What's wrong with not reporting when you go out?

The report system for cadres going out in party member is an important part of the report system for instructions and an important aspect of organizational discipline. Failure to strictly implement the system of going out to report is a trivial matter on the surface, but in fact it is a typical manifestation of poor organizational discipline, which often hides serious problems and even becomes a hidden indicator of corruption of leading cadres in party member. According to Article 73 of the Regulations on Disciplinary Actions, those who fail to report their personal whereabouts as required or report their whereabouts truthfully, if the circumstances are serious, shall be punished. Therefore, party member cadres should strengthen the Party's concept, enhance the awareness of organizational discipline, and strictly implement the reporting system. They must not think that this is a personal privacy or a trivial matter, let alone truthfully report their personal whereabouts to the party organization.

For public officials in Beijing, the requirement of "leaving Beijing for the record" should not be unfamiliar. However, the Supervision Committee of the Commission for Discipline Inspection of Chaoyang District, Beijing recently conducted a special inspection of 133 units in the whole district, and found that more than 100 people left Beijing during May Day, and dozens of units had problems in formulating relevant systems and working arrangements, mainly reflected in imperfect rules and regulations, discounts, incomplete system implementation, fraud and so on.

It is the basic requirement of party member cadres to truthfully report personal matters and personal whereabouts according to regulations. Failure to report to Beijing reflects that the relevant personnel and units are indifferent to discipline and rules and do not take the system seriously.

A few units did not take the report of leaving Beijing seriously, and some people were lucky enough to hide it.

"Government agencies, enterprises and institutions should strictly implement the relevant policy requirements for people leaving Beijing, emphasize the employee leave reporting system, and earnestly grasp the employees' intention to leave Beijing." During the epidemic, Pang, deputy director of Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, will give a prompt at the 1 meeting whenever holidays are approaching.

Last year's "Regulations of the Communist Party of China (CPC) on Asking for Report on Major Matters" stipulated that "party member should generally ask for report on major matters from its party organization." Major events refer to important events and situations that are beyond the authority of Party organizations and leading cadres in party member, or have a bearing on the overall situation and have a wide influence. This is the case when cadres leave Beijing during special periods such as epidemics and holidays.

The implementation of the report system of leave from Beijing during the "May 1" period is an entry point chosen by the Supervision Committee of Chaoyang District Commission for Discipline Inspection, and its intention is to "combine the relevant disciplinary requirements during the epidemic period and promote the implementation of the reporting requirements for major issues".

Previously, a community cadre in Chaoyang District went out of Beijing privately before the Spring Festival, and was stranded by the local epidemic prevention and control policy, unable to return to work in time.

"When the epidemic broke out suddenly, the grassroots staff were very nervous and the work arrangements were decisive. If the cadres do not report in advance when they leave Beijing, the unit does not grasp the actual situation, and it is easy to cause personnel deployment when encountering emergencies or temporary work that needs to be handled. Passive. " The person in charge of the Party Style and Political Style Supervision Office of the Supervision Committee of the Chaoyang District Commission for Discipline Inspection said.

In fact, there are many regulations about going out to report. 20 13 the State Council, China issued the Notice on Further Strengthening the Report of Leading Cadres Going Abroad. In order to implement the spirit of the document, various localities and departments quickly introduced corresponding systems and constantly improved them. For example, the Working Rules of Beijing Municipal People's Government clearly stipulates that the principal responsible persons of municipal government departments, ad hoc organizations and directly affiliated institutions must ask for leave from the competent deputy mayor in advance when they leave Beijing for a visit, business trip, full-time study or vacation. After the leave is approved, it should be reported to the municipal government.

The Chaoyang District Party Committee and District Government also made clear regulations on the leave and report of the main leaders of all units, requiring all units in the region to formulate specific measures for the leave and report of cadres in their own departments and units. On the eve of "May 1", Chaoyang District Party Committee and Government put forward clear requirements for party member cadres and public officials to leave Beijing during holidays, and all units must strictly implement the leave reporting system when leaving Beijing.

The Supervision Committee of the Chaoyang District Commission for Discipline Inspection combined the implementation of the reporting requirements for major issues with the disciplinary requirements during the epidemic period, and carried out a special inspection on the leave from Beijing during the May 1 ST period in the whole district 133 unit.

"This inspection involved more than 40,000 party member cadres and public officials, and found that about a quarter of the units had the problem of not reporting to Beijing to varying degrees. As few as one or two, as many as ten. * * * There are still 100 people who have not reported, most of whom are cadres below the department level. " The person in charge of the Party Style and Political Style Supervision Office of the Supervision Committee of the Chaoyang District Commission for Discipline Inspection said.

Specific to this inspection, the general process is as follows: First, the party committees of all units conduct self-examination to sort out whether there are omissions in the reports of cadres and workers leaving Beijing; Then, the grassroots discipline inspection and supervision organs, accredited institutions, etc. Check the ledger; Finally, publicize the situation of going out in the unit and accept the supervision of the masses in order to find problems.

"It is not so much a special inspection as a personal supervision based on daily supervision and inspection. The focus of this inspection is to find out the problems existing in the implementation system of each unit in order to supervise the implementation of the system. " The relevant person in charge of the Supervision Committee of Chaoyang District Commission for Discipline Inspection introduced.

Then, why didn't you report or not report after the district party committee and government put forward clear work requirements?

"We believe that although a few people have a weak sense of rules, the unit also has certain responsibilities." The relevant person in charge of the Supervision Committee of the Chaoyang District Commission for Discipline Inspection analyzed that on the one hand, some units did not take the report of leaving Beijing seriously, and did not combine the work discipline requirements during the epidemic, so that some cadres did not know that it was necessary to report; On the other hand, although some units have formulated relevant systems, there are simple cases of layer-by-layer forwarding, turning around or staying in oral communication, which are not strictly enforced or selectively enforced in actual work.

For example, some units are too simple in formulating the report on cadres' going out, and only generally propose to report when they leave Beijing, but there are no clear requirements on who to report to, whether it needs approval, by whom, and the form of the report; Although some units at the same level have formulated the system, they are not related to subordinate secondary units, which makes the coverage effect of the system discounted. In the same unit, departments with heavy tasks and fast work pace will strictly implement filing. If the task is light and there are few temporary arrangements, it may be just so-so.