Do you think the owner of the garden ate peaches and took him to court?

I think there is no sin. The owner of the garden sprinkled pesticides on his own fruit trees to repel insects, and did not deliberately poison people with fruit, nor did he deliberately poison people with poison. Stealing fruit is an unexpected thing for the owner of the garden.

As the owner of the orchard, he has the right to punish his willingness to transform and utilize the fruit planted in his orchard. The act of spraying pesticides is not to prevent others from stealing, but to prevent pests and diseases. Subjectively, it is the behavior of normal management of fruit trees, not intentional. On the contrary, the owner of the orchard did it on purpose, and his subjective intentional homicide and objective death constitute the crime of intentional homicide. In addition, spraying pesticides other than those prohibited by the state on fruits constitutes the crime of poisoning. Combined punishment for several crimes, the crime of poisoning is an act that seriously endangers society, and the state must severely punish it. Even if it is not accidental poisoning, more people will die because of their greed.

Although the peach thief is poisoned, it may also be caused by eating peaches sprayed with pesticides by mistake. This is obvious. It can be seen that since the thief still has reasons to appeal, it can be explained that this orchard is within the scope of pesticide use stipulated by the state, so I think the thief's claim reason is not recognized.

Since the thief has analyzed it, from the owner's point of view, since not all people use pesticides during the plant growth period in order to protect plants, how can they compensate?

Isn't this a joke? If someone claims compensation for poisoning caused by eating by mistake, it would be unkind for the victim to take responsibility for such unpredictable events.

If the law can be used at will, why do you need it? For the law, it is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties and be fair as much as possible, instead of reversing black and white and rationalizing concepts to achieve their own goals. If it is not because of human greed, how can there be cause and effect? It's not because you can't control yourself. Therefore, before reversing black and white, we must analyze our subjective motives and then advocate.