Which expert proposed the ban on straw burning in rural areas? Is there any scientific basis for this?

I’m afraid it’s difficult to find the specific person.

When I was young, I often followed the adults to burn straw in the fields. To be honest, I didn’t feel the environment was bad. I could still see the stars very clearly at night. But around 2000, there was a There are obvious changes. Every year when wheat and corn are harvested, soot starts to float in the air and the sky becomes gray. Later, burning is banned.

To be honest, although we are not professional about these things, we can still find some problems through comparison:

1. Burning straw used to be okay, but now it has an impact on the environment, which means that burning straw Straw is not the primary factor causing environmental degradation, but it does have a negative impact on the environment.

2. After the burning ban, environmental problems still exist.

In addition, by comparing with the previous life, we will also find that there were many piles of straw in rural areas in the past, most of which were used for retting green manure, heating in winter and making fires for cooking. The processing of straw is relatively simple. dispersion.

Now, we can see that the straw is basically burned at once, and very few are left. This kind of concentrated burning is a test for the environmental endurance.

After the ban on burning, we can also feel that during the summer and autumn harvests, there is less smoke and less soot, which has indeed improved the environment. The most important thing is that there are fewer fires!

But environmental problems have not been eradicated.

In addition, after the burning ban, we will also find some new problems: there are more pests, a large amount of untreated straw is returned directly to the fields, and the pollution of surface water begins to increase.

It doesn’t matter which expert proposed it, the basis he pointed out is also unrealistic. First of all, he is certainly not a farmer and has never considered issues from a farmer's perspective. Humans have learned to use fire since primitive society, and until modern history when farmers burned straw in their fields, no one said it polluted the environment. Since the gradual development of industry, environmental pollution has become more and more serious, especially in the chemical industry, automobile industry, and steel industry. Excessive development of industries and real estate has led to a series of severe environmental pollution. Because human beings are obsessed with interests, they put economic interests first in everything they do, and often ignore the natural environment. Only when the environmental pollution becomes increasingly worse do they realize how important the beautiful natural environment is to human survival. At this time, those so-called "experts" who are living in poverty need to find some scapegoats to take the blame for the bad environment. Who should they turn to? Those big bosses and big bosses who never touch the earth must not be offended. They can only drag out peasants with no status and no conscience to take the blame. It’s a good idea, we farmers will not take the blame!

Everyone knows that burning straw has been a traditional Chinese method since ancient times and has been the simplest and most effective method for generations. Why experts now want to ban it is because of the following reasons:

1. Today’s planting area is hundreds or thousands of times that of ancient times. The exhaust gas produced by burning straw is only slightly different from that in ancient times. Friends who have seen the smoke and dust can describe the scene as a dark sky and a dark earth.

2. The increase in planting area has led to serious urban haze, seriously affecting people's travel safety and health.

3. In response to national policies and global climate warming, in order to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, not only is straw burning prohibited, but all coal boilers and other harmful environmental factors are to be dismantled!

Therefore, banning straw burning is a very correct decision made by the country, but it is often prohibited again and again! That’s because of the supporting costs and the system is not perfect yet. Farmers will not be able to farm the next year if they don’t burn the straw. This is a real problem that still needs to be solved.

Nowadays no farmer dares to burn anything. Once it is burned, they will go in!

But the straw all over the ground really worries the farmers, because burning straw every winter has been a tradition for thousands of years, and farmers all know the benefits of doing so:

1 , Reduce the occurrence of pests and diseases. A large part of germs and insect eggs are stored in straw. Burning them with fire can kill the germs and insect eggs stored in straw. This method is the most effective and cheapest way of processing.

2. Reduce the number of weeds. Most of the weeds fall on the surface of cultivated land after they mature. Except for some weeds that reproduce through tubers, burning straw can clean up most of the grass seeds and reduce the number of weeds in the fields next season. 3. Fertile fields.

The ashes after straw burning contain a large amount of potassium and phosphorus, and can be directly applied to the soil without being decomposed and then absorbed by the soil for crops to absorb. 4. Increase soil porosity. The high temperature of straw burning causes the surface layer of the soil to expand due to heat, improving the physical properties of the surface soil and increasing the porosity of the soil.

The bigger problem is that the straw is not allowed to be burned and is just thrown into the fields, which will directly affect farmers’ spring sowing and cultivation next spring.

Would anyone say that not all straw can be recycled? Then you can go to rural areas and ask what the proportion of recycling is, and you will know whether this is feasible or not.

Nowadays, with the help of coercive means, straw burning has won the first battle, and the sky above the city is clear. But do the experts also have to think about the farmer brothers and can they find ways to solve their practical problems?

I personally think that experts should first study the development and utilization of this straw. If it can be burned, it can be used as fuel, and if humans and animals can eat it, it can be used as food and fertilizer. At the same time, the difficulty is not high and the cost is low, and enterprises are encouraged to convert it into productivity. Enterprises need straw. If ordinary people can sell straw, who will burn the straw? Or if an expert says that straw can be returned to the fields, you, the expert, have to come up with ideas and methods to let the people do it and teach us. It is a fact that the straw cannot be returned to the fields now because it has not rotted in the second year, making farming inconvenient. In addition, the strong spring wind has filled the sky with straw leaves, which has damaged the environment. Therefore, experts suggest that it is a good thing to provide advice to the government. But do it well.

The ban on burning straw in rural areas was not proposed by any expert, nor was it banned just because some expert said it was prohibited. The reason why we see some experts talk about the harm caused by burning straw and later call on everyone not to burn straw is because the experts have a high position and are respected. It is also fancy to invite them to appear on the camera and expose themselves. What they say is authoritative and convincing.

The ban on burning straw is a common awareness that everyone has formed after seeing the harm caused by burning straw. Most people can recognize the harm caused by burning straw and support the ban on burning straw. For example, I also support the ban on burning straw, but I am relatively weak. No one has asked me to preach about the harm caused by burning straw, so everyone can’t see me but the experts. In other words, the experts also support the ban on burning straw. Spokesperson for some people. Of course, the real prohibition on burning straw is the law.

Yes, burning straw mainly causes air pollution and affects the environment. Burning straw will produce a large amount of nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, hydrocarbons and smoke, which are the main culprits of air pollution; the particulate matter produced by burning will also cause harm to the human body after being breathed by people; it will affect traffic, cause fire hazards, and damage the soil. Structure, etc., these are the hazards caused by burning straw.

Burning straw does have certain benefits. Firstly, it can reduce the expenses incurred in handling straw; secondly, it can kill pests and diseases. However, these benefits are not proportional to the harm caused by incineration. Obviously, the harm of incineration outweighs the benefits of incineration.

The previous era of slash-and-burn farming has passed. Now we are in a highly developed industrial society. Every day we have to face all kinds of pollution from all aspects. Vehicle exhaust, industrial dust, burning coal, etc. will all produce pollution, including burning straw. Even each of us produces garbage and creates pollution in our daily lives.

What we have to do is to face pollution from all aspects and carry out comprehensive prevention and control. Perhaps we have only seen the ban on burning straw in order to prevent and control air pollution. We have not seen that the country has also closed down some high-energy-consuming, high-pollution enterprises and small workshops in order to save energy and reduce emissions.

Whether you see it or not, it is undeniable that preventing and controlling air pollution and protecting the environment are all for us to see that the sky has become blue, the mountains have become green, and the water has become clear.

This expert’s idea itself is unscientific and unscientific. We cannot look at things solely from the perspective of environmental protection. China has burned straw for thousands of years. It would be bad if it changed.

Burn wood in mountainous areas, coal in plains, natural gas in cities, and straw in rural areas. Especially in the Northeast, straw is not burned. In the cold weather of minus 20 to 48 degrees in the Northeast, there is no need to use wood and straw to burn fire walls. The heated kang is alive. Using natural gas for heating is not only expensive, but also dangerous.

In terms of resources themselves, coal, natural gas, and hydropower.

For our planet, it is a limited and non-recyclable primary energy source. Sooner or later it will be used up. Moreover, our country still relies on imports of natural gas and oil. Why not use this resource as a necessary and reserve energy source to provide What about leaving some for future generations?

Straw is provided by growing crops. It is a sustainable and renewable clean energy. It is an inexhaustible energy source and emits carbon dioxide. Compared with coal, it is What about clean energy? Moreover, the burned plant ash is an excellent potash fertilizer. It is possible to say that burning straw can lead to fire addiction.

In summary, I think our experts should research the consequences before issuing policies. We cannot force it without considering the consequences. It hurts people's hearts and is unscientific. .

I personally think that experts should first study the development and utilization of this straw. If it can be burned, it can be used as fuel, and if humans and animals can eat it, it can be used as food and fertilizer. At the same time, the difficulty is not high and the cost is low, and enterprises are encouraged to convert it into productivity. Enterprises need straw. If ordinary people can sell straw, who will burn the straw? Or if an expert says that straw can be returned to the fields, you, the expert, have to come up with ideas and methods to let the people do it and teach us. It is a fact that the straw cannot be returned to the fields now because it has not rotted in the second year, making farming inconvenient. In addition, the strong spring wind has filled the sky with straw leaves, which has damaged the environment. Therefore, experts suggest that it is a good thing to provide advice to the government. But do it well.

Which expert proposed the ban on burning straw in rural areas? Is there any scientific basis for this?

Straw is rice straw, wheat straw, corn stalk, high-grain stalk, etc.

In the past, after many farmers harvested rice, wheat, and corn, because they did not have much time to collect the straw, some people would directly set a fire in the field to burn the straw into ashes. Because they didn't know how to deal with the straw at that time. They could put the straw directly in the fields without rotting. Affect later planting.

However, burning straw in the open air not only pollutes the air, but if the wind blows, it is easy to cause fires, causing serious consequences. Moreover, when straw is burned in the field, the high temperature in the field destroys a lot of organic matter and burns the field into pits.

Currently, the state stipulates that burning straw in the open is prohibited.

Penalties will be imposed if straw is burned in the open air.

Nowadays, most of the rice and wheat in our rural areas are harvested by machines. During harvesting, the straw is crushed directly in the fields to make fertilizer.

If our farmers don’t know how to deal with straw, they can ask the relevant local village cadres. They should tell you how to handle it.

There is a scientific basis for prohibiting open burning of straw in rural areas.

We farmers should all abide by this!

An ordinary natural law is now prohibited by today's air pollution, and the prohibition is strict.

The ban on straw burning has become an important topic. Every harvest season, the government begins to promote straw burning. Slogans and banners are everywhere. It has become a beautiful scenery in the countryside, and at the same time it is a waste of human and financial resources. Propaganda vehicles and law enforcement officers were running around all day long, and law enforcement officers could be seen in the fields at any time. In fact, straw burning has been highly recognized in the minds of farmers, and people have recognized the return of straw to the fields. In fact, during the busy farming period, all the village groups need to do is broadcast it, and there is no need to waste manpower and material resources.

Although straw burning causes temporary pollution to the environment, returning straw to fields has become a headache for farmers. Although straw is no longer burned, it pollutes water sources and has a serious impact on aquatic resources. A large amount of straw is returned to the fields and soaked in water for a period of time, and the wastewater flows into the river, causing a serious aquaculture problem. Drinking water sources are also the first to bear the burden. At the same time, the amount of seeds used for sowing is increased, and the disease is serious. The more chemical pesticides are used, which affects the food supply. Safety brings hidden dangers, thus failing to meet pollution residue standards, which has an impact on people's health.

In fact, human beings are closely related to the natural world. The ancients said that wildfires are endless, and spring breezes blow again. In fact, this is not the case. Nowadays, weeds are growing wildly in farmland, and pests and diseases are serious. However, straw burning has been banned, and farmers have no choice but to lament and invest even more. More, but increases the burden on farmers. It is true that grain production has increased, but the cost has increased. In the end, the income minus the cost, farmers get only a meager income, so farmers lose their enthusiasm for farming and lead to land transfer, but the land after transfer has Some are okay, but some are severely neglected and only bring serious consequences to food production. Don’t you think deeply about it?

Regardless of whether it is straw burning or straw burning, the government should consider how to deal with the problem of straw in farmland, instead of consuming manpower and material resources to manage the burning problem, but try to solve the problem of returning straw to the field, and burning will not pollute. Burning also pollutes. Could it be that after so many years, those experts have come up with any solution to solve the problem of straw returning to the fields? Or are they pseudo-experts who do not want to live in the world and just want to be quick instead of solving the problems in farmers' production? Earning a generous salary but doing nothing about human affairs.

Nowadays, returning straw to fields has become a rule, but I hope some experts can come up with specific solutions to solve the problem of serious consequences of returning straw to fields for water pollution. Who is responsible, but farmers are the victims and will always be the victims. Victims, first of all, cannot burn straw. If you burn straw, you will be punished or sent to a detention center. What about water pollution? Farmers and livestock industries are the first to blame. Nowadays, the investment in farming is too large and the profit is too low, especially the manpower required for chemical fertilizers, pesticides and pesticides. If the consumption of fertilizers and pesticides is too great, crops will not be able to grow, and the intensity of weeding is too great. Don’t experts consider food security? Maybe those experts don't eat food, so why do they bring up food security? Isn't this contradictory?

Straw burning is a mountain on the farmers’ heads. The farmers who are pressed don’t know what to do. It is illegal to burn straw and it is difficult to plant without burning. Let’s just say we don’t farm. The farmers have little income, so the farmers are suffering. Ah, tired. Maybe some people will say, why are farmers suffering? It’s very leisurely, right? Then please don’t go to work and try to plant acres of land in the countryside and see how you feel. Clothing and food are all problems, why not? Aren’t these issues worth pondering about supporting a family?

Who caused the current loss of confidence in farming due to straw burning? But think about it, it is of course the experts because they raised this issue but have no plan to solve it. Don’t experts? Responsibility? There are pros and cons to the problem, but how to look at the problem requires careful and thoughtful consideration.

Let me share my views on the issue of straw burning in rural areas.

1. In rural areas, straw was used for burning firewood and cooking. Since there is no energy for the process, burning straw is the only way. The smoke in our memories is such a beautiful picture!

In the past two years, we are no longer allowed to use straw for cooking. I really don’t understand. Talking about polluting the environment, anyone who has spent time in rural areas knows that this is nonsense. It's not a waste of energy, it's a utilization of energy. Burning straw is also different from burning coal. The use value of coal is far from the value of providing heat energy. After reaction, more valuable products can be formed. And straw is inexhaustible.

2. If the straw in the field is burned, I think this should be banned. Straw is the light energy that plants fix for the earth. It is the energy that plants convert solar energy into chemical energy that is fixed to the earth and enters the energy supply chain within the earth. We shouldn't just burn it and waste it.

Returning straw to fields is something we should strongly advocate. You should not stop eating because of some problems in returning the fields. Instead, you should find scientific ways to solve the problems based on your actual situation.

Returning straw to fields benefits the country and the people.

Objectively speaking, straw burning does cause certain pollution, especially during the period of concentrated burning, the air will be emitted with a strong smell of smoke. However, banning burning also requires conditional and necessary solutions and measures, rather than solving the problem with the word "ban" and leaving all conflicts to farmers.

First of all, we need to tell farmers that straw burning is not a major source of pollution and that burning straw is not such a big "sin". However, when the environment has been greatly harmed and the pollution is already very serious, any aspect of pollution will aggravate environmental deterioration. Therefore, everyone must actively participate in environmental protection, so that farmers can consciously maintain the environment and not burn straw.

Second, we need to tell farmers how to deal with straw. When farmers have no better way, they can only solve the problem through burning. Therefore, if we want farmers not to burn straw, we must tell them how to solve the straw problem without causing any impact on the environment.

Third, we need to tell farmers that the government can help solve the problem. This is undoubtedly the result that farmers want to see most. Therefore, it is necessary to speed up research on straw processing methods to provide farmers with a platform for straw processing. I believe that with these platforms, farmers can provide strong support. At the same time, certain subsidies can be given to farmers who handle straw voluntarily. After all, once the straw is processed, it may become fertilizer for improving the soil.

In short, we should guide farmers to deal with the straw problem, help farmers deal with straw properly, and encourage farmers to use waste instead of wasting straw and prohibiting burning.

There is no scientific basis for the ban on burning straw and weeds. To put it bluntly, it is a disguised way to bully farmers. Burning straw and weeds is conducive to farmland cultivation: 1. Reduces pests and diseases in the soil.

2. Reduce weed overgrowth, because burning can burn most of the weed seeds, reducing the investment in weeding in the coming year.

3. It is conducive to mechanical farming. If it is not burned, straw or weeds will hinder mechanical farming.

4 Plant ash is the most rare potassium fertilizer in agriculture today. Its potassium content is much higher than that of various potassium fertilizers sold on the market, and it does not cost a penny.

The smoke generated by burning straw and weeds does not affect the environment, does not produce harmful substances to the air, and does not contain sulfur dioxide. In today's society where farming cannot support a family, the right approach is to minimize unnecessary investment in agriculture and reduce social conflicts. I am from Weinan, Shaanxi, which is the largest daylily producing area in the country. If the daylily leaves and stems are not burned in winter, the yield will be reduced by more than 30% compared to burning the stems in the next year. If it doesn't burn, work will have to be done to cut and transport it. Experts were invited to conduct on-the-spot inspections in rural areas. Weeds were overgrown in front of and behind the village and on both sides of the road. Village cadres were helpless. Clearing them required work and labor, which cost a lot of money. Failure to clear them would affect the appearance of the village.