Is it legal for many rural people to sell farmland to others to build houses?

The couple pulled the car uphill and the car slipped halfway up the slope. The wife scolded her husband for not using force, and the husband suspected that his wife used less force. Whose problem is it? The teacher concluded: I said that neither of you tried hard.

When the teacher tells this joke, the original intention is that teachers and students must work together to get their studies up. Looking back from this angle, it is quite interesting.

Rural people want to sell land, but no one buys it. Pure wishful thinking. Some people want to buy land, but rural people don't sell it. It's also about shaving your head-hot heads. If this illegal thing is realized, who is more responsible? In the teacher's words, I said neither TM is right.

Whose fault is bigger? It takes two hands to make a sound, and both sides must be at fault. If you have to decide a size, it depends on which angle you look at it.

The contracted land in rural areas is good, which may be tasteless for some reasons, just like chicken ribs. It's a pity to abandon it. Although there may be the idea of selling or transferring, there are regulations there and no one buys them. Just an idea. The reason why it can be sold is because some people want to buy land and build houses in the countryside, so they hit it off and achieved good things.

On the other hand, it is good for land buyers to stay in the city, but in the case that rural land is becoming more and more "fragrant", they hope to expand their territory and can't afford it in the city, or they want to be close to nature and use their spare money to buy a piece of land to build a house, but it is stipulated that no one sells land there. How can they buy rural land to build a house?

Therefore, if we have to divide the weight, we should deal with it like two naughty students fighting, find out the classroom together, reflect on it in the sunshine at the door of the classroom, hit 50 boards each, find out what's going on, copy each other's papers and check them, and then go back to the classroom to be a good student again.

In-depth analysis of the matter of buying land and building houses in rural areas actually hides three facts.

On the one hand, the booming real estate industry has left many people at a loss and found a new way out. It has planted seeds, rooted roots and grown grass in the hearts of buyers; And some "idle people" who have old-age security, spare money and don't worry about eating and drinking pay more and more attention to the quality of life and want to go into nature, so they turn their attention to rural land. This book is understandable, but it reflects the abnormal psychology under the abnormal ecology.

Both, with the acceleration of urbanization, urban land is becoming more and more scarce and land resources are becoming more and more tense, so some people secretly aim at rural cultivated land, but many farmers are still in ignorance. Some people are bent on urban life and don't understand the preciousness of the land in their hands. They have become an "egg" with "cracks", just in line with some people's ideas, so there is the matter of buying and selling houses by contract.

Among the three, with the background of economic development, there is a shocking difference between rural land output and farmers' income, so there is such a "cracked" "egg".

To solve this problem, we need to judge who is right and who is wrong, but we still need to solve it from the source and must solve it as soon as possible.

The so-called land circulation, its essence is to transfer land to people who have the ability to plant, optimize the industrial structure, and the ultimate goal is to improve the output of land. Then we might as well look at this problem from a big perspective. First, break the barriers between urban and rural areas, break the boundaries between agriculture and non-agriculture, truly liberate the land, and rearrange the pattern of "land to the tiller" on the premise that all citizens enjoy the development dividend. This should be a new "agrarian revolution" under the new situation.

So where are the farmers going? Where do city people go?

This involves the "housing level". To be clear, there are not tens of thousands of words and deeds, and we have the opportunity to talk about it in depth. However, the new land management law has undergone new changes. In the past, rural land had to be nationalized before it was used. It's not necessary now. Under the supervision of the relevant state departments, it can be directly handed over to the collective. On this premise, rural areas,

Friends in the city want to get a house in the countryside in the future. They don't need to buy land for construction. They just need to rent a small courtyard in the countryside. Farmers don't have to risk illegal land sales to build houses and collect rent every month. The problem that the subject said rarely appeared will no longer be a problem in the future.

Why distinguish right from wrong again?