Senior two composition: About self-discipline and heteronomy, about 800 words.

Self-discipline is self-discipline. Heteronomy means accepting the constraints of others. The so-called "law" means constraint. Constraints are often called "supervision" now. Therefore, self-discipline can also be said to be the inspection and supervision of the same body or self; Heteronomy is heteronomy, that is, accepting the inspection and supervision of others.

I saw a newspaper published an article entitled "Amazing Self-discipline" and praised the "amazing self-discipline" of a "most honest policeman in the world". Here's the thing.

Nigel Bogart, who has served the British police for more than 30 years, has such a commendable honest behavior: once, he was on holiday in the picturesque Lake District of Britain, found himself driving at a speed of 33 kilometers in the speed limit zone of 30 kilometers per hour, and then gave himself a ticket for illegal driving. After arriving in the city, he immediately reported the matter to the transportation department. The judge in charge of illegal driving cases was greatly surprised. He said, "In all my years as a judge, I have never encountered such a case." As a result, the British policeman who won the reputation of "the most honest policeman in the world" was fined 25 pounds.

I think Nigel's "amazing self-discipline" is really admirable, but it is a pity that Nigel is called "the most honest policeman in the world" and his "self-discipline" has been labeled as "amazing". Is this "honesty" and "self-discipline" really rare? Even the judge in charge of illegal driving cases who accepted Nigel's report on self-examination and self-punishment was not surprised, claiming that she was "a big girl riding a sedan chair-the first time" to encounter such a miracle! Therefore, I think Nigel's "self-discipline" is admirable, but if the relevant traffic authorities in charge of illegal driving only rely on this "self-discipline" to work, I am afraid it will be "once in a thousand years" and it will be difficult to jump in a hundred years, so they have to drink northwest wind every day. Isn't it? ! And the work of banning illegal driving cases, even if it only exists in name only, "yes" means "no"

Then, I thought of the relationship between "self-discipline" and "heteronomy".

Of course, there is no doubt that our society should advocate "self-discipline" and praise the spirit of "self-discipline". "Self-discipline" belongs to the category of moral cultivation and ideological education. It is wrong to ignore ideological and moral education. But our society must not rely solely on "self-discipline". The focus of our work must not rely solely on "self-discipline". The whole human history has proved that it is not enough to rely solely on human consciousness. There must also be discipline and laws to regulate people's behavior. Discipline and law are based on the theory of "evil human nature" of ancient philosophers. Discipline and law are heteronomy, or mainly heteronomy. Heteronomy belongs to the legal category. It is absolutely impossible to establish a sound and stable legal society without heteronomy. Without heteronomy, self-discipline can never be reliably guaranteed. Ignoring or rejecting heteronomy, that is, dissident supervision, is "rule by man" There is no doubt that "rule by man" will inevitably lead to disorder and chaos in the whole society.

This reminds me of the almost annual fiscal and taxation inspection, the sacred anti-corruption struggle we have waged, and so on-have we properly handled the relationship between "self-discipline" and "heteronomy" mechanisms on these issues? This cannot but be thought-provoking. Self-discipline is the rule of virtue and heteronomy is the rule of law. The two complement each other and are indispensable.

Recently, a number of media published the public "promises" made by Jilin, Gansu, Shandong, Hebei, Ningxia, Hainan, Jiangxi, Jiangsu and other provincial committees on outstanding issues such as "red envelopes and gifts", "buying and selling officials" and "playing the banner". There were two completely different comments on the Internet, and the debate was very fierce.

Stupidly, no matter how beautiful the declaration of self-discipline, it is also empty talk in the face of huge interests.

Government officials themselves should serve the people honestly, but now they need an extra commitment procedure. Excuse me, have you reached the point where you can't do well without commitment? We have heard this promise countless times.

Half of her face is still hidden behind her guitar. Shyness is better than acting: you can't fool people with acting!

What's the use of vows? Is the traffic director of Henan still writing a bloody book? What's the use of promoting family? Who can't fake it?

As usual, the dust won't run away until the broom comes. This kind of "oath", publicity, worthless!

The key is to improve and stabilize legal supervision. Heteronomy means dissident supervision and people's supervision.

Finally, it suddenly occurred to me that an essayist talked about "secrets of the palace curtain". All Chinese emperors were short-lived, and besides death, greed for women was the fatal cause. This matter is related to both the sacred bow and the "country", so the ministers who loved the country and the DPRK at that time tried their best: whenever the eunuch knelt outside the dragon bed and heard a big noise inside, he repeatedly kowtowed to remind him of self-discipline: "Long live the dragon body!" But at this moment, the emperor's happiness comes first, and his life span and political influence have long been out of consideration, let alone other things. I understand that essayists must not just tell jokes, alas! "Self-discipline"! "Self-discipline"! The so-called self-discipline theory is weak, so be it. Self-discipline, heteronomy, rule by virtue and coexistence of France and Germany can govern the world.