Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Writing essay

1. Write an essay based on which came first, the chicken or the egg.

There is no egg without the chicken! . . .Who asks such boring questions? . .. . You have nothing to do, right? . .! ! ! Come to my house and clean the toilet! ? .

Give you material

The chicken came first

Everyone knows that chickens lay eggs, and eggs hatch chickens, so which came first, the chicken or the egg? ?

In nature, biological evolution proceeds through changes in DNA. In the case of chickens, DNA from the male sperm and DNA from the female egg meet and combine to form a fertilized egg - the first cell of the chick. This cell divides countless times to form all the cells needed for a complete organism, all of which contain the same DNA from the fertilized egg.

It can be inferred that chickens evolved from a non-chicken animal. The animal's male and female DNA undergoes some slight change when they meet, or some mutation occurs in the DNA that forms the fertilized egg. In this way, two other species of animals formed a fertilized egg with certain mutated DNA during fertilization. This fertilized egg divided countless times to form the world's first chicken.

From the above discussion, it can be seen that in the world, the chicken comes first and then the egg. Before the first fertilized egg developed into a chicken, there were no chickens on earth. 2. Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Composition

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? This is an old and difficult problem to solve.

There is a folk story about Zhuge Liang's three qi and Zhou Yu. Zhou Yu asked Zhuge Liang a difficult question: Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Zhuge Liang replied: The chicken came first. Zhou Yu sneered and said where would the eggs come from without the chicken.

Zhuge Liang asked: If the first egg was a hatching egg, where did the chicken come from? When Zhou Yu heard this, he was speechless. Qi came from the outside and blood moistened from the inside. He began to vomit blood in large mouths.

This folk tale is far-fetched, full of loopholes, and does not substantially help solve the "egg problem". Zhou Yu's question was certainly baffling.

Zhuge Liang’s rhetorical question was sophistry. But from this folk tale, we can feel how enlightened the Buddha is, how deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, and what the Three Represents are in the "Egg Fight".

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? The "Chicken First" believe that eggs are born from chickens, so the chicken came first. The "egg first" believe that chickens hatch from eggs, so the eggs come first.

This is a big logical trouble. Although eggs are born by chickens, aren’t chickens hatched from eggs? It can be said that the chicken is right when talking about the chicken, and the egg is right when talking about the egg! Both sides are trapped in a vicious cycle. It's like running in a circle and you can't tell who is in front and who is behind.

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Many masters and sages cannot answer this eternal question, but I can! Because I am much better than them... I am a complete skeptic, and the first thing I thought of about this "egg battle" was a joke. The joke is this: The driver participated in the "Certificate 6 Driving Interview" and the examiner asked the driver: If there is a person and a cat in front of you (the kind of animal that has caused an uproar in major forums recently), would you hit the person? Or hit a cat? The driver answered without hesitation: Of course it was a cat collision! The examiner said: Wrong! You should brake immediately! Brake now! This is the correct answer to the question! What the examiner gave the driver was a thinking trap! The problem is to break out of the trap! This way you have a wide range of choices.

Exactly: There are thousands of villages under the shadow of a willow and a bright flower! The problem of the "egg battle" is also here. It is difficult to verify the earliest time when this question was raised, but what is certain is the background of raising this question, which was raised in an era when science was underdeveloped.

Therefore, the first and most important thing to do is not how to answer this question, but to question the scientific nature of the question. The theory of evolution tells us that all living things are constantly evolving.

So what is a chicken and what is an egg? How to define the chicken and the egg in terms of time? Which came first, the chicken or the egg? So which year does this chicken refer to, and which year does the egg refer to? Obviously the object of the question itself is unclear! From a mathematical point of view, the only way to discuss it is: Which came first, the chicken or the egg, in 2005? Which came first, the chicken or the egg, in 2004? Which came first, the chicken or the egg, in 2003? .

And so on until the first year! And the answer isn’t necessarily the same every year.

This means that "which came first, the chicken or the egg?" will have different answers depending on the time of discussion! Of course, "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?" is mainly asked in the first year, but first, such a question does not require basic biological common sense. Secondly, the person who first raised this question does not have basic biological common sense in his brain. The so-called chicken and egg in this question are static values, not a dynamic concept! The chicken and egg here are obviously the chicken and egg of the era of the person who first asked this question.

Rather than a biological chicken and egg. The second problem with this "egg battle" is that chickens are egg-laying animals, so chickens and eggs are the same creature, not two different creatures! Under such a premise, it makes no sense to discuss which came first, the chicken or the egg.

This is like saying whether a person has a left hand or a right hand first. But where the "Egg War" really goes awry is not the above two.

"What came first, the chicken or the egg?" evolved into "What came first, the chicken or the first egg?". It has been said above that living things evolve, and the objects of discussion, chickens and eggs, are themselves ambiguous.

What is a chicken and what is an egg? Can you give a specific time? Break the casserole and ask the question: What I want is the first one and the first one, no specific time is needed. But if it’s number one, then it’s not the chicken and the egg! Taking ten thousand steps back, which came first, the first chicken or the first egg? There is a non-scientific element to this entanglement.

People who think this way regard the emergence of living things as individuals! This is absolutely anti-scientific! Modern science tells us: living things appear in populations! In other words, there is no first chicken and first egg in the world! There is only the first flock of chickens and the first flock of eggs. The so-called first chicken and first egg are entanglements without modern scientific knowledge, and they are made out of nothing after being obsessed with it! If living things appear as individuals.

First there is the first chicken, then how do chickens reproduce? There is the first egg, so how do eggs reproduce? After talking so much, let me summarize: Which came first, the chicken or the egg? This is an unscientific proposition. 2. Take one million steps back to discuss, chickens and eggs are the same organism, and organisms appear in populations.

For a certain chicken in this population, there are chickens first and then eggs, for another chicken, there are eggs first and then chickens. For the entire population, it follows a probability distribution, also That is, half of the chickens in the entire population have chickens first and then eggs, and the other half have eggs first and then chickens! In other words, for the chicken population, chickens and eggs are produced at the same time! Doubt everything, but don’t doubt your ability to doubt.

3. About science, which came first, the chicken or the egg?

[Which came first, the chicken or the egg?] Today at noon, Chen Hewen said to me: Let me ask you a high-IQ question: which came first? Which came first, the chicken or the egg? I was about to tell the answer in my heart, but suddenly I saw his smirking face, and I thought: I can't just be fooled by him! So I said this to him: Ha! If I say there is a chicken first, you will say how can a chicken come from without eggs? If I say the egg comes first, you will say where the egg comes from without the chicken, right? So I can’t say which one came first, the chicken or the egg. It seems that this is really a highly intelligent answer! Chen Hewen suddenly became dumbfounded.

However, even though Chen Hewen was fooled, which came first, the chicken or the egg? I looked online and found that everyone has different opinions and is divided into the chicken faction and the egg faction. The fierce struggle between the two factions, both reasonable and factual, made me confused.

However, I myself A set of Li's theory was formed: I am more inclined to eggs. Here's what I think: A long time ago, a bird laid a strange egg. After the egg hatched, it turned into a bird that was different from its parents. A strange bird, and then it continued to reproduce, and after many, many, many, many years, it became a chicken.

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? It is still unknown. However, I believe that in the near future, we will definitely use our own knowledge and strength to solve this somewhat nonsensical problem. 4. Write an essay on which came first, the chicken or the egg

There are no eggs without chickens! .

Who asked such boring questions? .

You have nothing to do, right? .

! ! ! Come to my house and clean the toilet! ? .

Here is the material for you: The chicken came first. Everyone knows that chickens lay eggs, and eggs hatch chickens. So, which came first, the chicken or the egg? In nature, biological evolution proceeds through changes in DNA.

Taking chicken as an example, DNA from the male egg and DNA from the female egg meet and combine to form a fertilized egg - the first cell of the chick. This cell divides countless times to form all the cells needed for a complete organism, all of which contain the same DNA from the fertilized egg.

It can be inferred that chickens evolved from a non-chicken animal. The animal's male and female DNAs undergo some slight change when they meet, or some mutations occur in the DNA that forms the fertilized egg.

In this way, two other species of animals formed a fertilized egg with certain mutated DNA during fertilization. This fertilized egg divided countless times to form the world's first chicken. From the above discussion, it can be seen that in the world, the chicken comes first and then the egg.

Before the first fertilized egg developed into a chicken, there were no chickens on earth. 5. Which came first, the chicken or the egg? 500-word essay

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? This is the question posed by a sophist. No one can tell the answer to this question. Because everyone can express their own opinions. If there was a chicken first, how did the chicken come about? It is hatched from an egg; if there is an egg first, how did the egg come from? It was born from a chicken.

In fact, the sophists secretly changed the reference object. Let’s use an analogy: Is the earth large or small? If it's big, isn't it small compared to the sun? If it's small, isn't it huge compared to the moon? So the reference objects are different, and the answers to the questions are also different. As long as the reference is fixed, the answer is fixed.

In life, this kind of sophistry is also very "useful". If there are benefits, then everyone will rush to take over the matter; if something goes wrong, then everyone will rush to shirk responsibility. Commonly known as "kicking the ball". We don't want *** people who "kick the ball". 6. Which came first, the chicken or the egg (argumentative essay)

What do you want to say about the general laws of things? Or is it a simple question of the origin of life? If we talk about the general rules of things, then the egg is the cause and the chicken is the result.

But there are reasons for the emergence of reasons. The "eggs" of this generation are completely different from the previous generation, so they are endless.

If it were just a question of the origin of life, then it would be this: this chicken and egg question, if we follow the map of biological evolution, we will find that we are actually asking whether proteins or nucleic acids were produced first? The protein is the chicken, and the nucleic acid is the egg.

This issue is still debated in academic circles, because no one lacks enough evidence to prove the environment and conditions 4 billion years ago. I personally believe that the emergence of life is very accidental. If the theory of evolution is correct, life evolved from the most basic nucleic acids and proteins. Perhaps proteins should have come first, and then proteins gave birth to nucleic acids.

"Which came first, the chicken or the egg?" When people ask this question, we must first understand what kind of answer the questioner is expecting. When someone asks you, "Which came first, the United States or the United Kingdom?" a simple "Which came first, the United Kingdom" will suffice, with at most a few explanations of history.

Obviously, the chicken-and-egg question does not require this kind of answer. No matter whether you answer the chicken or the egg, it must be far from the answer that is really expected. Otherwise, the first dozen or so of the article One word is enough. Because here the questioner has already assumed that any straightforward answer seems to be equally reasonable, or equally unreasonable.

In this case, he still wants to ask. If he has not concluded that there is no answer to this question and deliberately makes things difficult, he just wants to know which answer is more reasonable and wants you to help him solve the problem in his heart. Mystery. Therefore, what I want you to clarify here is "Why did the chicken come first" or "Why did the egg come first", rather than straightforwardly "Why did the chicken come first" or "Why did the egg come first".

So how do we answer the "why" here? First, we need to clarify any ambiguities that may be hidden in the question itself. "Chicken" can refer to all chickens, or it can refer to a specific chicken, and "egg" can refer to all eggs, or it can refer to a specific egg.

If the "chicken" in the question refers to all chickens and the "egg" refers to all eggs, obviously we cannot find the answer, because some chickens come before some eggs, and some chickens come after other chickens. Some more eggs. If the "chicken" and "egg" in the question refer to a certain "chicken" and a certain "egg", then which one comes first and which one comes last cannot be known by thinking and reasoning alone, but requires us to Conduct empirical research to find out which chicken was hatched at what time on which day, and which egg was laid on which day.

If you think that the chicken already exists in the eggshell and the egg already exists in the hen's body, the problem will be more complicated, but in principle, such problems can only be dealt with on a case-by-case basis, and we cannot give you a solution. Come up with a general answer to which comes first. In fact, the above are all beside the point.

If we think about it for a moment, we will know that the "chicken" and "egg" in the question refer to the "first chicken" and "the first egg". Therefore, a more complete statement of the question is: "Which came first, the first chicken or the first egg? If there is an answer, what is the basis for the answer?" Now, the meaning of the word "first" determines the entire question The nature of , if it refers to temporal sequence, is a matter of fact; if it refers to logical sequence, it is a conceptual issue.

For example, you asked me which came first, the car or the car wheel. My answer is that in fact, the car wheel came first and then the car, because in terms of time order, if the car wheel is not completed first, it will be complete. cars can't be made. But conceptually, there is the car first, and then there are the wheels.

Because logically, only by first understanding what a car is can we understand what a car wheel is. So in the chicken-and-egg question, are we asking a factual question or a conceptual question? If you understand it as a matter of fact, then as long as you imagine that your life span is very long, from ancient times when there were no eggs or chickens to today, and you have no problem with your memory, and you continue to observe the relevant processes, it seems that you can understand it clearly. That’s a perfect answer to this question, isn’t it? In fact, the problem is much more complicated. If we think about it carefully, we will find that there are many problems with this idea.

There are only two possibilities for the process of chickens and eggs coming from scratch. One possibility is that, as the theory of evolution says, animals evolved from lower organisms. Such evolution can be slow and gradual, or it can be mutation.

The second possibility is direct creation, that is, before the first chicken or the first egg appeared, there was no intermediate state from the non-biological state that led to its appearance.

Let's first discuss the gradual process of evolution and see how it goes.

Because it is gradual, you will not see any obvious signs of species evolution between any one day and the next day. In this case, no matter how long you live, if you have lived since ancient times when there were no chickens and no eggs, will you be able to know which came first, the chicken or the egg? That's not necessarily the case.

Think about it, because when there were no chickens and eggs, you had not had the opportunity to form the concept of what a chicken and an egg were. In this case, even if you observe the entire process of evolution non-stop, it is impossible for you to suddenly conclude that the first chicken or the first egg appeared at a certain moment on a certain day, so this idea of ??on-the-spot judgment It won't work.

Then, we can think differently. According to today’s definitions of chickens and eggs or a set of necessary and sufficient conditions to determine what is a chicken and what is an egg, imagine whether eggs or chickens appeared first during the evolutionary process.

In fact, only this kind of thinking can be feasible, because there was no definition of eggs at that time, and the definition can only be taken as it is today. In other words, we need to use today’s concepts to understand things in the past.

So, how should we define eggs and chickens today, or what standard of discrimination should we use to be the most natural and reasonable? The definition may be complicated, but the egg must grow in the body of the chicken. Today, if a hen lays something that is otherwise like an egg but without a yolk, we can still call it an egg, but if a scientist creates something indistinguishable from an egg in the laboratory, we can also call it an egg. Refuse to call it an egg.

It seems that, according to this definition of nature, there are no eggs without chickens. In contrast, chicken. 7. College entrance examination composition materials: The teacher asked the students which came first, the chicken or the egg. One student answered which came first

Which came first, the chicken or the egg

"Which came first, the chicken or the egg?" The question "which came first, the egg" is a question that people have been debating for a long time and there is no clear answer. In fact, eggs appeared much earlier than chickens, because reptiles appeared as early as 280 million years ago in the Permian, and reptiles (such as crocodiles, dinosaurs, etc.) all lay eggs, and birds Human beings appeared in the Jurassic period 180 million years ago, and chickens appeared even later. But the question of "Which came first, the chicken or the egg" actually asks the question of who came first, the chicken or the egg.

Chickens lay eggs, and eggs hatch chickens. If you say that chickens came first, then "how can a chicken hatch without laying eggs?" If you say that the egg appeared first, you will encounter the problem of "who laid the egg if there is no chicken", which is really confusing.

According to the theory of evolution, there is no question of who comes first between chickens and eggs. As a species in the class Birds, chickens are differentiated from primitive birds, and eggs are the fertilized eggs of chickens (referring to eggs that can breed chicks). In the long process of the formation of the chicken species, it has always been the connection The bridge between one generation in the evolution of the "original bird - the chicken". In the formation process of chickens, there are three factors: mutation, heredity, and natural selection. "Chickens" lay eggs (which could not be called chickens in the more primitive days), and eggs lay "chickens". The two generations are not exactly the same, and there are always differences between the offspring of the same parent. A "chicken" can lay many eggs, but not all eggs will eventually become adult chickens. In the struggle for survival, individuals with favorable mutations have the best chance to preserve themselves, and the advantages and disadvantages are determined by nature. The formation of chickens is precisely because nature gradually retained their good running skills. They are differentiated from primitive birds due to their mutated characteristics such as more ground activities and poor flying ability. Obviously, heredity plays a role in maintaining and consolidating variation, and it accumulates variation through heredity.

After a long process of "chicken" to egg, egg to "chicken" from generation to generation, under the action of natural selection, the variation of species is accumulated directionally, resulting in the differentiation and new species of species. In the formation of species, "chickens" slowly evolved, and eggs also evolved. This is a process that lasts millions of years. We must not hard-code the emergence of "chickens" and "eggs"~