A movie "Dictator" that attracts American hatred crazily, how does man control his own destiny?

Many people label The Dictator as "appealing to both refined and popular tastes", but in my mind, The Dictator is a vulgar film, not elegant, and its final sublimation is more similar to the extreme rebound of vulgarity.

We can look at this movie from two angles, pure comedy or senior black.

Pure comedy perspective: vulgar, spoof, and even a little messy, but laughter is indeed frequent, and it is enough to laugh from beginning to end. Won't make you cry and think deeply. Only the absurd plot and logic will be carried out to the end, with no moral integrity and no lower limit.

Director Larry Charles is a great master in the field of absurd comedy. This time, "The Dictator", he played more hi, more absurd.

From the perspective of senior black, it has 20% connotation.

Surface: bearded shape, a country in the hinterland of the Middle East, you don't have to say who you are hacking. Of course, except a country in the Middle East, all the other third world countries, including China, are also plagued by blackie. Of course, it is harmless.

Neri: The last speech was directed at the largest democracy in the world. It is a model of arrogance, but everything it says makes sense and hits my heart.

Theoretically, it is really an anomaly that this film can be released. Or the judges are all blind, or they are really more open than us in a certain way.

Of course, no matter from which angle, the core point around it is the protagonist in the play: bin Laden.

Born with a golden key

Compared with him, the rich second generation defined by us in the secular world is really weak. Aladdin was the king of a country and lived in a magnificent palace. He can do whatever he wants, decide his own life and death at will, and change national policies at will.

That nonsense sprint race is the epitome of his whole chaotic, luxurious and luxurious life.

In the face of great changes, life has reached a corner.

On a normal overseas visit, Aladdin was given a "civet cat for a prince" by his "brother" and No.2 at home, and Aladdin became a redundant person. He faced the abandonment of the whole country and the pursuit arranged by his brothers.

In a panic, he walked into a supermarket, and it was here that he met the heroine Zoe.

Of course, don't mistake this for a turning point, because Aladdin will dig out his inner goodness and then become a wise king and so on.

Ellaton is still "nonsense" and "extremely arrogant".

Tear up the agreement and continue dictatorship.

After some inexplicable revenge, Aladdin returned to his position and faced the democracy that everyone expected! He arbitrarily tore up the agreement and declared that he would carry the dictatorship to the end.

The last speech was based on Chaplin's The Great Dictator, but with different styles and the same connotation.

All its contradictions are directed at the United States: "democracy, long armpit hair, a little overweight, the poor are getting poorer and the rich are getting richer, but after the rich lose all their property, they want the poor to pay the bill."

Aladdin will continue his dictatorship, but after walking around outside, it seems that his dictatorship has become so humanized. He is still arrogant, but he is no longer unreasonable. He still looks up to the world, but he is no longer just self-centered.

Aladdin is a character in the movie. He is arrogant, dead steel and selfish. In reality, the role of bin Laden naturally does not exist, but there is a similar system in his character. It represents the epitome of people's understanding of imperialism, and the final change represents the sublimation that people yearn for. Even if the system remains unchanged, can it become so human?

Compare the country with the film, compare the system with Ellaton, and use his grandiose personality to vomit the decay of the system. All its resistance is the voice of the people. This is The Dictator. It's vulgar, but it's good-looking.