Zong Houqing, chairman of Wahaha, said that the wealth of the rich is social. What do you think of his statement?

In fact, the first time I saw him say this, I felt that I didn't quite understand that the wealth of the rich was social. Isn't the money my own? But on second thought, it really makes sense. Let's give a simple example. As ordinary people, the money we earn from work is to meet our daily needs, such as the expenses of food, clothing, housing and transportation. All our money is spent on this, but these rich people are not like this.

Let's start with why they have money. Most of the rich people here are famous entrepreneurs. They run their companies and enterprises well and make high profits, so they have become rich themselves. Why is their wealth social? That's because when they run their companies better and better, they will also create more jobs, so they are equivalent to providing employment opportunities for more people and helping the society to reduce part of the burden.

Secondly, these well-run enterprises and companies must cooperate if they want to get further development. No matter who you cooperate with, it will also promote the development of the other party, so the other party will also give more people the opportunity to work. In addition, the company will also support some small and medium-sized enterprises, and even do some charitable activities for sustainable development. In this case, the wealth of the rich truly belongs to society.

We often say that the rich will be richer because when a person's life goal is no longer to satisfy his own food, clothing, housing and transportation, he will have greater pursuit and realize his self-worth at the same time. In this case, the value brought by a person is indeed very beneficial to society. Take our disaster in Henan as an example. Don't many enterprises donate money and materials? When I saw this, I suddenly thought that it might be taken from the people and used by the people.