What was the Xia Dynasty in ancient Egypt?

The Xia Dynasty is not recognized by western historians because there is no archaeological evidence, but China people think that the Xia Dynasty exists, so we can't know the specific appearance of the Xia Dynasty at first, so we can only imagine it through the records in the history books.

A professor of the Chinese University of Science and Technology made a special study, suggesting that China did not exist in the Xia Dynasty, but in ancient Egypt. I don't quite agree with this. I didn't read the professor's papers, so I couldn't refute them one by one. From the professor's point of view expounded on the internet, there are obvious loopholes in the professor's thesis, which even non-professionals can detect. Why did the professor incline the Xia Dynasty to ancient Egypt? Do you want to extend Chinese civilization 1000? How is this so similar to South Korea's idea? Do we really have to brush the sense of existence like this? Joke! Of course, if there is conclusive evidence that Xia Dynasty was in Egypt, then Xia Dynasty did not belong to China, just as Tang Dynasty did not belong to Japan, although the Japanese inherited a lot from Tang Dynasty!

Some people think that if the Egyptians had come to China at that time, there would be evidence at the genetic level. I think this is more reliable and needs genetic screening to verify.

Why did the Xia Dynasty leave no trace? Perhaps the Xia Dynasty at that time was equivalent to a big village, and there was no mature writing. The funerary objects of emperors of past dynasties are also very simple, and in the long river of time, it is impossible to leave any traces. Maybe this trace is in a corner we don't know. In a word, no matter where our civilization originated, we have created a unique civilization after all. There is no need to be too concerned or excited about that professor's point of view. It's just an opinion.