The Warriors have a poor record this season. Is Curry really a system player?

With Curry's recent outbreak, he scored 62 points and was successfully elected as the best of the week in the next three quarters. Suddenly, the heat rose. It seems that the warriors who were generally looked down upon before have re-entered the line of sight of censorship; When the Warriors began to suffer a series of fiasco, Curry was also sprayed as a system player. Without Durant, Thompson and Green, he is nothing, but as the Warriors' record begins to pick up, this issue should be reconsidered. First of all, Curry is definitely not a system player. The name given by the outside world to the system players is obviously to look down on Curry; Since Curry was born in the league, he has successfully led the era of small ball, especially after Durant joined in to form "universal courage" and became the public enemy of the whole people. The decline of the Warriors this season can be said to be an embarrassing attitude.

Systematic players can be understood as functional players with weak ability to hold the ball and attack independently. Generally speaking, they are good at fixed-point shooting and free cutting. Such players are not strong in their own ability, but as long as they are in the right system, they often give people the performance of a strong star player. The most typical example is that cappella's attack is relatively simple and he didn't make a move, but his pick-and-roll with Harden was fed to the cake king alive. 18 In the first round of the playoffs, the Rockets played against Timberwolves cappella, suppressing Timberwolves' star center Downs and helping the Rockets beat Timberwolves 4- 1 to eliminate Timberwolves.

The biggest feature of system players is that they have strong offensive ability with the ball and can attract pressure to help their own players play better. To establish a system of your own, you only need to give a well-equipped role team, without any carefully planned tactics, and you can win the game or even enter the finals to compete for the championship by relying entirely on your own system to control the players. The most famous player who has his own system is James. No matter what kind of player he is, he can make a name for himself. Neither JR Smith of the Cavaliers nor Morris and caruso of the Lakers can fully tap their potential. In 2007, the "Seven Chivalrous Jedi" who led such a knight without a second core into the finals, the finals in 15, and the ultimate form "Thanos War" in 18 all led a group of poor teams to kill the quartet.

After giving two definitions, we can also conclude that Curry is not a systematic player. Although his offensive ability without the ball is very strong, his offensive ability with the ball is also very strong. Cole's passing system really boosted the strength of the Warriors, but even in cooperation with Durant, Curry was a combination of no ball and ball, and there was a scene of ball attack. Curry is also a player with his own system. Curry and Green occupy the core position in Cole's championship system. Without the system of Curry, it will not be realized.

So Curry is a veritable superstar, but his own system ability value is not as good as James's, and he can't maintain strong competitiveness without enough team configuration. In addition, his physical endurance is not good, and he also has an ankle injury. Last season, there were hidden dangers in hand bones and lack of endurance, which led to being despised by the outside world. The ability to express self-contained system by numerical value: James can be regarded as 80: 20; Curry is 60:40, which is also considered as the adaptability without ball under the prescribed system.