cannot always require others to make unilateral contributions, but should be based on fair trade and a virtuous circle.

After the businessman left, a moralist got up and said,

What the businessman said just now is not entirely right.

I'm not against fairness, nor do I support rules. But from the perspective of society as a whole, a society can't go into a narrow trading misunderstanding. If everything is measured by cold money, how much warmth can there be left in this world? What harm does it mean if the selfless dedication of soldiers can't get a fair evaluation from fat businessmen? If selfless dedication can't get the respect it deserves, how cold will the world become?

The moralist stood up humbly, saluted everyone and left.

The moralist left and an economist came out:

I agree with what the moralist said just now.

from an economic point of view, an airport has created the added value of wealth from the start of construction to the completion of construction, and the total wealth has increased, and the currency issued by the country has also increased accordingly.

This increased amount of money includes the airport that soldiers are obliged to build.

But the soldiers didn't get the money, and there was no compensation afterwards.

Then the question comes: Who took the money?

when the economist finished speaking, everyone was stunned for a moment and suddenly applauded together.

The economist waved and left.

After the economist left, another social psychologist came out:

I agree with what the scholar said just now, and I am very inspired.

however, the composition of human society is not limited to the dimension of economy.

many things are difficult to trade.

the value is subjective and the price is estimated. If everything is transacted, the result will be that the partners overestimate their contributions. Therefore, in some families, loving couples become bitter spouses because both sides overestimate their own efforts. Therefore, some friends turn against each other and become enemies, that is, they overestimate their value and role in friendship. Therefore, many team disputes continue, just because everyone in the team feels that they have suffered.

because this reward can't be sifted out from the huge economic aggregate, the contribution of soldiers, like blood imported into the social body, is integrated into each of us. The money issued by the new airport was remitted to the total amount of money and appeared in each of our wallets.

there was a moment's silence, and then warm applause broke out.

The master took off his hat and left.

The master of social psychology exits, and the systematist comes out:

A society, like a complete organism, must operate in an orderly and benign way.

Just like a human body, there are heart, liver, spleen, kidney and lung inside and mouth, eyes, ears, nose and tongue outside. Each organ has its own function, but at the same time it is consuming the energy of human tissues. Therefore, any organ must be of moderate size. It is not good to be small, but if it is too big, it will squeeze other organs and hinder human health.

But the reason why voluntary labor wins respect is that it, like the liver in the human body, is confined to the beneficial range. If this scope is too large, normal business practices will be accused for no reason. Legal transactions, and thus bear great moral pressure. So the businessman was the first to speak, because he felt a strong psychological discomfort. This is like the human liver is too big and squeezed into other organs.

Our society needs both soldiers and businessmen. We need moralists, economists and social psychologists. This is just like the five internal organs of the human body. Everyone should do their own work, respect and help each other, and this society will get better and better.

The systematologist left, and a cognitive scientist came out:

It is a fact that soldiers are obliged to build airports.

This fact constitutes the memory of the client's life, so he is proud of it.

Then we heard the emotions of businessmen, and then we heard the position of moralists. The two are opposite to each other and exist because of each other's existence.

Then we saw the economic dimension of the event, and drew out the social psychological dimension of the event. The two are still a pair of three-dimensional, forming a new cognitive level.

from this, we know that when we face a thing, the first reaction is instinct, the second reaction is emotion, the third reaction is position, the fourth reaction is benefit, and the fifth reaction is to give consideration to the social psychology of others. The sixth reaction is to realize that the first five steps are not superior or inferior, but five components of a complete cognition.

the same is true for the discussion of social issues.

When social issues are discussed, you will clearly see five levels: instinctive level, emotional level, position level, interest level and social psychological level.

few people can observe the cognitive level of the system unless you are at a higher cognitive level.

People who are at the instinctive stage will think that everyone is at this level because of their closed vision. I will be shocked by the emergence of different opinions and think that the other person is mentally ill.

people in the emotional layer despise people who only have instinct, but they don't know that they are mired in intense emotions.

those who are in the position are worried and bear the anxiety of hiding evil and promoting good.

people at the interest level, facing a large number of instinctive public, emotional public and position public, have a sense of floating, but they don't know that they are caught in professional paranoia.

those who are at the level of social psychological cognition are open-minded and far-sighted, but they don't realize that although they have seen the overall situation, they have not jumped out of it.

Everyone has his own lofty aspirations and great ideals, and there will definitely be differences in cognition and three views. If you want to achieve unity, it is necessary for both of you to have a node that sings * * *, otherwise it is simply an idiotic dream. He means that different people have different aspirations and different heights. Don't think that he will be able to understand you, because there are very few people in the world who can understand you, and most people, things and things need time to verify.

if you want someone to identify with you, stand with you. Then you don't have to argue with people at different levels. Because there are too many arguments, people will get bored. Fierce struggle will lead to emotional estrangement. People who understand you, you express yourself a little, and he will understand; People who don't understand you, you wear out your mouth, and they still don't take you seriously. Different roads don't work together, and different roads don't have to go together.

You know, the eagle is attached to the sky, and the sparrow likes the branches. When you tell the sparrow how vast the sky is, it tells you how comfortable the branches are. Chickens talk to ducks, and it's no use arguing! It's no use playing the lute to a cow. Answer irrelevant questions, is it meaningful to argue?

Like a frog sitting in a well watching the sky, he is unwilling to walk out of his narrow world from the bottom of his heart. If you tell him how beautiful the outside world is, he will take it as a lie and think that what you say is a fable. Different worlds, what are you arguing with him for? It doesn't make any sense. Even if you win over him, you will be laughed at, and you will argue with the "fool". What's the point of winning?

As the saying goes, there is no need to argue or blindly ask for anyone's approval. He doesn't understand you, and it's no use talking too much. Instead of arguing with him, it's better to turn around and go their own way. If we want to get along with each other for a long time and gain recognition, what we can do is not to argue, but to let go.

let, which shows a person's mind, reflects a person's tolerance and mind. Let's take a step forward and take a step back! In this world, no one needs to cater to anyone, and no one needs to please anyone. Only when two people agree on three views can they come together and go a long way. If the three views disagree, no matter how many arguments there are, they will not go the same way.

in fact, sometimes, yours is not necessarily right, and his is not necessarily wrong. It's just that your living environment is different, and the roads you have traveled since childhood are different. Why fight? Different people have different hearts and have different degrees of understanding and acceptance of one thing. Don't always think about fighting, and you don't need to force each other's approval.

what he thinks is his business. If he can't understand us, we won't take it seriously. People who know you will treat you well, but those who don't know you don't need to talk to him! What kind of person you want to be, how much effort you have to make! If you want to have a circle, you must first improve yourself!

The goal in your mind is your whole world, and your world is your whole life! Don't always think about fighting, and make more achievements. When you can fully realize yourself and make continuous achievements, you will meet more people who know and understand you.

In this world, different people take different roads and different hearts have different skies. When you are not understood, don't be discouraged. Just have a clear conscience and be frank.

Please never argue with people with different cognitive levels! The circle that can't be squeezed in doesn't have to be forced into it. If other people's words are unbearable, don't listen; If you don't like other people's affairs, then don't look at them. Why bother yourself?

Life is too short. There are too many people, things and things to experience. Don't always let yourself struggle in pain. Remember that people's hearts are different, be more empathetic and considerate of each other, win people's hearts with inclusive sincerity, and decorate life with a happy attitude! ? Only in this way can our life be valuable and meaningful, otherwise all our efforts will be like drawing water with a sieve. Why care about people and things that have nothing to do with you?

Being the best self is the best proof!

If we solve the above ideological problems, we can communicate with each other smoothly.

Attachment: Nine levels of cognition

The first level, the bottom, only knows likes and dislikes

This is a human being in the infant tense, who eats when he is hungry, regardless of the occasion, pulls when he is full, regardless of the place.

This is also an extremely emotional group. They are always in an embarrassing situation because of the lack of cognition, but they can't find a solution.

For example, in the TV series "in the name of people", there was a worker Wang Wenge of Dafeng Factory. He was a victim, and his equity was taken away by corrupt officials and profiteers. As a result, he fell into a rage and put a knife rest around the neck of Chen Yanshi, an old cadre. As a result, Comrade Wang Wenge was imprisoned with corrupt officials.

In reality, there are many such people who can't get rid of their emotions all their lives. The so-called rights protection is nothing more than desperate emotions.

2

The second level, the conformism

The child guided by Professor Ning Xiangdong is at this cognitive level. The child simply doesn't understand that what is in the book is not important, what matters is your knowledge and cognition.

The reason why your parents sent you abroad is not to let you study, but to make you an adult!

is to let you know universal human nature and universal social laws, and gain more valuable knowledge in the differences of different societies.

3

At the third level, recognize the limitations of rules

The most disciplined children are also the most worry-free, sensible and obedient children in school, but most of these children will encounter setbacks and failures when they enter the society.

Because these children are afraid to talk nonsense and move around just because of fear, they can't get out of fear until you know that many so-called rules are just the inertia inherited by adult society out of worry.

From here, there is a hidden dividing line between the rich and the poor. Those who are too emotional, those who stick to the old rules and those who are full of fear will all feel great pressure to survive, and they must continue to rise before they can break through.

4

The fourth level, knowing right and wrong, knowing the general idea

Learning rules, being clever and obedient, this is the requirement for young children.

In adolescence, to improve children's ability to act, it is necessary to know right and wrong, to know that some things can't be done and some things can't be said, that is, to follow the mainstream values of society, even if this value is completely wrong, but it is the only system to maintain social operation.

So this is a bloody process, trying to prove yourself to the world, but if you can't go beyond this stage, you can't break through yourself.

5

At the fifth level, people who recognize the limitations of right and wrong

At this stage, they know that human society is developing and changing, and some seemingly unbreakable golden rules will become obsolete with the development of history.

At this time, people began to think, act and accept an uncertain world.

From then on, I stopped being stubborn and obstinate. I knew that the world in everyone's eyes was different and that everyone's cognition and value system were completely different. From then on, I became gentle, didn't lose my temper, didn't get upset, and my living situation began to change.

6

At the sixth level, realize the finiteness of real resources

What is finiteness of real resources? Just like when I was a child, I divided sweet potatoes in the countryside. The number of sweet potatoes is limited. If you take one more, I will lose one here.

No matter how these sweet potatoes are distributed, it is absolutely unfair. According to the population, people with strong labor at home will not do it.

according to the contribution of labor, the poor and weak families may be starved to death. All the anger, conflict, resentment and confrontation in human society come from the lack of resources.

The most scarce thing in modern society is attention resources. Power and ability compete for scarce social attention, which brings great troubles to more people.

Here, there is an invisible survival line. People at this level are