Is it anti-science to question authoritative scientists? what do you think?

From this perspective, what the subject wants to say is not aimed at scientists themselves, but at their theories. So it is against science to question authoritative scientists? I can tell you for sure, no!

Authoritative scientists are often people who have the absolute right to speak in a certain field, and they have made great contributions in this field and are outstanding scientists. The words of scientific authority are not necessarily absolutely correct, but they are more likely to be correct. Science tells us to have the spirit of questioning, so of course we can question him.

Before that, we must understand what is questioning. Questioning is not a wild guess, it should be justified and not turn into a personal attack. Questioning scientific theory has nothing to do with people. Asking questions is a very cautious thing, and every tiny detail should not be ignored. It is shameful to question others at will and slander and criticize others because you don't know them. It is brave to be ashamed and backward.

Before questioning other people's theories, you should first reflect on yourself and see if you are really fully sure, otherwise don't say it easily, or it will easily make a joke. The words of authoritative scientists are generally more credible than those of ordinary people. Usually we choose to trust experts, which is why. The real scientific attitude is to choose to believe the evidence.

There are many anti-intelligence and anti-science people on the Internet who question the achievements of scientists under the banner of science. They are called "people's subjects" and have made many jokes. They questioned the two scientific pillars of quantum mechanics and relativity, and put forward some theories full of loopholes and logical errors. They claimed to have discovered a new scientific theory, but they couldn't produce any reliable evidence. Only one mouth, I was right. Others firmly believe in some theories that have long been proved wrong by the scientific community. Some people are influenced by feudal superstitions and put forward various pseudo-scientific theories just for theological metaphysics.

As everyone knows, these scientific theories have been verified by numerous experiments, and modern human civilization is based on them and opposes science with scientific and technological achievements. For such people who have no basic scientific knowledge, but want to make great achievements in the field of science, we are called scientific paranoia.

The above are purely personal opinions, and you are welcome to express your opinions. Your praise is my greatest support.