When we talk about the color chart not being colorful enough, what exactly do we mean?

Gaozi said: Food, color, and sex.

Although the ancients talked about "color", "sex" and the like, they were never purely exclusive references, they were general references. But in modern times, it seems that we only need to understand that it meets our needs when we need them. I have heard this saying: As long as a man is 8 to 80 years old, he must be interested in two things, one is a beautiful big sister/woman, and the other is an excavator. I don't agree with such absolute remarks, but modern men and women are advancing with the times in their pursuit of sexual freedom.

When some people do not have this kind of realistic ability to act, they often resort to borrowing money from others. Have you often seen this comparison? On social media, many women who post sexy photos always have more fans, views, and likes than women with other content. This may no longer be a question of whether it is fake or not, but whether it can satisfy certain needs of the viewer, even if it is fake and beautified, is the huge driving force for its existence.

Just like this joke that has been passed down for many years: There is a mixture of fish and snakes on the Internet, swords and swords, but only when the old driver drives, there is a peaceful atmosphere underneath. In order to avoid confusion with the professional terminology of mathematics and optics, Color Map, or because some things are difficult to express directly, the term "astringent picture" appeared on the Internet to implicitly refer to slightly erotic pictures. It may be slightly different from the verbal "pornographic pictures" and the more clearly defined "erotic pictures", "pornographic pictures", "obscene pictures" (from mild to severe), etc.

So, when we discuss that the old driver’s erotic pictures are not erotic enough (the astringent pictures are not astringent enough), what exactly are we referring to? Are your eyes not captivating enough? The posture is not voluptuous enough? (Breasts) not big enough, waist not thin enough, legs not long enough? Not enough exposed and not covered enough? ...Whether it is a photo of a real person, a self-created photo of a person, or a photo of a non-human being, as long as it is a pornographic picture with the purpose of "causing sexual excitement", you may be able to say something about it.

However, in fact, there are many more realistic and related things, but I have not been able to tell them one, two, three. For example, it seems that financial freedom is achieved, so how to achieve financial freedom specifically? For example, it seems to realize an ideal, but what kind of ideal is it specifically? For example, if you want to go out and try something new, where and how can you try it out? ... Sometimes I feel that the so-called ideals, pursuits, freedom, etc. are just a slogan or a slogan. Whether it is because it is big and broad, or confusing and far away, there may be one or two keywords, but there are only those one or two. keyword.

Perhaps because the so-called ideal is not a color picture, if this color picture does not look good, you can change it to another one. For viewers, it only takes a few dozen seconds or a minute or two.

However, the reason why ideals are always elusive, stagnant, and unachievable may be because I have never thought of using them as color diagrams to explain, point out, and optimize where the color is not enough and how to achieve it. More color.

Perhaps, this is not just an ideal, but for many things, perhaps we should be down-to-earth, concrete and step-by-step, and regard it as just a color map.