What is the attitude of English knights towards their longbowmen opponents?

I must say it depends on the knights and archers.

Medieval people, like today, knew their peers, but they often interacted with people with lower or higher status than themselves. Earls with dozens of manors are absent landlords most of the time, but knights with four manors know yeomen and their families. From the social point of view, squire archers and soldiers in gentlemen's magazines fight side by side, and from the salary point of view, the salary of ordinary soldiers is twice that of archers on horseback, which also shows this point.

Others are called yeomen, not because they are rich farmers, but because they are servants of knights or gentlemen's families. There are also some nobles who are too poor to buy horses and armor, so they join the army as archers, their older brothers as guards and their younger brothers as archers.

For example, thomas de Ashton directly signed a contract with Henry IV to provide an infantry and an archer for the 1400 expedition to Scotland. Thomas is an infantryman, and his relative John de Ashton is an archer. There is also the example of John Abby, who was an archer during the expedition to France in 144 1. Two years later, John signed another contract to explore France, this time as an armed man, taking his relative Richard Abby as an archer.

Obviously, many soldiers, some of them knights, must know the archers they brought; Maybe relatives, family members or lords.

I can't imagine their attitude, but I think their attitude is personal first and has little to do with work. I can imagine that some yeomen keep close relations with several generations of nobles, their grandfathers may know each other, and perhaps their children.

There may be some friendly competition and spoof jokes between certified public accountants and tax agents, but on the whole, I think the latter's attitude towards the former depends largely on the individual rather than his work.