Why is it more acceptable for men to cheat than women in contemporary society?

Your question is very good, and I am happy to share my views with you. Because this is a seemingly simple but profound question, please don't take it amiss, especially those female friends. In fact, to understand this problem, just look at the marriage reality in China. The man marries the woman, and the woman goes to the man's house naked, and the man wants to buy a house for the bride price. To put it mildly, it is equivalent to a man buying a wife. Keep it after you buy it. Can you count on a woman to support your family? If a man is poor, it is not surprising that he can't find a wife. Who has ever heard that a woman can't find a husband because she is poor or lazy or can't make money? And now there are more men than women, and women are very handsome! When a man looks for a wife, he never thinks that he is poor and loves the rich, nor does he look at whether a woman will make money, as long as she is beautiful and virtuous. Smart men don't look for rich women, because rich women are too delicate to support. Let's see how women treat men. Knock on the man's house completely when you get married. Most people will pinch the man's economic lifeline after marriage, but they should keep their own private money. It's best not to spend the money they earn. Let's look at the marriage situation in western society. When a man and a woman get married, they are financially integrated or use their own money, and the expenses are basically shared equally. A man's premarital property can have nothing to do with his wife. In our traditional society, men's economic pressure and mental pressure are unmatched by women. Women don't have any financial pressure before they get married, and a man's marriage is the top priority in life. Whether a family lives well depends on a good man. If this man is just good-tempered, can't make money, and the family economic situation has not improved or even declined, then the crisis is likely to appear from the woman. Men's tolerance is beyond the understanding of women's nature. For example, men can endure poverty all their lives, but most women quit and want to rebel with your man. Does divorce hit men hard or women hard? To tell the truth, a man's divorce is like a company going bankrupt. It's hard for him to stand up again unless he is already rich and doesn't care about this woman's blackmail out of thin air. Divorce means that men have no choice but to compensate women financially. Has anyone ever heard that women compensate men financially for divorce? In fact, men can't afford to divorce, and women's divorce will not cause economic losses. This is a realistic problem. There is a cold joke that a woman can become a rich woman after several divorces in her life. A woman who is bad is rich, and a man who is rich is bad. This shows that women pay more attention to money than men. This fact reflects a serious abnormal state. The development between men and women is unbalanced, and the economic pressure on men is what women think is so-called fairness. It is understandable that women are poor, women can't make money, and women have no ideals. It is a shame that men are poor and do not struggle, so men should persevere and women should be willing to be small women. It would be great if several women were offside, capable and profitable. Such women seem to be superior to men, but men can only dream. Therefore, the leftover women are actually capable women, but they are too proud of themselves and don't want to marry. It's not that they really can't marry anyone. If women can accept that men can't earn money and are willing to raise men, will there be the possibility of leftover women? Why don't women accept economic equality with men? Now China people have a very wrong tradition of educating people, which is called "raising children in poverty and raising daughters in wealth". I know this is due to the instinct of being kind to human mothers, making men work hard and making their daughters grow up without worry. This is destined to require men to undertake the "God-given mission", and women don't seem to need to hold up half the sky. If everyone abandons those so-called old traditions, women can earn money to support their families, women can study, and men can go to women's homes without any discrimination, wouldn't our society be more harmonious and progressive? This situation is really stressful for men. In this case, a man's infidelity will not be condemned at first. A simple fact is that no matter how humble a man is, he doesn't want to ask a woman for money. He will only give her money, even if it is pitiful. Women, on the other hand, think it is natural to ask men for money. On the contrary, it is a bit shameful for men to ask women for money to live. In that case, how can men not be particularly angry when women cheat? It is like your pet. It went to someone else's house. Don't recognize you as the master, can you not be angry? The pet's position is to see who is better for it and who is more capable of taking care of it. Do you agree with its unfair position? So I want to say that this question you raised is actually not difficult, but many people dare not face it squarely, for fear of offending feminists and being accused of being flustered in the future. But I am not afraid, because telling the truth will change our society and gradually overcome the disadvantages that everyone is used to. You think this is innovative thinking, and you also said that it should be analyzed through three parts: emotion, creativity and display. In my opinion, is it necessary? Are you trying to say that men's infidelity deserves sympathy, while women's infidelity should be reviled? Can this be moved to the table? What do you want to be scolded by women? Do you still need to conduct some polls to verify whether men cheat more or women cheat more? If you give this question to a woman to answer, the result will definitely be very different from that of a man. In addition, this issue is a very sensitive one, involving social morality. I think the analysis you said to show is even more inappropriate. In fact, this question is not creative at all, but many respectable people are unwilling to answer you, or some people don't want to answer you seriously or some people don't think about it at all. And you are the first person I know to ask this question, which shows that you love to think about problems, and you are also a person who can really see problems and face them squarely or pay attention to them. That's why I didn't leave room to tell you so much for the first time. If everyone dares to think like you, that's good. So I have to answer you. As the saying goes, different people have different opinions. I am willing to continue to discuss with you! !