According to the article, if there is Bole in the world, there will be a swift horse. Which do you think is more important? Tell your reasons in combination with reality.

Practically speaking, a swift horse is more important. For example, if you have talent, others may not use it, but if you have no talent, others will certainly not use it. Generally speaking, the analysis of problems is mainly based on subjective conditions and less on objective excuses. This is the idea that a rational person should have. In the final analysis, we can only change the subjective conditions, that is, ourselves. What's more, improving yourself is a lifelong task. Don't you get ahead if others don't look for you? People live for themselves, and if they care too much about the outside world, they will lose their way. Of course, this is a subjective view of people, and I personally think it is beneficial to people. If we want to analyze it scientifically, the answer is not necessarily. This is a subjective and objective problem, but also a big philosophical problem. After years of disagreement among different factions, I won't join in the fun.