The owner sent the Hanban flag to the court, and the verdict was pronounced in the first instance. What was the result?

The owner sent a banner to the property, and the verdict was that the owner should compensate and apologize to the property.

There is a community in Anhui Province. Many owners jointly gave banners to the property, which read: What can I do and be the first in collecting money? Afterwards, the property management company took the main advocate to court. According to the court's verdict, the property management company needed to compensate the company 3,000 yuan and apologize. Such a judgment is unreasonable. I think an apology is enough and there is no need for compensation. After all, the reputation of the property is not good in the local area, so there is no need to compensate. As for the apology, it was mainly due to using incorrect methods to safeguard rights. 1. The judgment requires compensation and apology

Ms. Wang is the owner of a community. Her house was damaged and had other problems. The property management company was asked to make rectifications, but the management company was not proactive and did not take any actual actions. Then, together with other owners, we presented the banner of being the best at collecting money. After review by the court, it was found that the content of Ms. Wang’s banner was indeed consistent with the property. There are also photos and physical objects as evidence for the related ills. But this way of protecting rights is not very reasonable. Therefore, Ms. Wang was ordered to pay compensation to the property and apologize. 2. Reasonable or unreasonable

I think it is hard to say that such a judgment is reasonable. From a legal perspective, it is indeed reasonable. But we also need to consider the specific situation. If Ms. Wang’s method of safeguarding her rights is wrong, which method should she use to safeguard her rights? This is basically the case with current properties. Ms. Wang’s statements are also based on actual facts. I think the court should also impose requirements on the property when making a ruling. Rather than punishing Ms. Wang alone. 3. Pay attention to how you protect your rights

When we protect our rights, we should pay more attention to our own methods. Take Ms. Wang's community as an example. There are a series of problems such as house cracking, garage leakage, and cement falling. These can all be confirmed. As long as you use the correct rights protection methods, you will definitely be able to punish the property. Sending a banner can only mock the property and has no substantive effect. However, most properties are doing this now. We hope that the relevant departments can provide reasonable solutions to ensure the rights of owners.