Is it true that Ji Xiaolan is five times a day?

Recently, there is a gossip book called "Saint Please Remove Makeup" circulating in the market. A reader of Ma Lao Liao Sao asked me a joke in the book, saying that Ji Xiaolan was crazy about himself and asked me if it was true or not. When writing this chapter on Ji Xiaolan's indulgence, this book can be said to be magnificent and natural. The author of this book is also an anecdote about Ji Xiaolan's "love" joke. Judging from his articles, he hasn't done any valuable reading, let alone textual research.

Baidu's "Ji Xiaolan's Desire" will find that the Ji Xiaolan chapter in "The Sage Please Remove Makeup" is adapted from an online joke. In online jokes, there is a more interesting saying that Ji Xiaolan has to have sex five times a day, before going to bed in the morning, once in the morning, once at noon, once in the evening and once before going to bed. In these jokes, Ji Xiaolan can eat meat, once 10 pounds, Ji Xiaolan's special function as a child is to see things at night, and so on. Jokes, as a kind of dialogue, are harmless. However, some scholars do "academic research" after processing "Duan Zi", such as Bibliography of Literature and History by Professor Zhou Jianying and Small Aspect of Great History-An Alternative Observation of Modern History of China by Shandong Writers Association.

In the first chapter of this book, Mr. Zhou Ying-Jie extracts some notes from the Qing Dynasty according to anecdotal jokes, and then draws the conclusion that Ji Xiaolan is Jiro five times a day, thus drawing a wrong conclusion-Ji Xiaolan vented his castrated soul through indulgence. The most terrible thing is that Mr. Zhou did not make any textual research on the supporting notes he listed, and directly reached the conclusion of indulgence, and then added some small materials that the politics of the old age were castrated by the Qing emperor, openly saying that ideological castration led to too much sex. This is sloppy in theory, and it is inevitable that there will be loopholes or even mistakes.

Of course, Mr. Bernard Chow's articles and the above articles are just hearsay. I can guess that the authors of those articles have not even read the supporting materials listed by them carefully, or even read them casually. Take the notes quoted in those articles as a starting point to see if they can stand scrutiny.