On the construction site, in the long run, is the builder better or the surveyor better?

The builder focuses on the command, arrangement, coordination and management of on-site contracting teams or affairs. There are many daily work contents, such as technology, quality, production schedule, visa, materials, etc. And the builder should be involved. The builder is not a technical post, but a management, coordination and communication post. Development direction: small foreman → big foreman → deputy project manager (production) → production manager (deputy project manager) → project manager.

Surveyor is the most basic and important technical work in the construction site. Daily work is more professional. Holding the instrument to pay off or check the line is a purely technical post, and there is no need to deal with those 7788 things. Development direction: surveyor → technician → assistant to project manager (technology) → technical director → project manager.

Both of them belong to the basic positions in the construction site, so don't worry so much about what to do first, because the eight members are the foundation and should both know something, which is good for the management of higher positions in the future. If I had to choose one, I would choose a professional surveyor. Because I am in the technical group, I can learn more technical experience. Without personal background, these experiences will be more beneficial to you in the future, and can help you better test various certificates and evaluate professional titles. The premise is that no matter which position you are in, you must keep learning in order to be promoted continuously. Finally, a higher position depends on whether the company appreciates you or not.