Understanding of joke stories after reading them.

After reading a work or an article, we will naturally be moved and have many feelings, but many of them are fragmentary, some are vague and disappear in an instant. To write a review, we should be good at grasping these fragmentary and even vague feelings, thinking and comparing them repeatedly, finding out two more prominent and realistic ones, then concentrating them and sorting them out on the basis of in-depth thinking. Only in this way can we do it.

Fourth, it is true and natural. That is, write your true feelings. Write how you are moved and how you think. The more concrete and true your thoughts are, the more sincere and vivid your articles will be, and the people will be encouraged.

Judging from the way of expression, the feelings after reading are often discussed in a narrative way, with the help of lyricism when necessary. Narration is to connect facts with reality. Argumentation is about feelings and reasoning. Lyric is to express the feeling after reading. Narrative language should be concise, accurate and lyrical. The three should be integrated into one, avoiding empty talk, big talk and slogans.

There are two forms of expression: one is to explain the truth with practice. This is to use my own personal experience and concrete and vivid examples to clarify the correctness of a truth from the combination of theory and practice, to concretize and visualize the theory, to make it flesh and blood, to make it reasonable and to make it clear and vivid. The second is to explain the significance from the perspective of theoretical research. According to my own research and understanding, this paper expounds a more vivid. Or evaluate the ideological significance of a work. Its function is to help readers deepen their understanding of the original text theoretically. The focus of this feeling after reading is still on the word "feeling", but it is theoretical, so we must pay attention to the characteristics of argumentative writing, such as clear arguments, typical arguments and clear and prominent centers.