What kind of existence is the elephant guild?

I have worked with the Elephant Association, and I am familiar with their tonality. I define the elephant guild as the well-known version 2.0, which is characterized by greasy and bad. If it's just greasy and harmless, the point is not to hold back.

The well-known 1.0 era has passed, and the well-known 1.0 version has been abandoned and has become a street rat. No one believes that "Germany's conscience sewer, Russia's free room, Japan's summer camp croak" has become a classic joke. So many famous people began to slowly transform to version 2.0, and the Elephant Guild was one of them.

The articles of the Elephant Guild in non-political, social, ethnic and ideological fields are well hidden by the elite media, Big Tail Wolf, although it is a bit greasy. But once in these fields, it immediately becomes unbearable, both inside and outside.

Since it can be called a member of the intellectual circle, it shows that the elephant guild still has certain readability and quality, but the quality here has nothing to do with perceptual things such as opinions, morality, emotions and buttocks, but only refers to purely natural things such as originality, text structure and writing style.

The articles of the Elephant Guild give people this feeling, just like a group of middle-aged greasy men eating, drinking and having fun together. Everyone has some identities, such as headmaster, dean, director, professor, doctor, writer, musician, entrepreneur, engineer and so on. It seems that they are well-educated and gentle, and they can talk about Kan Kan's society, life, politics, economy, military affairs, education and pattern, which is logical.

There is something in the words, but it doesn't taste right. You can hear bourgeois, yin and yang, arbitrary, extreme, extreme and even wrong. It's just that these things have become "above average in quality" under the packaging of their identities, speeches, data and quotations. They seem to be a little nutritious and deep, but they are only worth seeing and not worth delving into.

Especially when he talks about the field you are familiar with, you will have no heart, and at the same time understand that he is pretending in many fields, but you are not familiar with that field and think what he said is quite reasonable.

Use an Operation Manual to explain the operation method of the Elephant Guild.

Choose a topic at random, which can be humanities and social sciences, daily encyclopedia or a controversial hot topic-point out bad habits and harms, or say a correct nonsense-and then talk about China people's thinking, habits, preferences, Confucianism, customs and cultural ethics-and after reading it, you suddenly realize, oh, it turns out that China people can't do it from the root.

One of the most important links is to use the automatic association function of human beings, which not only hides yourself well, but also gives people the feeling of discovering the new continent, and you will feel so profound and powerful. In fact, between the lines, he has used the foreshadowing and tried his best to lead you to connect these things. This is the now popular known version 2.0.