On brotherhood from the Water Margin .600 words

I've made it very clear, buddy. Loyalty doesn't mean loyalty. You said we should be loyal. Indeed, we agree that loyalty is indeed a kind of righteousness. We really should talk about justice for the benefit of the country and the nation, but friendship is not like this. Dude's loyalty is completely derogatory, so we still insist on loyalty, but we don't talk about buddy loyalty and friendship. Thank you! (Applause)

Audience:

What are the pros and cons? Just now, you said that friendship between brothers is a kind name between friends. Shouldn't we middle school students have a few such intimate friends? Besides, a person has many friends in his life, including good friends and bad friends, intimate friends and fair-weather friends, so we should be careful in making friends. Who are our true friends and our partners? Each of us should be loyal and be a loyal person. Loyalty is a kind of righteousness, so shouldn't we be loyal to our buddies?

Three affirmative arguments:

Ancient Greek philosophers said that many people who look like friends are not friends, those who look like friends are not your real friends, and those who make various comments on you, although you may not be happy in your heart, are your real friends. Just like in the Tang Dynasty, Wei Zhi was the remonstrator of Li Shimin, and it was because of Wei Zhi and Li Shimin that the Tang Dynasty flourished. (Applause)

Moderator:

We still have time. Are there any questions from the audience?

Audience:

Just now, the other party said that about 80% of the students think that buddy loyalty is not good, and there are things like Liu becoming sworn, so it can be said that buddy loyalty is useless because of objective reasons, if buddy loyalty plus objective reasons equals zero. ......

Moderator:

All right, time's up. Let the audience ask questions to the opposing players. You can raise your hand to signal me.

Audience:

I want to ask the other side about the second debate. The opponent introduced the topic with "friends" from the beginning, and then talked about the pure friendship between friends, not the real "brotherhood", as well as Liu's "Taoyuan Sanjieyi" and "Water Margin" elaborated by the opponent. This doesn't count together, but our topic today is "Should middle school students talk about brotherhood?" I think the other party should. The other party made a point, not about us middle school students. Thank you. (Applause)

Two opposing views:

Have we misinterpreted the brotherhood according to what the other party said? The other debater said many times that we misinterpreted the friendship between brothers. In fact, the friendship between brothers is a pure friendship. And everything is based on historical facts, don't you think? (Applause)

Audience:

Sorry, the topic we are talking about is "Should middle school students talk about friendship", and the protagonist of our debate should be "middle school students", not historical figures. Thank you. (Applause)

Against:

We just say that we middle school students, as witnesses of history, should be loyal to each other, and the real friends mentioned by the other side also have friendship with each other. Just now, the other debater also said that there is friendship between real friends. His original words are: There is not only friendship between Liu He, which means that there is also friendship between them. In this case, shouldn't we be loyal to our true friends? I think it should be. (Applause)

Audience:

I want to ask the other side a debate: you should know the word "underworld". In this group, more than 90% of students come together by brotherhood, but if students want to talk about brotherhood as you said, why doesn't the government advocate it but crack down on it? (Applause)

Against:

It's my pleasure to answer your question. I'd like to ask everyone to pay attention first: criminal gangs are not talking about friendship between brothers, but friendship between rivers and lakes. They are wearing the skin of friendship of their brothers and doing what Jianghu people do. This is the so-called "selling dog meat by hanging sheep's head". Haven't the other party heard of it? How do you know that the government is cracking down on buddy loyalty? Has the government issued a notice? Thank you. (Applause)

Audience:

I want to ask the opposing side three arguments. In our life, we can see many examples of brotherhood. They call each other brothers on weekdays. When a buddy is beaten, he will gang up and attack. The light one hurts the bones and muscles, and the heavy one takes his life. Is that what you call buddy loyalty? Is the loyalty of these brothers still worth cherishing and persisting in? If you still insist on the loyalty of these buddies, I advise you to turn back as soon as possible. "The sea of suffering is boundless, and turning back is the shore; It's not too late to pull back from the cliff "(laughter, applause).

Against:

We believe that the front is not a cliff, but a flat avenue. So, is it necessary to "pull back from the cliff" when walking on a flat road? I don't think so. We should go forward bravely and run to the other side of victory. Moreover, as we have said in the argument, the true friendship of a buddy is not to jump with his friend when he jumps into the fire pit, but to help him. This is the true friendship of the brothers. Thank you. (Applause)

Audience:

Just now, the other party has been talking about the benefits of friendship, but has never mentioned any examples that can convince us. The examples in literary works are unconvincing. If that's the case, we can also write a novel to refute the disadvantages of buddy loyalty and ask the other debater to give convincing examples. Thank you. (Applause)

Against:

Then we can't ...

Moderator:

All right, time's up. Next, we will go to the last link of this debate-the conclusion. First, ask the other party to make a three-minute concluding statement. Time begins.

Four arguments of the opposing side:

Thank you, chairman, judges and teachers, audience friends, hello! I want to answer the question just now. Let me tell you a vivid example. There is a disabled person in a high school in Luoyang. His seven classmates helped him, and then they were admitted to a key university together. It is this loyalty that allows them to be admitted to the university at the same time. Isn't this a vivid example? Ok, now I'm going to start my speech. It is well known that China paid attention to "loyalty" since ancient times. Guan Gong was named as a "righteous god", and now all over the country worship him and burn incense to worship Buddha. So should we middle school students also talk about brotherhood? Before I talk about this topic, please allow me to point out a few mistakes made by the other party. First, the facts are unclear. It seems that the other debater never understood what we were talking about. The debate situation is based on a full understanding of the purpose of the debate. It seems that the other debater has not really understood what true friendship is, but blindly understood it as narrow friendship. Is this right? Can we admit it? Of course we can't admit it. (Laughter, applause) What another debater did was really "seeing the moon but not the sun". Second, the statement is unclear. The other debater can't explain his point of view, just give examples. However, the examples you cited can't clarify your point of view, and you have never answered our questions directly. Isn't this the best interpretation of "stealing the column"? (Applause). Since the other debater didn't hear our argument clearly, let me explain brotherhood again. In the dictionary, "loyalty" means "integrity and loyalty", and "buddy" means "affectionate address between brothers or good friends". Why can't we put them together? But the other party confused them. Is it your fault? (Applause) Today, the brotherhood we advocate is the spirit of unity, not the loyalty of rivers and lakes. Remember the 5 12 earthquake? "Coke Boy" would rather lose his right arm to save his classmates. When the reporter asked him, "Why did you do this?" He said, "Because this is my buddy!" Because I want to be loyal, I would rather trade my arm for his life, I do! Remember Fan Paopao? The teacher who is famous for running out doesn't care about the students' lives at all. But he ran away by himself. Of course I spit on him. So, which one do you want to be, another debater? It must be the first kind, that is, people who are loyal to others! In other words, you agree with us. Another debater, please wake up and understand what true friendship is. Let's live together, grow up happily and be loyal people together. Once again, reiterate our view that middle school students should be loyal to each other! Thank you (applause)

Moderator:

All right, time's up. Next, please welcome the four debates to make concluding remarks. The time is also three minutes. Time begins.

There are four arguments on the positive side:

Thank you, Chairman, distinguished judges, ladies and gentlemen, hello! Throughout the whole game, the focus of the debate between other debaters and us has been focused on whether students should be loyal to each other. The eloquence and sincere attitude of the other debater is really worth learning, but when you think about it carefully, it doesn't cover up some mistakes in their arguments. The other debater is also very friendly and cunning, and always uses "small steps and slow steps" to avoid our questions (laughter). So let me point out many shortcomings of other debaters. First, loyalty and friendship are different from "brotherhood" and cannot replace friendship and friendship. Loyalty includes the loyalty of buddies, but friendship is different from friendship. So, buddy, loyalty is by no means friendship. Second, buddy loyalty is just a title between classmates. Learning helps you and life helps you. Then please note that friendship is definitely not friendship. Don't always bomb us with concept bombers. Third, is buddy loyalty a friend or a relative? Don't! No. Friends are friendship, relatives are affection. Do you want to get along well with your relatives? Fourth, ask the other debater to show their propaganda slogan. What is the meaning of "righteousness" in their propaganda slogan? That "righteousness" is "righteousness", the spirit of justice. Your concept bomber is very powerful, and the smell of gunfire is really strong. (Laughter) Fifth, the three of them, Liu, came together by different routes at first, but later, it was because they were loyal to each other and avenged Guan Yu and Zhang Fei that they ended up as a "white emperor" (applause). So the conclusion statement is to state our point of view: students should not be loyal to each other! There are several reasons. 1. From a historical point of view, as we have demonstrated, buddy loyalty is a narrow feudal moral concept, which is actually a narrow loyalty that abandons principles for the sake of friends. This kind of brotherhood will be mercilessly abandoned by history with the development of the times. 2. From a political point of view, friends pay attention to the development of small groups and do things that are not allowed by law for personal gain. This kind of brotherhood will be mercilessly abandoned by history with the development of the times. From the real life, many young people in society regard friendship as friendship. You give me a box of cigarettes today and I'll treat you to dinner tomorrow. You taught me a lesson this morning, and I will make you bleed tonight. To sum up, students should not talk about brotherhood. We want to thank the TV station for providing us with such a platform. We feel extremely precious by consulting materials and learning from each other. Our loyalty to others is not shallow! There are three ways to choose friends in The Analects: "Friends are straight, friends believe and friends listen". Let's walk into real friendship and stay away from brotherhood!