Joke Collection Website - Cold jokes - A joke about mine clearance

A joke about mine clearance

With the continuous development of military technology, modern technology has begun to gradually replace labor in any aspect. As a result, the social unemployment rate rose and most people began to be laid off. However, it is puzzling that workers who worked hard began to be laid off. Why do demining officers and soldiers who have been going to the front line still risk their lives to demine in some dangerous areas?

I believe most people should be curious about this question. After all, I believe that anyone who loves peace will hope that demining officers and soldiers will be unemployed from now on. To this end, we might as well talk about it today, why demining needs manpower and machines can't replace it? For this problem, the author is divided into several parts to explain for everyone.

The first point: from the current level of military technology, mine clearance can be replaced by science and technology in many cases, but it cannot be completely replaced. What's going on here? We know that at present, when the army discovers or analyzes bombs, it usually uses robots instead of people for close observation. Similarly, demining robots can be replaced, but the related technology of robots has not developed as efficiently as we thought. As a result, many times a mine can be easily dismantled by hand, but it needs to be dismantled by robot, which is risky and costly and will only slow down the efficiency of demining.

The second point: in the eyes of many people, it may be said that the army and soldiers do not need robots to dismantle bombs in order to save costs and speed up efficiency. But in fact, there are many things behind this that people don't understand. Anyone who has seen film and television plays knows that many times a mine explodes, which is likely to cause other mines to explode. In other words, even using robots to detonate mines is not 100% safe. At this time, it will not only increase the cost of demining, but also increase the injury of soldiers around.

The third point: Why not carpet bomb the minefield? Believe this, many people will think that, after all, mines were blown to pieces. As long as one explosion, the others will also explode. Isn't it ok to cover a minefield at this time? Actually, we were all wrong. You know, mines will either explode from the soil by covering the minefield, and then there will be mines in this area from now on.

Manual mine clearance is the crux of the problem. In the early days, in many border areas, our army and the two armies would choose to bury mines in the soil to prevent the enemy from invading, because this is the most effective way to stop the enemy and cause great harm to the enemy. At that time, as long as a minefield was found, soldiers would choose to take a detour without taking too much risk.

Over time, with the passage of time, some mines will be buried deep underground, some will fall out of the surface, and some will explode at any time like untimely bombs. In this way, the minefield environment is complex, and no one can guarantee that all mines will be detonated after covering and bombing the minefield. Nowadays, with the rapid growth of population, many barren land will be developed. At this time, mines that have been neglected for many years will greatly threaten our own security. So there is no choice but to arrange soldiers to demine manually. Finally, I can only silently wish the officers and men who serve the people in the front line safe and healthy.