Some people say that Call of Duty plagiarized through the line of fire. what do you think?

These two games are not the same concept. CF has a blood volume display, which cannot be recovered under normal circumstances. Guns are fired blindly, few weapons are aimed organically (there is no transitional action), and the sense of attack is relatively weak. Many characters wear strange clothes to the battlefield (is it really ok to wear tactical vests). Krypton system is not particularly reasonable. All kinds of strange guns (distributed fairy (? ω? ) )。 The combat rhythm of multiplayer mode is relatively gentle.

COD breathes for blood, weapons are close to reality (except COD sci-fi works), details are in place, the sense of attack is strong, the figures are realistic (except COD sci-fi works), weapons must be aimed at by machines to hit accurately, and the rhythm of multiplayer mode is faster. Even the killing reward can make some players stunned, even if they don't watch the death replay, they don't know how to die at all.

Call of Duty plagiarizes CF, which is probably not a war. COD 1 was released in 2004, and CF was released in 2007. From this point of view, the latecomers said that the first plagiarism was probably untenable.