What questions can be asked before marriage to refute the other party in the debate?

It's easier to get married than to support a family. Without a certain economy, this is not home, but a group of "people" who are anxious about tomorrow's life, or they don't look like people anymore.

1 At present, most young people have no economic basis for getting married. If they get married first, how can they bear the huge wedding expenses?

Until you have a stable job, your future is uncertain, and so is your work place. If you find a position that suits you very well after marriage, but it is far from your home, how do you choose? Let the other person answer this question first, find loopholes in his answer and refute it.

If the other party puts forward the word "marriage", it can be said that it is a marriage mode determined by ancient economic conditions, and marriage is naturally not a problem. But now many people have to leave their homes to develop in big cities, and it is difficult for family assets to meet the current marriage standards. Therefore, the word "marriage" is no longer suitable for the current situation, and we must keep pace with the times.

There is another advantage of putting career before family, that is, marrying late and having children late, which is beyond doubt in response to the call of the state.

If there is no suitable partner for the time being, there is another advantage of getting married first, that is, starting a career first, getting in touch with a higher level of the opposite sex, and having a wider range of choices is conducive to improving the quality of life in the future. Is there such an opportunity to get married before starting a career?