Skills and methods of answering argumentative questions

The skills and methods of answering argumentative questions are as follows:

1, appraisal demonstration method:

Examples (including general examples)-Demonstrate examples

Quote famous sayings and make sense-make sense.

Prove a Point with Metaphor —— Metaphor Argument

Compare positive and negative facts or reasons-comparative arguments.

2, analysis and the role of the model law:

Sentence pattern: ×× argument method+argument ×× viewpoint+effect.

(1) Demonstration with examples: By citing concrete examples, the demonstration will be more concrete and convincing.

Format: Use examples to demonstrate and enumerate … (summarize examples) to prove … (if there is a sub-argument, write the sub-argument it proves, otherwise write the central argument), thus making the argument more specific and convincing.

(2) Reasoning argument: prove the argument through reasoning, making the argument more general and profound.

Form: demonstrate the viewpoint with the method of rational argument ... so as to make the argument more universal and deeper.

3. Metaphorical argument: use metaphor to prove and make the argument vivid and easy to understand.

Format: Metaphorical argument is used for comparison

④ Comparative argument: The role of comparative argument is outstanding.

Format: Compare … with … by means of comparative argument, and highlight the viewpoint of ….

⑤ Quoting arguments: The quoting arguments are complicated and related to the specific quoted materials, such as quoting famous sayings, aphorisms, authoritative data, anecdotes of celebrities, jokes and anecdotes. , its role should be analyzed in detail. For example, quoting famous sayings, aphorisms and authoritative data can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; Citing celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read.

Format: Use the argument method of quoting arguments, and quote … to prove the viewpoint of … to make the argument more convincing. (or more interesting, to stimulate readers' interest in reading)

3. The types and functions of analysis and demonstration:

Argumentation can be divided into two types: rational argument and factual argument.

There are two key points in answering questions: (1), defining the type of argument; (2) Specific analysis.

The essence of this topic is to examine the relationship between arguments, whether it is the relationship between sub-arguments and central arguments or the relationship between arguments and arguments, it is the relationship between proof and proof. Therefore, the standard answer format is as follows:

This is the argument of ... it is proving ... (argument, if there is a sub-argument, write the sub-argument it proves, otherwise write the central argument. )

Supplementary argument is very popular as a new type of question. To do this kind of topic, we should pay attention to the following two aspects: (1), and see clearly the types of arguments that need to be supplemented, that is, whether they are famous sayings or examples; (2) Pay attention to the word limit when adding celebrity cases. Of course, as an exam, you can prepare celebrity examples and famous sayings with common themes such as "diligence" and "dealing with the world". Words of famous aphorisms should be few, things should be familiar, and long famous aphorisms or unfamiliar celebrity examples should not be prepared for novelty. 20 12 reading and answering skills of argumentative papers for the senior high school entrance examination 4. The article puts forward the way of central argument:

The title of the article points out the central argument;

② Put forward the central argument at the beginning of the article;

③ At last, the article summarizes the central argument;

4. In the middle of the article, put forward the central argument with a connecting sentence.

The article does not directly put forward the central argument, but it always revolves around …

5. Determine the central argument:

Look at the title, the beginning and the end, whether it is a clear judgment, whether it is the commander-in-chief of the full text, and the point of view proved by the argument.

6. Analyze the argumentation ideas of the article.

First of all, we should understand the structure of general argumentative papers: asking questions (introduction)-analyzing questions (papers)-solving problems (conclusions).

In fact, analyzing the argumentation idea of argumentative essays is to add some words such as "first", "then", "then" and "last" on the basis of paragraph level. When you do this topic, you should pay special attention to the opening and closing sentences.

7. There is a model essay in my mind, analyze it carefully.