How to quickly improve your comprehensive arts scores?

The liberal arts comprehensive requires us to integrate various specific subjects, but its most fundamental foothold is still in the three subjects of history, politics and geography. If you fail to grasp these three courses well, it will be difficult to achieve good results in the liberal arts comprehensive. As the saying goes, "It is difficult for a clever woman to make a meal without rice." In the same way, without the knowledge points of these three courses as a basis, how can we use the "comprehensive" liberal arts comprehensive? Therefore, to learn liberal arts comprehensive well, the first thing is to learn history, politics and geography well. Only by laying this solid foundation can further integration be achieved.

1. Regarding history

(1) Read the textbooks thoroughly

History is a relatively "dead" subject. History attaches great importance to the examination of the grasp of existing knowledge in textbooks. Therefore, to deal with tit-for-tat, textbooks are a magic weapon. My approach is to watch it over and over again. Regarding reading, I have a few suggestions:

1. Grasp the framework of the book and memorize the table of contents and subtitles. Because every history book is organized according to a certain order and rules. What we accept is not scattered knowledge points but the whole knowledge. Only by memorizing the catalog can we accurately grasp the clues of historical development, establish in-depth connections between knowledge points, and lay the foundation for the transfer and application of knowledge. When answering questions in the examination room, you can make broad-span and macro-level summaries, and try to avoid losing points due to omission of ideas.

2. Don’t miss any corner. Read the large and small characters together, as well as annotations, illustrations and explanations, etc. Contents not included in the outline should also be covered appropriately. Because the phenomenon of "exceeding the syllabus" of test questions often occurs, for example, this year's Guangxi history multiple-choice question caught most candidates at a loss.

3. Pay attention to organizing notes and copying them into books. I don’t have a separate history notebook because I think it’s best to put notes in a book so that they can be closely connected with textbook knowledge. I copied the extended knowledge or insightful insights from several reference materials into the book, and reviewed them together when flipping through the textbook. In this way, your historical language expression will be more complete and professional in the exam, covering a wider range of topics and spans, and you will score higher.

4. Summary of topics. The teacher will also summarize this in the second round of review, but it will be best if you can summarize it yourself. For example, the world's best, China *** conference and so on. This will not only make reading more interesting, but also improve your ability to summarize.

(2) Historical question answering skills

1. Put historical events, characters, and concepts under specific historical conditions and analyze them against the general background of the time. They cannot be subjective. For example, when asked about the difference between Chinese reform thought and French Enlightenment thought in promoting social change, most people can answer the question of constitutional monarchy, developing capitalism and learning from Western science and culture, but many miss the content of saving the nation. The reason is that most of them fail to analyze the problem from the background of China's national crisis.

2. Be good at using materials. This year's Guangxi Middle School history material question actually only needs to summarize the points of the very long material to get full marks. In previous years, there were quite a few answers that were extracted directly from the materials given in the questions.

3. Use terminology accurately and not wordy. When I was in my third year of high school, I was prone to being wordy when answering history questions. Later, the teacher told me that few of the standard answers in history are narrative, and they are all definitional. I found the same thing after referring to many real questions. Answering questions concisely and to the point can save time and make the examiner more "engaged", thus improving your score.

2. For geography:

(1) Memorize the map

The key to geography is the map. Only when you know the map correctly can you expand more broadly from what the map gives.

1. World geography. I read through the two world geography textbooks many times and cut out every region and possible map in them. Then I can browse it anytime and anywhere. For example, I memorized the crop distribution map of the United States for about a week. After you are familiar with the map, you can then extend based on the map. For example, in the United States, after you are familiar with the distribution map of crops, you can extend to why they are distributed in this way, what the climate is like, how the transportation is, etc. The global climate, ocean currents, etc. are also key objects to strengthen. I use filling methods for this. That is, I would draw the specific climate, ocean currents, vegetation zones, etc. on the blank map, so that no matter what picture comes out during the exam, I can clearly reflect it in my mind.

2. Geography of China.

This is very specific geography and requires us to concentrate on memorizing textual materials in the textbook. I also use filling methods on maps, such as rainfall, mountains, rivers, etc., and trace them one by one myself. In terms of written narrative, I mostly use books, because the expressions in books are the most professional. When answering the questions, answer them completely from the perspective of the textbook, and practice continuously in daily exams to make the expressions as close as possible to the expressions in the textbook.

(2) Science in liberal arts

Geography is more troublesome for liberal arts candidates in aspects such as astronomical calculations. My method is to grasp the rules and then do a lot of questions. For example, the "high high low low" principle of contour lines, as well as the morning and evening lines and late intersection points are located at 6 o'clock or 18 o'clock on the longitude, etc. These rules are very helpful in solving some difficult geography problems. And my attitude towards geography questions is the same as mathematics, and I treat them all as math problems. I bought two such books specifically to practice, and until the end I would never make any more mistakes in these calculations.

3. Regarding politics

(1) Organizing knowledge points

I have read less political textbooks than history. Because I think politics is not like history, which requires memorizing historical facts. Instead, it requires sorting out clues to a certain knowledge point according to the theme, and sorting it out in correspondence with commonly used examination materials and question types to form a knowledge framework. For example, regarding price issues, we can consider value determination, the impact of supply and demand, market formation, and macro-control, and each aspect can derive a lot of content. From the perspective of political science, the economic functions of the government can be derived. 1. When reading, you need to organize it and read it carefully. For example, one year I took a test on a specific explanation of a certain feature of the market economy. It was explained in detail in the textbook, but because it was not in boldface, most students could not recite the answer in full. 2. For objective questions, my opinion is to do more and get more points. Because objective questions account for a large amount of points, you must be very cautious. And this must be achieved through a solid foundation and skillful application. In order to improve my score on political objective questions in my senior year of high school, I took thousands of multiple-choice questions. 3. For subjective questions, I think it is enough to sort out the knowledge points from the textbook, then add the question materials and hot spots. 4. The concepts must be clearly distinguished. For example, dialectical materialism and materialist dialectics, the difference between dialectical materialism, etc. This year Guangxi has stumped many candidates based on this, and I was not spared. Therefore, I hope that fellow students can distinguish between various similar words and understand the concepts. [page]

(2) Pay attention to hot spots

Since politics uses hot spots as proposition carriers, there cannot be a disconnect between knowledge and hot spots. Especially in the first two months, we should start to use hot spots as units and from the perspective of propositions, analyze and summarize relevant knowledge points to form a more targeted knowledge system. My steps are: first find out what major hot spots are within the current affairs scope of the exam; then figure out the angle of the proposition; then use the angle as a clue to organize relevant knowledge and form a targeted new system; then use relevant knowledge to analyze the hot spots; finally It is to use some "key guesses" to practice your test-taking ability and test whether you have really grasped it. For example, for a harmonious society, I will analyze it from the why and how, and analyze it in terms of economics, politics, and philosophy.

When answering questions, you must always think about hot topics. For example, when I answer political questions, I never forget to answer "conducive to building a socialist harmonious society", etc. This is suitable for any use. , and it may even make the marking teacher’s eyes light up.