Comments on TV series Blade 1937

If the teacher hadn't recommended me twice, I might have missed this stirring TV series Blade 1937, and I wouldn't have so many feelings. I wrote these words.

I only watch movies all the time, mainly because I don't have enough time. It's easier to watch movies. But after watching this TV series, I found that I like movies and TV, as long as they are good movies. This doesn't make sense. Someone will laugh at me for putting this on the table. Because the film pays attention to timeliness, it tells the story of a person in a period of time, and this story is rare in this film, and most of the time it is paving the way. This narrative satisfied my pleasure and desire-fragmented, direct, messy and, of course, soon forgotten. But after watching this drama, I found the benefits of TV drama. Just like reading a novel. From beginning to end, I experienced someone else's life in a few days. We enter the play, experience and feel everyone's inner ups and downs, love and hate life and death. We often say that life is like a play and society is a big stage. Everyone plays a different role and has his own ideas, but everyone is doing one thing-making himself "better" alive. I saw a post saying that the light and sound waves stimulated by psychology in film and television works are not a reflection of what is being performed directly at the moment, but an experience of appealing to the audience's memory reserve. There is a Japanese movie "My Robot Girlfriend", which is about a person who experiences other people's lives by implanting a memory chip of a robot. Briefly talk about my blade's "experience in memory".

Before watching Blade, I watched a TV series "Latency", a movie "Out of Reach" and a book called "Father's War". Originally, any work can make me write a lot of things, but I can't. One is because I am lazy, and the other is because I think I have a lot to say, but I don't know how to say it, because my experience is too similar to theirs, and I can't tell the difference between drama and drama. But this time, when I was in a frenzy, I wrote wherever I wanted.

I have a habit. After watching a good work, I will quietly listen to the ending song until the end of the play and watch the lens combination at the end. Because it not only helps me to sort out the plot, but also is an interpretation of the people in the play. Through several shots, I feel their dramatic life, and experience the emotions conveyed by the director and the sigh of life fate. In the end, the play ended with national justice. Thousands of China people in Qian Qian are being attacked by the Japanese, while Zheng Shusen and Pound have gone up in smoke. I don't think the righteousness of a nation can cover up a hero's life, which is one-sided. He can express this level, but he can't simply handle it. I can't judge whether Pound finally killed the Japanese for revenge or for his "idea" like Zheng Shusen, but when there were only two "people" left on the whole beach, what they said and did in the church could not be explained by national justice.

What I like best is the narrative style of this play. Often, the lines and dialogues are very long, and they are parallel narratives. Two or three lines are carried out at the same time, and the behavior is the same. I think of the dialogue in the Peach Blossom Garden, which is very classic and still wanting more. Everyone's face can be presented in this way, some people cry, some people laugh, some people simply live, and some people suffer. And this way has also broken another traditional understanding of mine: books are definitely better than film and television shooting. I want to say that without good actors, you naturally can't play that meaning.

I have a question, why can a person as small as Zheng Shusen kill people and go to the point of no return? There are reasons for Pound, their own reasons and the reasons of the times. Recently, I often hear a word called the tragedy of the times. Later, I learned that everyone is the product of his time. Forced by the times, the times also gave him opportunities. Some people get rich first, and some people are beggars all their lives. In the whole era, the whole society is a machine, everyone is the same, but different people meet different circles, so in the end everyone is unique. Thinking about modernity, modern society is a step-by-step machine. No matter where something goes wrong, there will be corresponding tools to fix it. This is also mechanization. I also think of a game called Red Alert. This is how the war was born. The machine is broken, there are tools, but there is no money and no harvesters. Everyone is a part. If the old one is broken, there will be a new one. ) So Zheng Shusen was deceived by his time and stood up and rebelled. Not necessarily smooth people will suffer more, some people will change slowly, and some people will remain unchanged after being scarred. Pound said that Zheng Shusen was like this, and there was a fuse in itself, which could not be removed as long as it was lit. So he is his own tragedy. In TV series, every protagonist has a wish-to live simply, and his wife and children are hot, but they are also puzzled. What power makes them go against their hearts, from fear to dullness to madness or even numbness, and make themselves do things they didn't want to do, dare to do or won't do, and become more and more skilled? In addition to the factors of the times, there is also human nature. Of course, I have heard from many people recently, as if this is the root of all problems. Of course, I understand this absurdity. People's nature is not profound and can't solve any practical problems. I want to say that the beginning of life is inherently evil. Although some people look at the world with a kind heart, the environment remains unchanged, and this characteristic of people remains unchanged. Zheng Shusen changed from a person to a ghost, and then to a person, but this process is always accompanied by murder. Do you think he is getting better or worse? It's just that his interpretation of this has changed, from being a person to being a group of people. Before protecting himself, he protected others, but only a few of these people are real, and the rest are nothingness. We call it faith. I think a person will not change from a bad person to a good person as long as his beliefs change. For some nihilists, the concept of nothingness is unrealistic to live. Therefore, Zheng Shusen is his own tragedy, and he embarked on this road himself, although he may feel very happy, fighting for his ideals and dedicating himself. Thinking of the book "Father's War" is also about how a person who has nothing to do with another thing has been changed. These two works are very similar, not the plot, but the connotation. Both of them have asked this question. Where is this invisible force? How did they step by step toward the other side of fate? The times chose them, and the human struggle dragged them to the abyss. The reason why Zheng Shusen can develop so fast is to take advantage of this characteristic of people-lack of knowledge-to challenge the original survival law of people, which is worrying. In a noisy stage, people who break the tradition are successful, provided that their selfishness is solved.

Another puzzle is why Zheng Shusen became best friends with such a group of people and really regarded them as brothers until his death. Just like a blind man, a stammer, a beggar, a scholar, a woman, a small white face, a group of people who have never touched a gun before and can't even write a fight, will follow him in the Jianghu? Do they have ideals? Yes, I think we should live for a bite like Zheng Shusen, but are they just fighting for a brother? I know it's a matter outside the play, and this one won't come up with any great truth, but I still don't understand how a group of cowards like him have become so unreasonable.

Zheng Shusen is a tragedy, and Pound is a tragedy. He created a self to destroy others, but almost destroyed himself, leaving only himself. He directed the first half of the play and the second half was directed by the Japanese. Pound said that there are three kinds of people on the beach: Zhonghetang people, Pound people and others; Zheng Shusen also said that there are three kinds of people on the beach: Zhonghetang people, Pound people and Zheng Shusen people. At that time, their eyes were all rivers and lakes, only revenge and despair, but they also forgot the times and society. No one will dominate their own lives, they can choose, but they can't resist. For the record, I believe in fate. I think different people have different paths, and everyone has a certain fate. Whether you know it early or late, you have to go through it. All we have to do is try our best to do what we think is right. Neither of them believes in fate, but in the end, we have to say that this is their fate. I think the most understandable person in the play is Jojo. She accepted her fate, but more importantly, she tried to do what fate arranged for her to do. All Jianghu people love and hate each other. Everyone says this is Jianghu, but no one knows what Jianghu is like. No matter how big it is, it is also a river's lake, so the river's lake is the people's heart in the final analysis, with intrigue, suspicion and intrigue. Unless you are really smart, you have no feelings, but people who can do this in the Jianghu often lament that they were born at the wrong time, but in the blink of an eye, they began to kill and steal goods. The soul is just something that others laugh at. There is a line in the play that there is a place in the world called church, which is a place to repent for the soul; There is another place in the world called prison, which is a place to punish the body. One is the power of faith, and the other is the secular power; One is voluntary and the other is compulsory, but the result is the same, which makes people introspect, make people understand their sins and make him (her) pay the mental or physical price.

I don't know what to say after writing so much. I just want to remember four words after sleeping all night. I want to write about their fate, their experiences and their values, but I don't want to explore the roots or criticize them. This is the first text I typed on the computer. Because I am not familiar with five strokes, my thoughts are intermittent and I don't know what touches me the most. I feel sad for Zheng Shusen's absurd fate, and also for Pound's self-deception life, and I feel more deeply about the intellectual life of Jojo intellectuals. It can be said that everyone in the play is a tragedy, and they attribute all the reasons to the Japanese. Considering this, it can be said that their tragedy has long been doomed. Even without Zheng Shusen and Pound, others will follow this path because of the continuation of history. Rivers and lakes, politics and economy are all connected by a net, so there should be no sudden appearance. This is the charm of history. We find it, know it and understand it, but we have to repeat it and follow the path taken by our predecessors. I think of Liu Zhenyun's novel "I am Pan Jinlian". A small and unremarkable change can cause a huge butterfly effect, and everything is changing. So in this case, people will repeat a word called if. There is also such a scene in the play, which is the dialogue between the two people in the church at the end of the film. I want to thank you and hate you. God is smart enough to invent the word if, because with this word, people will keep imagining, making assumptions and making mistakes, and things will become confusing and changeable. This is quite similar to the movie "Rejuvenation". There is no if in life, so we can only move forward. As long as we look back, we will think of if. If it was a person, would you fall in love with him?