Joke Collection Website - Talk about mood - "Animal Court" Kindergarten Class Lesson Plan

"Animal Court" Kindergarten Class Lesson Plan

As a teacher, you may need to prepare lesson plans. Lesson plans are the key point in the transformation from lesson preparation to classroom teaching. So what does an excellent lesson plan look like? The following is the "Animal Court" kindergarten class lesson plan that I collected for your reference. I hope it can help friends in need. "Animal Court" Kindergarten Class Lesson Plan 1

[Activity Objectives]

1. Experience the roles of the plaintiff and the defendant in the court, briefly understand the predatory relationship between living things, and initially perceive animals and plants Close relationship with the environment.

2. Be bold during the debate. Express your views clearly and be able to initially learn to look at problems with dialectical thinking.

3. Stimulate self-protection awareness and improve the ability to avoid danger

[Activity Focus]

Experience the roles of the plaintiff and the defendant in the court, briefly understand the predatory relationship between living things, and initially perceive the close relationship between animals, plants and the environment.

[Activity Difficulty]

Be able to boldly and clearly express your views during the debate, and be able to initially learn to use dialectical thinking to look at problems.

[Activity preparation]

Material preparation: Courseware: Pictures and representative cards of the plaintiff and defendant: Voices of various characters: Animal world, leopards preying on animals, videos of lions picking leopards .

Experience preparation: preliminary understanding of the roles in the court and knowledge of the survival relationships between animals and plants in nature.

[Activity process]

1. Watch the video. A preliminary understanding of the cruel predatory relationship that exists in nature.

Ti Jian: What did you see? What are they doing?

Summary: Various animals bring vitality and vitality to nature. But there are natural phenomena such as leopards preying on antelopes.

2. Go into the court and understand the roles of the plaintiff and the defendant in the court.

Question: Who are the parties in the court? What is a plaintiff? What is a defendant? What are the duties of a judge?

Summary: There is a judge, a plaintiff and a defendant in the court. The plaintiff is the party who files a lawsuit to the court to protect his rights and interests. The defendant is the party sued by the plaintiff. The judge is the person who makes the final judgment.

3. Debate in groups in the moot court, understand the predatory relationship between organisms and the close relationship between animals, plants and the environment, and express your opinions boldly and clearly during the debate.

(1) Organize debates and express your views boldly and clearly.

①Play the statements of antelope and leopard. Question: What did the antelope and the leopard say? Who do you support? Discuss individually. Share your reasons with your peers.

②Double debate, the plaintiff and defendant each recommend one child for development, and the remaining children can supplement.

Based on the content of the children’s debate, the teacher provides relevant video materials: a leopard is killed by a higher-level lion, a short video of an antelope causing a disaster, etc.

③Remind children that if your views change based on the debate just now, you can adjust your support team.

Summary: It is indeed very cruel for a weak antelope to be hunted by a leopard. But the leopard did eat the sheep for survival. This case is difficult to decide. The court is temporarily adjourned and the debate teams from both sides are invited to collect evidence again and continue the debate later.

(2) Children discuss with each other and operate in groups. Build a biological chain based on the feeding relationship between animals and plants, and understand the close relationship between animals, plants and the environment.

Question: If a certain species disappears or becomes too numerous or too few in nature. what happens?

(Provide videos of individual species becoming overrun)

Summary: There are too many phenomena in nature of powerful species preying on weak species, such as leopards preying on antelopes. It is precisely because of the existence of these mutual predation phenomena that we have a very balanced ecosystem. otherwise. Too little of any species will affect the ecological environment.

4. It is advisable to determine the outcome of the court trial and guide children to look at problems with dialectical thinking.

Well, learn to avoid danger and protect yourself. Question: Should a leopard be convicted of killing an antelope?

Faced with such a powerful enemy as the leopard, how does the antelope do its best to protect itself?

Summary: Although it is a mess for a leopard to prey on an antelope, it is indeed a normal ecological phenomenon in nature, so the leopard cannot be found guilty. When encountering a powerful enemy like a leopard that we have no strength to contend with, the best way to protect ourselves is to hide far away, and to leave as quickly as possible when the leopard comes.

[Activity Extension]

Put in CDs about animals. Books and pictures are placed in the book area. Puzzle areas and other areas can stimulate children's interest in continuing to explore in depth. "Animal Court" Kindergarten Class Lesson Plan 2

Activity goals:

1. Briefly understand the food chain in nature. Understand the simple principles of ecological balance and know how to care for animals and plants.

2. Try to use appropriate language to argue, and initially learn to look at problems dialectically.

3. Guide children to observe the pictures carefully and stimulate their imagination.

4. Understand the content and enrich related vocabulary.

Highlights of the activity:

Allow children to perceive the phenomenon of animal food chains, understand the simple principles of ecological balance, and carry out environmental education.

Enable young children to understand the concept of the food chain and the interdependent relationship between animals and plants.

Activity preparation:

1. Environment creation: Mock court - president's seat, plaintiff's seat, defendant's seat with small hammer.

2. PPT related video materials.

3. Children’s experience preparation and understanding of relevant knowledge of court debate.

Activity process:

1. Conversation and discussion:

Teacher: Ask the children to observe what changes have occurred in the classroom, and where have they changed?

Teacher: Ask the children to think about where they have seen this scene? What is it used for? Do you know its name? Its name is court.

Teacher: Let’s have a court debate where the teacher will focus on explaining the role of the court? What is debate? The relationship between the judge, the plaintiff and the defendant

2. Storytelling and conducting Court debater: "Let's see who came to the court? Why did they come here?" Storyteller: Who came to the court? (Young: Little White Rabbit and Big Bad Wolf) What did they come for? Court? (Children: Because the big bad wolf wants to eat up the little white rabbit, and the little white rabbit wants to eat up all the grass) Teacher: Then the children say who did the right thing and who did the wrong thing? (Children freely express their own opinions) Teacher: Okay, let us debate this matter today, how about it?

Teacher: Then our children should be divided into two parties, one is the partner of the little white rabbit, One side is the partner of the big bad wolf. We sit on both sides. If you choose the little white rabbit, sit here and explain your opinions. On the contrary, if you choose the big bad wolf, sit over there and explain your own opinions. . Okay, now let the children choose. (Children are free to choose and sit down) Teacher: Let us debate two questions today. Through these two questions, we will know the answers!

Debate 1. Should the big bad wolf eat? Little White Rabbit? Both sides state their reasons and play the video "Rabbit Causes Disaster" (teachers complement each other's opinions in a timely manner to guide children to understand more comprehensively). Debate 2. Should the big bad wolf be sentenced? Children can freely explain.

3. The teacher explains the food chain division by showing animal pictures and related videos: Both sides have their own reasons, so how should the judgment be made? Ask the children to imagine: If the earth is full of one animal (lion) , tigers, snakes...), what will the world look like? (Children express freely, the teacher can ask several children to express their opinions) Teacher: Today the teacher brought some pictures, children, let’s see how they relate to each other relation.

Show the video to let children simply understand the food chain in nature: eagle→snake→frog→locust→grass master: Children, what do you know after watching this video? This relationship between them is biological The food chain in the world. What other food chains can you name?

Then do you think the big bad wolf should still be sentenced?

4. Food chain game: Children wear headgear, find their favorite "food" and hold hands with it, thus forming a food chain and consolidating the concept of children's food chain Cognition.

5. Judge: Through this debate, we know that rabbits and wolves are both links in the food chain and play an important role in balancing and protecting the environment. Which animal has too many or too many? Anything less will affect the earth's environment. The leaves and fruits grown by plants provide food for bugs. Birds eat bugs, so there are birds. With eagles and snakes, rats will not cause trouble. The relationship between them is "one thing lowers another thing".

Therefore, wolves are meat-eating animals. Most of the small animals they eat are old, weak, sick, and weak. If all the wolves are killed, the small animals that eat grass will There will be more and more, the plants will be eaten up, the environment will be destroyed, and humans will be in danger, so wolves cannot kill them all. It seems that no one can interfere with animals in nature, because in a food chain, as long as one link goes wrong, the food chain will be affected, and the creatures on the earth will face disasters. We cannot kill wolves just to protect rabbits. Kill them all, and the wolf can't eat all the rabbits. The trial ends here and the case ends. "Animal Court" Kindergarten Class Lesson Plan 3

● Activity Objectives

1. Preliminarily learn to look at problems dialectically.

2. Simply understand the knowledge of biological chains and perceive the close relationship between animals and the environment.

●Activity preparation

1. Environment creation: Mock court——The president’s seat is in the middle of the activity room, with the plaintiff’s seat and the defendant’s seat on both sides. The white rabbit and the gray rabbit Rabbit plush toys or headwear are placed in front of their respective seats.

2. Dress up in black cloth as a judge’s robe and have a small hammer.

3. A clip of the conversation between the Lion King and Simba on the grass at night in the cartoon "The Lion King".

4. Early childhood learning resources ③ pages 32~33.

● Activity Suggestions

1. Show the white rabbit and gray wolf stuffed animals and ask questions to lay the foundation for the next debate.

Suggested question: Which one do you like, the little white rabbit or the gray wolf, and why.

What would happen to our lives if there were too many little white rabbits?

What would happen to the forest if there were no wolves?

2. Young children read the Early Childhood Learning Resources ③ pages 32~33 and listen to the teacher telling stories.

3. Recruit young lawyers and invite children to conduct court arguments.

Role allocation: Children can choose whose lawyer they want to be, and after making the choice, sit next to the client (plaintiff or defendant). The teacher wore a black judge's robe and pretended to be the president of the Big Bear.

(1) Debate 1: Should the big bad wolf eat the little white rabbit? Both parties state their reasons.

After the first stage, children can freely adjust their seats and re-select the client to continue the debate.

(2) Debate 2: Should the Big Bad Wolf be found guilty?

4. Enjoy the clip of the conversation between the Lion King and Simba on the grass at night in the cartoon "The Lion King". Invite the children to discuss the meaning of this conversation.

Debate once again whether to convict the Big Bad Wolf.

4. After the judge pronounced the verdict, he knocked the hammer to signify the end. Conclusion: Rabbits and wolves are both a pair in the biological chain and play an important role in balancing and protecting the environment. Too much or too little of either animal will affect the earth's environment. So you can't kill all the wolves just to protect the rabbits, and the wolves can't eat all the rabbits. This is the end of the trial.

●Activity extension

Collect and watch books, pictures or videos about biological chains.

(Attachment: Story)

Animal Court

Jimmy the rabbit came to the court and sued the gray wolf Mike for eating many of his companions.

Jimmy cried and said: "Who did we offend whom? We live on grass all day long and never hurt others. They are all big bad wolves who bully people. They rely on their big size and fast running. We chase and bite them when they catch them. Now the rabbits are terrified all day long, for fear of being eaten accidentally.

President, you have to make the decision for us! "

President Big Bear was very angry, so he sent the gray wolf Mike to ask what happened. Unexpectedly, Mike looked aggrieved and said: "If we don't eat rabbits, the rabbits will eat up all the grasslands. , turning grassland into desert and affecting the earth's environment. What we do is purely to eliminate harm to the earth! Moreover, our living conditions are very difficult. Although there are no tigers or lions to eat us, we will starve to death and die of old age when there is no food. We will also die of illness when the plague occurs. Who will make the decision for us? ”

After hearing what they said, President Daxiong was at a loss as to how to judge this case fairly.