Why are there so few countries with good relations between China and Iran in international diplomacy? What makes us so isolated?

In fact, the most important thing is that China is under the international system dominated by western countries, and China does not follow the international rules formulated by the west. Therefore, in the debate between Obama and Romney, the US presidential candidate thinks that China is a country that does not abide by international norms. In other words, North Korea and Iran, which were previously regarded as rogue countries, are of the same nature as China. The Austrian President has always advocated guiding China into "international rules" and making it a "responsible big country". China said that he was helpless. If the "international rules" are dominated by China, not the West, then who is the "rogue state" will be decided by China. Unfortunately, China does not have this ability at present. I believe that our great, glorious and correct motherland will definitely become a superpower and lead the international process. At that time, hehe.

Objectively neutral, we can consider the following factors:

(1) The imbalance of military power in East Asia has caused a security dilemma (China's rise, neighboring countries are worried about security, and some territorial disputes reflect the concerns of neighboring countries) [facing the Asia-Pacific];

(2) China's ideology is different (the understanding of human rights and democracy brought about by communism is different from that of the West, and of course it can't be separated from the encouragement of various activists in Xinjiang, Tibet, Taiwan Province and Mongolia, as well as the lobbying of groups outside the hospital. They all expressed their concern about HR in China and thought that China was an incomprehensible evil regime that refused universalism); [Applicable to European and American countries]

(3) The United States (a hegemonic country) suppresses and dominates the international process, and tries its best to suppress the potential forces that challenge American hegemony (a bunch of small basin friends work together to isolate China) [for Asia-Pacific];

(4) China adheres to the backward sovereignty concept established in17th century (opposing new interventionism is actually afraid of being punished); [For the opposition and people-democracy-people in the process of democratic transformation in western powers and developing countries]

(5) China's economic growth and plundering of resources have caused dissatisfaction (developing countries, China actually made mistakes in this regard, not only many people in African countries complained, but of course there were misunderstandings, and countries like the United States and China are also vying for the dominance of Africa); [For Africa and the Third World]

(6) The foreign policy of non-alignment and non-confrontation leads to partial isolation (neutrality may have some negative effects) [to the whole world]. Of course, China cannot be completely neutral in fact;

(7) Some self-interests will inevitably lead to the departure of allies (take North Korea as an example, China has complicated relations with it, but in fact the divided Korean Peninsula is beneficial to China, haha; Take Russia as an example. China and Russia have been contending for the dominant position, whether in international competitions in the last century or in the current SCO (as possible allies).