Now HR is a recruitment machine, both young and inexperienced, and I can't wait for it. I hope they have a vision? It's just a joke.

As a second-level human resources teacher with ten years' working experience, I have to admit that this topic is very reasonable and the words are not rough. Let a 25-year-old recruiter who has worked for two years interview 40-year-old industry bosses and corporate executives, just like making people dizzy. How can we make a pertinent evaluation?

Therefore, the interviewer's industry experience, workplace accumulation and even life experience are sometimes more important than professional skills. As the entrance of a company's human resources, is recruitment far from pulling pigs? Just circle people like that. A grain of mouse excrement may ruin the company's good porridge. This is why I have always said that the salary budget of human resources and financial positions is higher than the median of the same level within the enterprise.

Unfortunately, most small and micro companies in traditional industries are not aware of this problem. A recruiter earns 3000 yuan. How can you expect him to bring you a big cow that can create tens of millions of benefits? Most companies' understanding of human resources still stays at the level of transaction operation.

Don't be angry, such a company is not worth going to. You can find a good company in the industry top 10. The recruitment process and level of such companies are generally online. Even if the interviewer's ability is limited, a reliable quality model score table will not make the evaluation results deviate too much. Basically, it is still possible to make a pertinent evaluation of candidates.

Above, I hope the interview of Miss Sister goes smoothly. If it helps, please adopt it. I hope you don't hesitate to praise me and let me continue to export high-quality content. From Q users: Pear Flower and Tiger

This is very interesting. In your eyes, HR is only responsible for recruiting six modules of human resources. Did you eat the rest? Moreover, HR recruits people, and most of the interview and employment rights are in the department head or general manager. Is it useful that we have discernment? At most, when we communicate with the manager, we say that you are better, but the decision is still up to the manager, cynicism HR? Is it interesting? From Q user: Vn399 12688dv.